Page 1 of 1

Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:13 am
by Qwert
I realy need some objective explanation for these examle.
WWI Ottoman Empire by Cairnswk start 15 avgust
Europe 1914 by Qwert. start 13 avgust

From mine point of view i belive that bouth map is very good graphicaly and that have same requested things,but Cairnswk map leads and move very fast and now is in Main map Foundry and all ready get stamp,and mine still standing in starting position,and not moving any where.Even numbers of stamp lickers and Mod feedback is almost same(Ottoman 8 feedback-Europe 1914 7 feedback).
I realy need some neutral opinion abouth these.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:26 am
by mibi
It's only been two weeks. Slow them horses kiddo, this is the foundry.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:30 am
by Qwert
by mibi on Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:26 pm

It's only been two weeks. Slow them horses kiddo, this is the foundry.

Mine horse still not moving ;)

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:58 am
by Night Strike
Since when does a start date automatically mean you get advanced in a set amount of time??

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:14 am
by t-o-m
Night Strike wrote:Since when does a start date automatically mean you get advanced in a set amount of time??

It doesnt but if you pay a visit to the foundry once a month you're bound to see some of qwert's complaining.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:25 am
by Qwert
by t-o-m on Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:14 pm

Night Strike wrote:
Since when does a start date automatically mean you get advanced in a set amount of time??
It doesnt but if you pay a visit to the foundry once a month you're bound to see some of qwert's complaining.

Aim not complaining,i just want explanation,and i know that for you every thing is perfect here in Map foundry,for me its not perfect,but these is mine opinion.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:15 pm
by edbeard
I saw this coming when both maps started.

cairnswk's has had more updates and more interest.


your map has had 4 real versions (all prior ones weren't playable and people really couldn't give feedback on them). his map has had 9 versions all of which were playable.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:19 pm
by oaktown
qwert wrote:Cairnswk map leads and move very fast and now is in Main map Foundry and all ready get stamp,and mine still standing in starting position,and not moving any where.Even numbers of stamp lickers and Mod feedback is almost same(Ottoman 8 feedback-Europe 1914 7 feedback).

So, you're saying that you are both being treated equally, yet his map has progressed faster than yours. Two possibilities:
1) His map is better than yours.
2) Cairnswk is more open to constructive criticism than you are, and he is more willing to make suggested changes.

I haven't even looked at either map, so I don't know if either of these two things are true. I'm just throwing it out there, since you asked.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:22 pm
by t-o-m
qwert wrote:
by t-o-m on Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:14 pm

Night Strike wrote:
Since when does a start date automatically mean you get advanced in a set amount of time??
It doesnt but if you pay a visit to the foundry once a month you're bound to see some of qwert's complaining.

Aim not complaining,i just want explanation,and i know that for you every thing is perfect here in Map foundry,for me its not perfect,but these is mine opinion.

qwert, with all fairness you started making threads and complaining that your roman map wasn't in FF, even though it went on the sticky after my map, and got into FF sooner.
I had been waiting on that sticky for 2 months, and only now did i begin to wonder what was going on.

oaktown wrote:So, you're saying that you are both being treated equally, yet his map has progressed faster than yours. Two possibilities:
1) His map is better than yours.
2) Cairnswk is more open to constructive criticism than you are, and he is more willing to make suggested changes.

I believe 2) is the best, most suitable option.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:29 pm
by oaktown
OK, looked at your map qwert - it's quite nice. But it's only been two weeks... what's your hurry? Some of us have had maps in there longer than that, and we're content to see the process through.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:38 pm
by Qwert
by oaktown on Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:29 pm

OK, looked at your map qwert - it's quite nice. But it's only been two weeks... what's your hurry? Some of us have had maps in there longer than that, and we're content to see the process through.

Yes these is i can ask mod,what is hurry to move Cairnswk map forward,and its only been les then two weeks.
And you posted in Cairnswk topic before once to say that lickers is not coordinated because give two idea stamp.

So, you're saying that you are both being treated equally, yet his map has progressed faster than yours. Two possibilities:
1) His map is better than yours.
2) Cairnswk is more open to constructive criticism than you are, and he is more willing to make suggested changes.

I haven't even looked at either map, so I don't know if either of these two things are true. I'm just throwing it out there, since you asked.

How can you say these before you enter Europe 1914 topic,you can ask people in treath what they think about mine work in Europe 1914 topic. I whas very cooperative and listen people what sugested.

Re: Explanation

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:04 pm
by oaktown
Topic locked. Let's talk about your map in the map development thread, not in Foundry Discussion.