Moderator: Cartographers
Balsiefen wrote:Europe-7 pages
USApoccolipse-9 pages
canada-3
It seems to be all the old maps and most of them are ones i quite like.
Anyway, one that i do see uyour point on is brittish isles but generally i think its random how good a map is compared to how many pages there are
But they are still good maps. I would say that most of the reason maps take longer is graphics. If a cartographer quickly updates, maps go quicker.DiM wrote:Balsiefen wrote:Europe-7 pages
USApoccolipse-9 pages
canada-3
It seems to be all the old maps and most of them are ones i quite like.
Anyway, one that i do see uyour point on is brittish isles but generally i think its random how good a map is compared to how many pages there are
none of those maps was made in the current foundry process
Well that would be me DiM. I have only a certain amount of time. And if anyone is keeping track, I have not been on CC very much lately. I have other things to do outside. And when I am on I need to get my maps worked on.DiM wrote:i dream of a foundry where each map maker posts in other map threads, where each visitor knows how to post and where to post and gives good feedback, where any new idea is greeted with an open mind no matter how absurd it may seem, where map makers aren't afraid to share tutorials and brushes and give tips to less talented people., a place where high quality maps are produced and where everybody can come and visit and contribute to this great site.
WOW. I did not even notice the small print. I agree with rebelman here. Maybe instead of completely giving up, just scale back a little.rebelman wrote:DiM I will comment on your other points later, but please, please, please, please, please, please, please reconsider what you have written in smalll print. Although we don't always see eye to eye - you are one of the best critics on this site (not just in the foundry) and your words are often both thought and action provoking. Just because people disagree with you or your ideas are not always implemented, you should not abandon ship. I for one will always read your posts - agree when they make sense and disagree when they don't or when I have a contrasting opinion to yours.
I think i can guess what caused you to post this (as the codes in your main post were fairly easy to follow), but i am strongly urging you to reconsider your decision.
rebelman wrote:DiM I will comment on your other points later, but please, please, please, please, please, please, please reconsider what you have written in smalll print. Although we don't always see eye to eye - you are one of the best critics on this site (not just in the foundry) and your words are often both thought and action provoking. Just because people disagree with you or your ideas are not always implemented, you should not abandon ship. I for one will always read your posts - agree when they make sense and disagree when they don't or when I have a contrasting opinion to yours.
I think i can guess what caused you to post this (as the codes in your main post were fairly easy to follow), but i am strongly urging you to reconsider your decision.
yeti_c wrote:I like the title - it sums up what DiM's post says in 2 words...
C.
rebelman wrote:yeti_c wrote:I like the title - it sums up what DiM's post says in 2 words...
C.
I agree
Although many here would understand it better if it was written in English - although anyone with experience with horses will be familiar with the version used by DiM.
"Hasten Slowly"
AndyDufresne wrote:These discussion posts are always an interesting (and lengthy) read. Coleman and I are doing our best in the Foundry. The worst part of the Foundry is that it's a group process. The best part of the Foundry is that it's a group process.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users