Conquer Club

cooldeals wrote:This would be a tragedy for the Society of Cooks training program. They'd have no one to teach.

qwert wrote:little experiments on how ranks will could look in diferent angles

Funkyterrance wrote:Definitely prefer the first. However, it seems like there could be an even better way? What about vertical?

Conquer Club members are initially given a score of 1000. At the end of each game, the winner takes points away from each loser. The points to be awarded is calculated as (loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent.

rdsrds2120 wrote:Concerning the rank system, graphically, we'll be staying the same unless something wild happens. As for new ranks, maybe, but I feel that this is mostly preference, and that most people don't mine either way in the grand scheme of all things Conquer Club.

Fewnix wrote:I urge those who like the current ranking system for themselves to allow options for others. That is why I agreed with the concept of 3 different Military Paths, each with its own rank.and voted Yes the old path should still be an option (4-Path),

There are people who do not like their rank to be based on the current points system:

Conquer Club members are initially given a score of 1000. At the end of each game, the winner takes points away from each loser. The points to be awarded is calculated as (loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent.

and they should have the right to be ranked differently, while those who like the old ways can still be ranked the old way.

One suggestion I find interesting is that points be awarded on a straight 20 points gain for a win, a straight 20 points loss for a defeat . So both a cook (5 finished games, minimum score 1) and a colonel (100 finished games, minimum score, 2500 points) in a 6 player game, standard setting, would gain 100 points for 5 wins by being the last one standing and lose 20 points if eliminated I may not chose this option for my ranking but would allow others the right.

Why not allow different ranking systems for those who chose different paths, say those who"enlist" joining a clan and going to war? The score is calculated per team in team games so it should be possible to get as an option a ranking system tied into clan wars or various Leagues, Conquer Cups?

Bottom line: we are talking about allowing different options> Please vote Yes.

No, the ranks are fine as they are - 47%

morleyjoe wrote:

No, the ranks are fine as they are - 47%

I have to agree with the majority on this one. Good work, but Sorry qwert

silversun6 wrote:

morleyjoe wrote:

No, the ranks are fine as they are - 47%

I have to agree with the majority on this one. Good work, but Sorry qwert

isnt the 53% who want to change it is the majority ? O_o

silversun6 wrote:

morleyjoe wrote:

No, the ranks are fine as they are - 47%

I have to agree with the majority on this one. Good work, but Sorry qwert

isnt the 53% who want to change it is the majority ? O_o

silversun6 wrote:

morleyjoe wrote:

No, the ranks are fine as they are - 47%

I have to agree with the majority on this one. Good work, but Sorry qwert

isnt the 53% who want to change it is the majority ? O_o

Agent 86 wrote:Yes it's difficult with this poll to gauge anything actually. Small percentage of voters as well..current membership number of 13729.

Qwert wrote:

Agent 86 wrote:Yes it's difficult with this poll to gauge anything actually. Small percentage of voters as well..current membership number of 13729.

well its going down when we speak,, need more and fast new implementations. I dont know if these will attract more new players, but i think its worth to try.