Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1
GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833
chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
betiko wrote:chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.
Nobody on this site can properly play 20, 8 player esc speed games simultaneously, including you. Who the f*ck you think you talking too?chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.
Then don't join those games against them...
GeneralRisk wrote:Nobody on this site can properly play 20, 8 player esc speed games simultaneously, including you. Who the f*ck you think you talking too?chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 9&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.
Then don't join those games against them...
sorry but you sometimes play turns in 15s and in others you need to click and think, mostly on large maps. When you have like 6 player games with a couple of players making you wait 3-4 mins each time they are being annoying to their opponents. 4-5 minutes turns doesn t mean it s cool to show up for the last 30s and you are not going to foe them all. Let s just be civil and not f*ck up a game fluidity just because you don t care of what it s like to have such opponents.chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
Other than this it s highly annoying when your opponent is on 10 games at a time and makes you wait 4mins each turn to start just because he can.
Then don't join those games against them...
betiko wrote:When you have like 6 player games with a couple of players making you wait 3-4 mins each time they are being annoying to their opponents. 4-5 minutes turns doesn t mean it s cool to show up for the last 30s and you are not going to foe them all. Let s just be civil and not f*ck up a game fluidity just because you don t care of what it s like to have such opponents.
chapcrap wrote:Just play 2 minute games if you don't want to wait... There are options for everyone. Limiting people who want to have 10 games waiting at once and are paying for the privilege, seems wrong to me. If you don't want to join their games, then don't. No one is forcing you.
betiko wrote:You are a bad example chap because you admited the other day you had more games that you could handle, yet you register in mafia games you don t even play...
jdw35 wrote:People pay money to have the ability to play speed games. There shouldnt be a restriction on how many they can create. its their own fault if they get into too many games, and the result is possibly losing the majority of those games. if they make a ton of games for the purpose of point dumping then we all know what happens to them. I think the current system works just fine.
chapcrap wrote:betiko wrote:NOt a bad idea given recent point dumper cases creating like 20 1vs1GeneralRisk wrote:It is a good idea to put a cap on speed games. Maybe 8 games or even as many as 10. Recently Kingfisher decided to point dump and set 30 some odd games......Kingfisher was vacationed but the site did nothing to cryinglion who profited from 24 dead beated games or to tank21 who profited from at least 8 DB ed games......viewtopic.php?f=239&t=182833
So, we already have a punishment system in place. Maybe someone should create a C&A case against cryinlion and tank21...
Why do we need to restrict players who want to play that many at once? An isolated case of someone getting cranky doesn't really seem like a good reason to me. I could easily play twenty 8 player games at 5 minute turns.
jdw35 wrote:People pay money to have the ability to play speed games. There shouldnt be a restriction on how many they can create. its their own fault if they get into too many games, and the result is possibly losing the majority of those games. if they make a ton of games for the purpose of point dumping then we all know what happens to them. I think the current system works just fine.
HardAttack wrote:Also, we have got 50 casual games limit, so ?
Metsfanmax wrote:It sounds as though if we implemented this, we would want to set the cap high enough that a person could reasonably play in that many games, but low enough to prevent massive point dumping. My guess is that ten games is a reasonable compromise; I doubt there are very many people who could play more than ten games at once, and even if they can, this isn't stopping them from doing so; it's just stopping them from having more than 10 waiting at once.
Metsfanmax wrote:It sounds as though if we implemented this, we would want to set the cap high enough that a person could reasonably play in that many games, but low enough to prevent massive point dumping. My guess is that ten games is a reasonable compromise; I doubt there are very many people who could play more than ten games at once, and even if they can, this isn't stopping them from doing so; it's just stopping them from having more than 10 waiting at once.
greenoaks wrote:point dumping is not a problem so there is nothing to fix.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users