Conquer Club

stahrgazer wrote:I think it would be a nice toggle rather than hard code no-option.

I think it is harder to do that then making it a non toggle

but yea it would be nice cuz sometimes i go to join a game and use it for going to peoples proffile

My point is that isn't what the page is for. We have a scoreboard and a members list if you'd like to go to profiles. And all of the games would still be shown in the game finder.

blakebowling wrote:My point is that isn't what the page is for. We have a scoreboard and a members list if you'd like to go to profiles. And all of the games would still be shown in the game finder.

You guys messed up the scoreboard servers. I have to get the exact username I can't get the username close to it.

I like this idea.

blakebowling wrote:My point is that isn't what the page is for. We have a scoreboard and a members list if you'd like to go to profiles. And all of the games would still be shown in the game finder.

This was going to be my comment as well.

I like the original idea. As noted, if you want a variety of maps, just go to "game finder" You can pick all maps with "waiting" as your criteria and you will get what we now see in "join games".

I myself never use join games just because it is so unweildy

[Delete Me]
PLACE THE NAME OF THE SUGGESTION IN THE SUBJECT LINE!

Things to remember when posting a new suggestion are that the dice are random, and that lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and public by community members. Also, please take time to search for previous similar suggestions and, if possible, to check current and archived threads before posting something "new". Delete the xxxxxxx, and substitute your text.

Any questions, contact one of the Suggestions Moderators.
[/Delete Me]


Concise description:

• xxxxxxx

Specifics/Details:

• xxxxxxx

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• xxxxxxx

interesting very interesting...

Lol the body of the suggestion is awesome

I agree with the title though, if a game has 100 percent of its spots reserved it shouldn't come up when lookin for games IMO

very handy suggestion indeed

yeahmandudeguy wrote:
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• xxxxxxx

so this suggestion would make the site 2 & 1/3 times better than porn

hell if thats the case why didn't we implement it yesterday???

greenoaks wrote:

yeahmandudeguy wrote:
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• xxxxxxx

so this suggestion would make the site 2 & 1/3 times better than porn

I am going to give the OP 72 hours to update his first post before it will be archived.

Archived

Heading on two years before this quick request doesn't get fulfilled.

Please quit spam-bumping your thread.

-rd

I'd like to see this as well. I play mostly 2-player public games, and I can't join any of the reserved games. My list usually includes 50-75% reserved games. That seems like a no-brainer for a radio-button filter, right? Thanks!

daveandstine wrote:I'd like to see this as well. I play mostly 2-player public games, and I can't join any of the reserved games. My list usually includes 50-75% reserved games. That seems like a no-brainer for a radio-button filter, right? Thanks!

Okay, my stats were inflated. A recent check showed 18 out of 46 reserved. But that's still worth filtering, I think!

Should have been done a long time ago... A+ Lets Gitter done!!!:idea:

How hard would this be to implement? why don't we add this in?

swimmerdude99 wrote:How hard would this be to implement? why don't we add this in?

I think this is done already. If a game is fully reserved you can't see the whole game anymore...

chapcrap wrote:

swimmerdude99 wrote:How hard would this be to implement? why don't we add this in?

I think this is done already. If a game is fully reserved you can't see the whole game anymore...

I think he's talking about hiding even the mention of it as "fully reserved." Not sure if this is a big problem, but I have wondered why it shows the fully reserved games in the first place.

agentcom wrote:

chapcrap wrote:

swimmerdude99 wrote:How hard would this be to implement? why don't we add this in?

I think this is done already. If a game is fully reserved you can't see the whole game anymore...

I think he's talking about hiding even the mention of it as "fully reserved." Not sure if this is a big problem, but I have wondered why it shows the fully reserved games in the first place.

Well, being reserved doesn't mean it will stay reserved. People can miss invites or decline invites...

Is that something which actually affects any users? Do users write down the game numbers and check back to see if the game has become not fully reserved? I'm not sure what your point is.

chapcrap wrote:

agentcom wrote:

chapcrap wrote:

swimmerdude99 wrote:How hard would this be to implement? why don't we add this in?

I think this is done already. If a game is fully reserved you can't see the whole game anymore...

I think he's talking about hiding even the mention of it as "fully reserved." Not sure if this is a big problem, but I have wondered why it shows the fully reserved games in the first place.

Well, being reserved doesn't mean it will stay reserved. People can miss invites or decline invites...

Is that something which actually affects any users? Do users write down the game numbers and check back to see if the game has become not fully reserved? I'm not sure what your point is.

Honestly that whole page needs a big rework. Right now, the number of games on each page varies with filters (such as identical games, as well as fully reserved ones). These games should be ignored in the SQL fetching the data, thus reducing the overall number of pages in join a game.

Add a choice that says "Available" to Game Status in the GameFinder screen. I hate having games show up under "waiting" games that are completely reserved.

This makes finding joinable games easier as well as inviting players to tourneys or clan games as you can filter out the ones where all invites have been sent.

Good suggestion.