Conquer Club

Cleared Coach Woodcock[SN]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Coach Woodcock[SN]

Postby Gwaahjo on Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:09 pm

Accused:

Coach Woodcock

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 14872204

Comments: Clearly a 2nd/Fake account of someone I have blocked.
User avatar
Major Gwaahjo
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby Edric Wolfswift on Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:08 pm

This person may indeed be a multi, but what makes you say "Clearly a 2nd/Fake account"? In the past couple of weeks I have had a plethora of NRs deadbeat, and this just seems to be the same thing.
User avatar
Private Edric Wolfswift
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 9:27 am
Location: Anywhere but here...Fuck Conquer Club

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby Gwaahjo on Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:43 pm

He's not deadbeating. He tactically missed a turn to drop armies the next turn. He takes his actual turns extremely fast for a "newbie" as well (as in, less than a minute when he begins to end).

You know when someone is an actual new player, and you know when they aren't. To me, it's very clear. Let them run IPs and see what they find.
User avatar
Major Gwaahjo
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby clangfield on Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:50 am

Gwaahjo wrote:He's not deadbeating. He tactically missed a turn to drop armies the next turn. He takes his actual turns extremely fast for a "newbie" as well (as in, less than a minute when he begins to end).

You know when someone is an actual new player, and you know when they aren't. To me, it's very clear. Let them run IPs and see what they find.


And you 'deliberately' failed to finish a turn - presumably because you wanted to delay him and make him miss another turn? Or perhaps it's wrong to ascribe a motive without the slightest scrap of evidence... :roll:
We'll see, but one miss in 7 rounds doesn't constitute evidence in my view.
Lieutenant clangfield
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Kent, UK

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby macbone on Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:39 am

It looks like he used that missed turn to his advantage, blockading his bonus. Shrewd move.
User avatar
Colonel macbone
 
Posts: 6217
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: Running from a cliff racer

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby Gabriel13 on Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:39 am

Doesn't look like an experienced player to me. Taking a turn in under a minute is very simple for anybody in my opinion, especially when you're only taking one territory in that turn. I usually go for under 5 seconds if I'm attacking one territory.
User avatar
Cook Gabriel13
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:12 pm
2

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby iAmCaffeine on Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:49 am

Gabriel13 wrote:Doesn't look like an experienced player to me. Taking a turn in under a minute is very simple for anybody in my opinion, especially when you're only taking one territory in that turn. I usually go for under 5 seconds if I'm attacking one territory.


Brand new players generally take several minutes to complete a turn.
User avatar
Sergeant iAmCaffeine
 
Posts: 11109
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock[SN]

Postby sniffie on Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:40 am

nothing to see
Sergeant 1st Class sniffie
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock[SN]

Postby sniffie on Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:40 am

Cleared
Sergeant 1st Class sniffie
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby Gwaahjo on Wed Sep 24, 2014 12:37 pm

clangfield wrote:
Gwaahjo wrote:He's not deadbeating. He tactically missed a turn to drop armies the next turn. He takes his actual turns extremely fast for a "newbie" as well (as in, less than a minute when he begins to end).

You know when someone is an actual new player, and you know when they aren't. To me, it's very clear. Let them run IPs and see what they find.


And you 'deliberately' failed to finish a turn - presumably because you wanted to delay him and make him miss another turn? Or perhaps it's wrong to ascribe a motive without the slightest scrap of evidence... :roll:
We'll see, but one miss in 7 rounds doesn't constitute evidence in my view.


It wasn't a speed game, so how would me forgetting to finish my turn (while looking into how to report him) after an hour delay him? This is the most illogical argument I've ever heard.
User avatar
Major Gwaahjo
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Coach Woodcock

Postby clangfield on Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:56 pm

Gwaahjo wrote:
clangfield wrote:
Gwaahjo wrote:He's not deadbeating. He tactically missed a turn to drop armies the next turn. He takes his actual turns extremely fast for a "newbie" as well (as in, less than a minute when he begins to end).

You know when someone is an actual new player, and you know when they aren't. To me, it's very clear. Let them run IPs and see what they find.


And you 'deliberately' failed to finish a turn - presumably because you wanted to delay him and make him miss another turn? Or perhaps it's wrong to ascribe a motive without the slightest scrap of evidence... :roll:
We'll see, but one miss in 7 rounds doesn't constitute evidence in my view.


It wasn't a speed game, so how would me forgetting to finish my turn (while looking into how to report him) after an hour delay him? This is the most illogical argument I've ever heard.


I was being ironic. I was trying to suggest that accusing you of deliberately failing to end a turn was just as justified (or if you prefer directness, paranoid) of you accusing him of deliberately missing a turn.
My point was that you had no justification whatever for making the deduction that you made. I was ridiculing your position by making an equally "illogical" deduction.
I'm obviously going to have to be more blunt in future.
Lieutenant clangfield
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:57 am
Location: Kent, UK


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron