Conquer Club

Cena....you really don't want to start trolling...

And lack can VETO a map at any stage he feels necessary. Would you have rather he wait until it was in FF and lack tells him that he refuses to put it on his site?

Lack has final say over anything and doesn't really need a rule set for a decision that he makes

well why was he allowed to spend OVER A MONTH (and FP you are in TUC, so you know) working on the old map when he was banned. It makes no sense. Now I wont flame as long as I get a decent explanation thats not cause lack said so, cause then the shit will hit the fan

Kick Twill in the balls and someone whack lack for not doing nothing.

I made a bug post agies ago and it wasn't ever answered yet the bug still persists. Why so poor? i did not pay for poor service, and i like T-O-M!!!!

cena-rules wrote:Now I wont flame as long as I get a decent explanation thats not cause lack said so, cause then the shit will hit the fan

"Cause lack said so" Is a perfectly viable answer when it comes to his property. He created, and owns this site, and if you don't like it, you're going to have to learn to deal with the ban you seem to be so intent on getting.

cena-rules wrote:t-o-m has made a perfectly good contribution and cause he was banned, for no fucking reason by a guy with his head so far up his own arse that he can eat his spleen, he is not allowed to continue it.

Well I tell ya what f*ck you

f*ck you and all this bollocks. Move this to FW and ban me I dont give 2 shits, the forum is a joke

he was allowed to continue his madagascar map, maybe you should pull that lack, it was made by a banned member

Not only is your blaming of twill wrong, its a little arrogant. The only person that has said anything about t-o-m not being allowed to continue his map is me.

Not letting his continue is part of the NEW forum guidelines, which states:

If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.

Letting him finish his first map is a sign of good will so that his good work that he did before being banned doesn't go to waste. However being that he is now forum banned, letting him work within the forum via a third party is wrong in many opinions. (Both within abd outwith teamCC)/ If you get yourself banned you should lose all forum priviages, weather or not those contribute to the site or not.

Sorry that this is what it came to, but t-o-m had more than enought chances to redeem his behaviour.

Mods while your listening why was diddle banned? Someone said the n-word to get your attention over there and you didnt even reply heres a link;

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=72537&start=45

Timminz wrote:

cena-rules wrote:Now I wont flame as long as I get a decent explanation thats not cause lack said so, cause then the shit will hit the fan

"Cause lack said so" Is a perfectly viable answer when it comes to his property. He created, and owns this site, and if you don't like it, you're going to have to learn to deal with the ban you seem to be so intent on getting.

Im sorry for being human and questioning something

so if you came to my house and I told you to jump off the roof youd do it?

its my property, so I have a decent explanation apparently

@gimil, so now I see inconsistencies with you and lack both claiming it was you

cena-rules wrote:

Timminz wrote:

cena-rules wrote:Now I wont flame as long as I get a decent explanation thats not cause lack said so, cause then the shit will hit the fan

"Cause lack said so" Is a perfectly viable answer when it comes to his property. He created, and owns this site, and if you don't like it, you're going to have to learn to deal with the ban you seem to be so intent on getting.

Im sorry for being human and questioning something

so if you came to my house and I told you to jump off the roof youd do it?

its my property, so I have a decent explanation apparently

@gimil, so now I see inconsistencies with you and lack both claiming it was you

I didn't claim it was me, I mearly said it was me that told you what was happening. Meaning you blaming twill was a stab in the dark.

Im blaming Twill for the perm-ban that was unwarrented

the map, well f*ck the map. Also people post for banned users all the time. In fact and advance draft is also by t-o-m. He just hasnt claimed it. Have fun figuring out which one

Against my better judgment since you chose to start two new threads after a lock, I'm moving this one over to Foundry Discussion where it actually belongs.

I think gimil's explanation was totally informative

The final word is, banned members are that, banned. That means that even if he wants to continue to contribute to the site, he can't since his ban means he is banished from the forum. Long story short, t-o-m can't continue his map, sorry.

the mods/lack/"powers that be" figured out that a previous policy (allowing people to post on behalf of banned people) was a poor one. It allows a person who is banned to circumvent that banning. tom should feel lucky he was allowed to finish his old map.

Night Strike wrote:Against my better judgment since you chose to start two new threads after a lock, I'm moving this one over to Foundry Discussion where it actually belongs.

this one is about the rights of forum-banned members


*goes and shoots some ducks*

cena-rules wrote:Im blaming Twill for the perm-ban that was unwarrented

the map, well f*ck the map. Also people post for banned users all the time. In fact and advance draft is also by t-o-m. He just hasnt claimed it. Have fun figuring out which one

Well the initial discussion was about t-o-m not being aloud to continue his map, so what is it going to be? Map discussion or t-o-m's ban? If you don't agree (still) with the ban PM an admin. Its them you want to discuss it with. Although I don't see any change to that situation. If you want to disucss t-o-m making maps while banned then we can have it out here.

Warning thou, if your just going to bitch and moan, rather than discuss then this conversation will be over quicker than you think.

Post at your own disgression

gimil wrote:

cena-rules wrote:Im blaming Twill for the perm-ban that was unwarrented

the map, well f*ck the map. Also people post for banned users all the time. In fact and advance draft is also by t-o-m. He just hasnt claimed it. Have fun figuring out which one

Well the initial discussion was about t-o-m not being aloud to continue his map, so what is it going to be? Map discussion or t-o-m's ban? If you don't agree (still) with the ban PM an admin. Its them you want to discuss it with. Although I don't see any change to that situation. If you want to disucss t-o-m making maps while banned then we can have it out here.

Warning thou, if your just going to bitch and moan, rather than discuss then this conversation will be over quicker than you think.

meh, the fact an e-ticket was submitted and never answered shows the lack of care by admin. f*ck the map its CC's loss.

I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

cena-rules wrote:I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

But, if you stop arguing, this won't go where I thought I "knew" it was going.

cena-rules wrote:meh, the fact an e-ticket was submitted and never answered shows the lack of care by admin. f*ck the map its CC's loss.

I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

We have no problem if you want to 'discuss' the issue. Doubt the discussion will change the verdict but like I said, I don't have a problem with discussion, as long as trolling, flaming or anything else negative isn't brought to the foundry I am not bothered.

Cam someone fill in for me why t-o-m was banned. I've been wondering that for quite some time.

gimil wrote:

cena-rules wrote:meh, the fact an e-ticket was submitted and never answered shows the lack of care by admin. f*ck the map its CC's loss.

I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

We have no problem if you want to 'discuss' the issue. Doubt the discussion will change the verdict but like I said, I don't have a problem with discussion, as long as trolling, flaming or anything else negative isn't brought to the foundry I am not bothered.

The point of discussion is change. No discussion will change anything. Like I said its CC's loss

cena-rules wrote:

gimil wrote:

cena-rules wrote:meh, the fact an e-ticket was submitted and never answered shows the lack of care by admin. f*ck the map its CC's loss.

I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

We have no problem if you want to 'discuss' the issue. Doubt the discussion will change the verdict but like I said, I don't have a problem with discussion, as long as trolling, flaming or anything else negative isn't brought to the foundry I am not bothered.

The point of discussion is change. No discussion will change anything. Like I said its CC's loss

i would argue that it is a absorbable lose. We have loads of new ace maps coming through the foundry. Although it is a shame that t-o-m got banned (from a foundry perspective) he did have talent.

gimil wrote:

cena-rules wrote:

gimil wrote:

cena-rules wrote:meh, the fact an e-ticket was submitted and never answered shows the lack of care by admin. f*ck the map its CC's loss.

I think we all know where this is going so there is no point in me arguing

We have no problem if you want to 'discuss' the issue. Doubt the discussion will change the verdict but like I said, I don't have a problem with discussion, as long as trolling, flaming or anything else negative isn't brought to the foundry I am not bothered.

The point of discussion is change. No discussion will change anything. Like I said its CC's loss

i would argue that it is a absorbable lose. We have loads of new ace maps coming through the foundry. Although it is a shame that t-o-m got banned (from a foundry perspective) he did have talent.

he still does have a map on the way through the foundry, Ill let you know when it hits FF

If you plan on playing the system, whatever stage t-o-m#s map hits, as soon as I find out I will stop it

gimil wrote:If you plan on playing the system, whatever stage t-o-m#s map hits, as soon as I find out I will stop it

then let the games begin

cena-rules wrote:

gimil wrote:If you plan on playing the system, whatever stage t-o-m#s map hits, as soon as I find out I will stop it

then let the games begin

I'm noy playing games, and since this isn't a discussion that was ment, consider this locked.


[locked]