Conquer Club

I think all the xml bonuses and various devices should be in here. so we know what we have to work with.

mibi wrote:I think all the xml bonuses and various devices should be in here. so we know what we have to work with.

I'm pretty sure that all the available XML tags are shown in this topic.

C.

Question: are we allowed to do negative bonuses?

bryguy wrote:Question: are we allowed to do negative bonuses?

shouldnt this be in the questions thread

and yeh you are, i think.
you get negative bonuses on a few maps

t-o-m wrote:

bryguy wrote:Question: are we allowed to do negative bonuses?

shouldnt this be in the questions thread

and yeh you are, i think.
you get negative bonuses on a few maps

oh, didnt know there was a xml questions thread. And which maps? and im not talking about decay, im talking about something like this:

Code: Select all

<continent>
   <name>NAME HERE</name>
   <bonus>-1 (negative 1, this in () not included in the code)</bonus>
   <components>
      <territory>NAME</territory>
   </components>
</continent>

wouldnt that give you next to nothing deploy rate?

bryguy wrote:

t-o-m wrote:

bryguy wrote:Question: are we allowed to do negative bonuses?

shouldnt this be in the questions thread

and yeh you are, i think.
you get negative bonuses on a few maps

oh, didnt know there was a xml questions thread. And which maps? and im not talking about decay, im talking about something like this:

Code: Select all

<continent>
   <name>NAME HERE</name>
   <bonus>-1 (negative 1, this in () not included in the code)</bonus>
   <components>
      <territory>NAME</territory>
   </components>
</continent>

yes this is possible.

t-o-m wrote:wouldnt that give you next to nothing deploy rate?

no, cause with the min reinforcements tag you can set it so that people can have a minnimum of 1 army to deploy.

No no no.

Continental bonuses - and Terriorial bonuses are not reflected in the reinforcements bonus.

C.

bryguy wrote:

t-o-m wrote:wouldnt that give you next to nothing deploy rate?

no, cause with the min reinforcements tag you can set it so that people can have a minnimum of 1 army to deploy.

yes thats what i said.

it would be absolutely shit gameplay as you wouldnt be able to do anything.
stalemate.
whoever is lucky wins.

gameplay on that map - crap.

t-o-m wrote:

bryguy wrote:

t-o-m wrote:wouldnt that give you next to nothing deploy rate?

no, cause with the min reinforcements tag you can set it so that people can have a minnimum of 1 army to deploy.

yes thats what i said.

it would be absolutely shit gameplay as you wouldnt be able to do anything.
stalemate.
whoever is lucky wins.

gameplay on that map - crap.

Not true at all - many maps have negative continents (and even negative terriotorial bonuses)

C.

yeti_c wrote:
Not true at all - many maps have negative continents (and even negative terriotorial bonuses)

C.

deploying 1 army per turn, to get to terits?
that would be bad and boring.

t-o-m wrote:

yeti_c wrote:
Not true at all - many maps have negative continents (and even negative terriotorial bonuses)

C.

deploying 1 army per turn, to get to terits?
that would be bad and boring.

yes but thats only if your dum (yes i meant to spell it like that) and (for famine) dont get the thing to stop it in that area.