Conquer Club

• A choice that will allow people to select not only a random map, but random settings also.

• Add an option to the Start a Game panel where the game can be COMPLETELY random.

• In tournaments, organizers who host a random tourney and are in it cannot select their preferred settings as the "random" settings.
• It makes more awesome randomness!!!

sully800 wrote:Agreed! This is the ultimate tournament setting.

Even better would be an option to say "Random" for everything, but then if you select an option in addition that once becomes non-random. That way you could have random everything but you'll still know it's a 6 man team game, or you'll still know it's fog of war, or whatever. If you want a completely random game you just wouldn't select any setting besides Random

• Make an option to play a game with Random Settings
• Make a Random Settings Medal

• Make a bottom to play with Random Settings but this doesn`t include the Number of Players or the Round Lenght or the Map
• Make a new medal awarded to members that defeated x unique opponents with Random Settings

• This will benefit to CC by having more types of games
• Also, the players will benefit by playing for having the new medal in his or her Medal Information

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

TheForgivenOne wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

Maybe if you had the option to have option for each field? Like Random for spoils/FoW/Deployment, but Chained reinforcements, etc for everything else.

Woodruff wrote:

TheForgivenOne wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

Maybe if you had the option to have option for each field? Like Random for spoils/FoW/Deployment, but Chained reinforcements, etc for everything else.

If I understand what you're suggesting, have all of the setting choices look exactly as they do now except that EACH setting choice would additionally have "random" added to that setting choice as an option? I like it.

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

Dr.House_25 wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

yah would be interesting, but what happens if you make an 8 players game with random settings and it`s triples, how is that going to work?

Woodruff wrote:

Dr.House_25 wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

yah would be interesting, but what happens if you make an 8 players game with random settings and it`s triples, how is that going to work?

Ah, good question! I guess that would have to be dependent on the number of players. For instance, a six-player game could have doubles, triples, assassin, terminator or standard but a five-player game could only have assassin, terminator or standard.

agentcom wrote:
Number of Players: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [Random]...

Dr.House_25 wrote:

agentcom wrote:
Number of Players: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [Random]...

but what if you do a game for eight players and in the Random settings just say for two players? The others are going to be kicked out of the game? i think that the number of players shouldn`t be random.

agentcom wrote:

Dr.House_25 wrote:

agentcom wrote:
Number of Players: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [Random]...

but what if you do a game for eight players and in the Random settings just say for two players? The others are going to be kicked out of the game? i think that the number of players shouldn`t be random.

Good point. Game options should be:

Number of Players: No changes
Game Type: Standard Terminator Assassin [Random among Std., Term, & Ass.] Doubles Triples Quadruples
Map: No changes
Initial Troops: Automatic Manual [Random]
Play Order: Sequential Freestyle [Random]
Spoils: Escalating Flat Rate Nuclear No Spoils [Random]
Reinforcements: Chained Adjacent Unlimited [Random]
Fog of War: No Yes [Random]
Round Limit: None 20 Rounds 30 Rounds 50 Rounds 100 Rounds [Random]
Round Length: 24 Hours 5 Minutes 4 Minutes 3 Minutes 2 Minutes 1 Minute [Random] [Random Speed]

Dr.House_25 wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Dr.House_25 wrote:

Woodruff wrote:If the "play order" remains, then it's a failed option in my opinion. I want nothing to do with freestyle games, and there would be a significant chance (50-50) that it would wind up as one.

On the other hand, it might be interesting if you included the "game type" as an optionality...you'd not know if the game was going to be doubles, quads (both with random teammates) or terminator...that could be VERY interesting.

yah would be interesting, but what happens if you make an 8 players game with random settings and it`s triples, how is that going to work?

Ah, good question! I guess that would have to be dependent on the number of players. For instance, a six-player game could have doubles, triples, assassin, terminator or standard but a five-player game could only have assassin, terminator or standard.

i guess that could be an interesting thing that can have the random settings, but it will have to have some rules like:

2 players: Game Type: standard
3 players:Game type:Standard, Terminator, Assasin
4 players: Game Type:Standard, Terminator,Assasin, Doubles
5 players: Game Type: Standard, Terminator, Assasin
6 platers Game Type: Standard, Terminator, Assasin, Doubles, Triples
7 players: Game Type: Standard, Terminator, Assasin
8 players: Game Type: Standard, Terminator, Assasin, Doubles, Quadruples

But then,the number of players, the Map and the Round lenght i think that they can`t be changed.

SirSebstar wrote:I don't think this is going to happen, if only for the very simple reason that either all settings are in or there wont be a medal. comparable to getting hive on random

chapcrap wrote:I agree with Sebstar. I don't think I am in favor of this much. A little too wacky for me. I do love medals though.

medals
your avatar
House M.D.

The various problems that this presents.
I don't think there should be a different medals for each random.
I don't think that there are enough options for Random to be warranted.

chapcrap wrote:I agree with Sebstar. I don't think I am in favor of this much. A little too wacky for me. I do love medals though.

Woodruff wrote:

chapcrap wrote:I agree with Sebstar. I don't think I am in favor of this much. A little too wacky for me. I do love medals though.

See, I don't care about medals at all. But I like this suggestion (with of course MY additions to it). It seems like it would be a lot of fun.