samuelc812 wrote:People who voted for Maps 1, 2, 4 and 6 know they can't win so change your vote to 5 as it is surely the next best thing
That's what he meant to say. I fully agree with you.
Moderator: Cartographers
samuelc812 wrote:People who voted for Maps 1, 2, 4 and 6 know they can't win so change your vote to 5 as it is surely the next best thing
the.killing.44 wrote:Wow. We really do need a runoff.
Mjinga wrote:Since it won by a huge margin last round, does the win stick?
MrBenn wrote:Or we could run another snap-poll with just the two favourites, to see which is most popular overall.... See what the 40% who have not voted for those two actually think...
MrBenn wrote:Or we could run another snap-poll with just the two favourites, to see which is most popular overall.... See what the 40% who have not voted for those two actually think...
RjBeals wrote:Map-5 has nothing on Map-3. it just doesn't make sense to me.
RjBeals wrote:Map-5 has nothing on Map-3. it just doesn't make sense to me.
edbeard wrote:what's the point of doing a contest if we're going to get something like map 5? it's foundry passable but not exciting or anything better than average. no spin. nothing new or different. fine for someone doing their own map. for a contest you want something different. something that approaches special.
rustlemania wrote:Darnit! Too late to vote - i gotta find more time in the week to get into the foundry!
How many days am I late by?
MrBenn wrote:The winning mapmaker will be announced - it will be up to the other entrants to disclose their identity should they choose... At least that's what happened with the Brazil revamp competition...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users