Conquer Club

Are the starting points already in the legend? Because that would need to be added too... I really love this idea qwert. I also like how there are a lot of territories and open gameplay. I want this to work out, but you might have to find a way to get a bigger legend in somewhere.

No they dont have legend,but now when i look on map,its impossible to create these inset
I must write in these inset all starting territory,because after 5-6 turns,people can forget what is starting territories, and i realy dont have space to write these bonus explanation, so these mean that +2 will be out.

I think that no need any legend who will say what is starting territory,when you start game you will know what territory is starting. I have many examples,where map dont have such explanation like-teritory "these and these is starting all others is neutral"
Everything what create squeze situation on map will be remove.
If you say +2 need to be on legend,then people will start with normal 3(on begining) and get +3 for every turn like is in normal gameplay. I hope that i dont need to write these in some bonus explanation.

well these can be most simple bonus explanation for +2 autodeploy for every starting position,because i dont have space for longest explanations,i think that people will understand from first games ,that every territory who have +2 give +2 autodeploy.

Onwards and upwards!

Thanks,now i only need two more stapm for FF.

MrBenn wrote:
Onwards and upwards!

Draft already? Wow!

I think you could use a symbol for autodeploy rather than just "+2" We already have the ships, so you just need to add one for land.

Draft already? Wow!

I think you could use a symbol for autodeploy rather than just "+2" We already have the ships, so you just need to add one for land.

What
Ships not present +2 autodeploy,ships present territories. How will you present Romans,Persians and Pontus? I can not put Circle in sea and say "these Circle Present Romans". Fleet is symbols for these territories,like in Imperium Romanum,every ship is territory. I dont know how you conclude that ships present +2 autodeploy?
Its very simple but efective solution for +2 autodeploy explanation.

holy crap this looks amazing. graphics wise, the only thing i can say is that the title font and graphic doesn't do the map justice.

by d.gishman on Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:11 am

holy crap this looks amazing. graphics wise, the only thing i can say is that the title font and graphic doesn't do the map justice.

Meaning of these words means good or bad?

Qwert, I think he means that the map looks really good, but he does not like the title.

by The Neon Peon on Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:00 pm

Qwert, I think he means that the map looks really good, but he does not like the title.

Well i can not help with that
I dont know what is problem,names or style of font?

style+font.

by d.gishman on Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:54 pm

style+font.

well its not mine fault,because ancient greeks not write in english letters.
These is Greek letters,and its very diferent from latin letters.

new update-diferent design of water,more lighter

Latest image didn't work, qwert.

now its work

The shields need something to make them a bit more noticable on the map, (as theyre mostly brown), maybe a glow around them?

by Balsiefen on Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:34 am

The shields need something to make them a bit more noticable on the map, (as theyre mostly brown), maybe a glow around them?

Well i want to be all without glow(shields,helmets,ships),but if you think that these is necessary,then i will try to add little glow.

qwert wrote:

by Balsiefen on Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:34 am

The shields need something to make them a bit more noticable on the map, (as theyre mostly brown), maybe a glow around them?

Well i want to be all without glow(shields,helmets,ships),but if you think that these is necessary,then i will try to add little glow.

I would say not glow, but a low drop shadow (if you're using Photoshop).

I would say not glow, but a low drop shadow (if you're using Photoshop).

hmm,i will try bouth and will add what is best,but probably shadow can be better then glow.

fresh new update-new features-extra bonuses-hold 4 crossed swords-+5

Your graphical skills always amaze me qwert, another stunning update=)

Cant see anything wrong with it, but could you give us a test with army numbers?

by Androidz » Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:54 pm

Your graphical skills always amaze me qwert, another stunning update=)

well,more or less,its kind a FF stage update,everything is same,just change a little things,like instead +2 i put new helmets to present these bonuses,and also add swords.

qwert wrote:

by Androidz » Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:54 pm

Your graphical skills always amaze me qwert, another stunning update=)

well,more or less,its kind a FF stage update,everything is same,just change a little things,like instead +2 i put new helmets to present these bonuses,and also add swords.

Well i was talking about the map in general. =) Anyway i edit the post above before you posted.

i really like the update. the new helmets for autodeploy solved your problem with space in the legend, the helmets for +1 also helped with space.

i don't know if i like the +5 for swords bonus though. i don't know why, but i just don't like it yet...

by whitestazn88 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:02 pm

i really like the update. the new helmets for autodeploy solved your problem with space in the legend, the helmets for +1 also helped with space.

i don't know if i like the +5 for swords bonus though. i don't know why, but i just don't like it yet...

Why? Its extra bonuse-if you hold all 4 get +5, its not easy to get these bonuses,because like you know all territories(except starting)start neutral.
i must say that i see some maps who give much then here(i start first game in Arms race and whas when i see +50 bonus for holding 10 territory)