Conquer Club

suggestion: 9 player option

Just so that I can be the one who started this thread...

no. nine's too much.

well obviosly it'd be stupid for a free for all, but it would essentialy be the same a a 3 player game, with 3 minds playing each part. would be best for world 2.1 and the likes...

Mr_Adams wrote:well obviosly it'd be stupid for a free for all, but it would essentialy be the same a a 3 player game, with 3 minds playing each part. would be best for world 2.1 and the likes...

well ok let me restart.

Its a good idea, though we're just pushing the limit on number of people per game. People can then argue for quintuples or 5 double team games. I also don't think that the time it would take to play a game would be appealing. i started a sequential 8 player game 3 or 4 days ago and it wasn't until late yesterday when i was able to take my first turn.

Theory's good, but i don't think it'll be popular among the fanbase

um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-

Russianfire8371 wrote:

soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-

I ment that post towards mr adams

soundout9 wrote:

Russianfire8371 wrote:

soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-

I ment that post towards mr adams

my reply was towards Mr. Adams

Russianfire8371 wrote:

soundout9 wrote:

Russianfire8371 wrote:

soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-

I ment that post towards mr adams

my reply was towards Mr. Adams

I know...and so was mine..

hey, it was just a thought thrown out for discussion... I don't play teams OR games with more than 4 players (most the time, I do want to try a quad game though...) I don't want, it was just an idea.

I will no longer be using this thread, so you don't need to direct posts at me.

I like the idea of 3 vs 3 vs 3

3 vs 3 vs 3 would be wicked, but...... i dont see that happening for some time.... we must appreciate the piece of pie we've been given, because if we eat the whole pie all at once, we wont have an opportunity to cherish every single god damn bite

The problem with more players is that the colours get more confusing.

It has been sugested it would it take a bunch of coding to do.


Concise description:

• add a couple more options to the max # of players allowed

Specifics:

• I'd like to see 12 and it works with all the current game types, 12 singles, 6 doubles teams, 4 triples teams, 3 quad teams.
• increments would be fine.
• 9
• 10
• send me money
• Here's 12 distinct colours with different letters for "add color codes"
  red r
  green g
  blue b
  yellow y
  pink p
  cyan c
  orange o
  silver s
  maroon m
  lime l
  violet v
  drab d

This will improve the following aspects of the site:

You can do more than two team triples and quad games.
Might make some cool tourneys also.

I think one of the new maps (New World) has 9 starting positions so 9 players might be good for that one. Can't see it working for the smaller maps though.

true, especially for doodle earth
but I guess for most maps it's still okay

Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

jnd94 wrote:

max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

I'd like 9 player games so you could have free triples.

I'd like 9 player games so you could have three triples.

Before you could even consider this, you'd have to find color codes that are unique and different enough from the current ones we have.

I'm also afraid that 9 and 10 player games...on maps, would be simply be down to the luck of who gets to go first.


--Andy

I've often wondered why we didn't have 9 player games when we expanded to 7 and 8, to allow three triples teams...

I think 10 player games would be pushing it though.

westsidekilla6 wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

But he said age of might......

jnd94 wrote:

westsidekilla6 wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

But he said age of might......

.......