Moderator: Community Team
The Voice wrote:I actually did mean to say that each turn within a round would be picked randomly.
A player who is chosen to take the last turn in the round should probably not be able to randomly be picked to take the first turn in the next round
blakebowling wrote:I like this suggestion, assuming that the player that went last would not be able to go first in the next round.
Evil Semp wrote:blakebowling wrote:I like this suggestion, assuming that the player that went last would not be able to go first in the next round.
If you take away the last player in a rounds chance of going first in the next round then it really isn't random. If you want to make it random, then make it random.
I can see an 8 player game, and it will happen, that the first player will have to wait 2 weeks because new recruits or cooks joined the game and never come back.
rdsrds2120 wrote:Well, this would be incredibly luck based as it is then possible for, in an 8 player game, some players would get the opportunity to go two times before a different player got their second turn. I think I would become quite annoyed with this option - but let's leave it to community to decide.
-rd
rdsrds2120 wrote:Well, this would be incredibly luck based as it is then possible for, in an 8 player game, some players would get the opportunity to go two times before a different player got their second turn. I think I would become quite annoyed with this option - but let's leave it to community to decide.
-rd
rdsrds2120 wrote:Well, this would be incredibly luck based as it is then possible for, in an 8 player game, some players would get the opportunity to go two times before a different player got their second turn. I think I would become quite annoyed with this option - but let's leave it to community to decide.
-rd
greenoaks wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Well, this would be incredibly luck based as it is then possible for, in an 8 player game, some players would get the opportunity to go two times before a different player got their second turn. I think I would become quite annoyed with this option - but let's leave it to community to decide.
-rd
that happens now in freestyle
Evil Semp wrote:blakebowling wrote:I like this suggestion, assuming that the player that went last would not be able to go first in the next round.
If you take away the last player in a rounds chance of going first in the next round then it really isn't random. If you want to make it random, then make it random.
Evil Semp wrote:I can see an 8 player game, and it will happen, that the first player will have to wait 2 weeks because new recruits or cooks joined the game and never come back.
greenoaks wrote:rdsrds2120 wrote:Well, this would be incredibly luck based as it is then possible for, in an 8 player game, some players would get the opportunity to go two times before a different player got their second turn. I think I would become quite annoyed with this option - but let's leave it to community to decide.
-rd
that happens now in freestyle
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
agentcom wrote:Cool idea. In your second option where the turn order is random, would it be completely random or only random within each round? That is, could a player play twice or more (or not play at all) in a given "round"? I like the idea either way, but I would think that a completely random system may cause problems with the round numbering system that is used for all the games (i.e. in a six player game is round 1 over when six turns have been taken or when all six players have played at least once?).
chapcrap wrote:agentcom wrote:Cool idea. In your second option where the turn order is random, would it be completely random or only random within each round? That is, could a player play twice or more (or not play at all) in a given "round"? I like the idea either way, but I would think that a completely random system may cause problems with the round numbering system that is used for all the games (i.e. in a six player game is round 1 over when six turns have been taken or when all six players have played at least once?).
Has to be random within a round. Someone getting 2 turns in a round and the other person getting none isn't fair at all.
agentcom wrote:chapcrap wrote:agentcom wrote:Cool idea. In your second option where the turn order is random, would it be completely random or only random within each round? That is, could a player play twice or more (or not play at all) in a given "round"? I like the idea either way, but I would think that a completely random system may cause problems with the round numbering system that is used for all the games (i.e. in a six player game is round 1 over when six turns have been taken or when all six players have played at least once?).
Has to be random within a round. Someone getting 2 turns in a round and the other person getting none isn't fair at all.
If it's random than it's completely fair. Just like dice and cards.
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
DoomYoshi wrote:agentcom wrote:chapcrap wrote:agentcom wrote:Cool idea. In your second option where the turn order is random, would it be completely random or only random within each round? That is, could a player play twice or more (or not play at all) in a given "round"? I like the idea either way, but I would think that a completely random system may cause problems with the round numbering system that is used for all the games (i.e. in a six player game is round 1 over when six turns have been taken or when all six players have played at least once?).
Has to be random within a round. Someone getting 2 turns in a round and the other person getting none isn't fair at all.
If it's random than it's completely fair. Just like dice and cards.
Fair by opportunity in an abstract way. It is not fair by outcome or fair by opportunity in a concrete way. Also, while it may be "fair" in some specific sense of the word, it won't be fun, in any sense of the word.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users