Moderator: Community Team
Gilligan wrote:I have rolled 2028245 dice
16.38% 1s
16.79% 2s
16.65% 3s
16.79% 4s
16.75% 5s
16.62% 6s
In a perfect world, they should all be 16.66%
While the actual quantity of numbers rolled may differ by a few thousand, it hardly makes a difference percentage-wise, only 0.41% in greatest difference.
My opponents have rolled 1940030 dice
16.36% 1s
16.76% 2s
16.68% 3s
16.77% 4s
16.70% 5s
16.70% 6s
shockingly close.
Gilligan wrote:I have rolled 2028245 dice
16.38% 1s
16.79% 2s
16.65% 3s
16.79% 4s
16.75% 5s
16.62% 6s
In a perfect world, they should all be 16.66%
While the actual quantity of numbers rolled may differ by a few thousand, it hardly makes a difference percentage-wise, only 0.41% in greatest difference.
My opponents have rolled 1940030 dice
16.36% 1s
16.76% 2s
16.68% 3s
16.77% 4s
16.70% 5s
16.70% 6s
shockingly close.
BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
Gilligan wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
according to your dice stats, you roll 3 the most yet it doesn't have the largest percentage (unless you're including opponents?)
BigBallinStalin wrote:Gilligan wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
according to your dice stats, you roll 3 the most yet it doesn't have the largest percentage (unless you're including opponents?)
That's one possibility!
loutil wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Gilligan wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
according to your dice stats, you roll 3 the most yet it doesn't have the largest percentage (unless you're including opponents?)
That's one possibility!
The other is that you are a lying communist bastard
BigBallinStalin wrote:loutil wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Gilligan wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
according to your dice stats, you roll 3 the most yet it doesn't have the largest percentage (unless you're including opponents?)
That's one possibility!
The other is that you are a lying communist bastard
In school, I learned Soviet Economics. It is superior to Western Economics!
loutil wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:loutil wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Gilligan wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:15.21% 1s
16.17% 2s
16.44% 3s
16.76% 4s
17.14% 5s
17.50% 6s
according to your dice stats, you roll 3 the most yet it doesn't have the largest percentage (unless you're including opponents?)
That's one possibility!
The other is that you are a lying communist bastard
In school, I learned Soviet Economics. It is superior to Western Economics!
Most people would not consider a Gulag to be school...
betiko wrote:Gilligan wrote:I have rolled 2028245 dice
16.38% 1s
16.79% 2s
16.65% 3s
16.79% 4s
16.75% 5s
16.62% 6s
In a perfect world, they should all be 16.66%
While the actual quantity of numbers rolled may differ by a few thousand, it hardly makes a difference percentage-wise, only 0.41% in greatest difference.
My opponents have rolled 1940030 dice
16.36% 1s
16.76% 2s
16.68% 3s
16.77% 4s
16.70% 5s
16.70% 6s
shockingly close.
Yes and we all have something similar. Loutil seems to say the same thing, and the very common 3.51 average proves there is a problem and those dice are biaised (although i personally roll 3.50 average and my opponents 3.51 lol).
I am pretty sure that it s the way the program works and that they tried to roll slightly less 1s as it s supposed to annoy the most. As a result, not having fair dice annoys people even more. And each time we calculate odds, they are wrong as they are based on fair dice, but the dice we play with are biaised.
Oh, and totally missed the thread you are talking about.
Kaskavel wrote:betiko wrote:Gilligan wrote:I have rolled 2028245 dice
16.38% 1s
16.79% 2s
16.65% 3s
16.79% 4s
16.75% 5s
16.62% 6s
In a perfect world, they should all be 16.66%
While the actual quantity of numbers rolled may differ by a few thousand, it hardly makes a difference percentage-wise, only 0.41% in greatest difference.
My opponents have rolled 1940030 dice
16.36% 1s
16.76% 2s
16.68% 3s
16.77% 4s
16.70% 5s
16.70% 6s
shockingly close.
Yes and we all have something similar. Loutil seems to say the same thing, and the very common 3.51 average proves there is a problem and those dice are biaised (although i personally roll 3.50 average and my opponents 3.51 lol).
I am pretty sure that it s the way the program works and that they tried to roll slightly less 1s as it s supposed to annoy the most. As a result, not having fair dice annoys people even more. And each time we calculate odds, they are wrong as they are based on fair dice, but the dice we play with are biaised.
Oh, and totally missed the thread you are talking about.
The assumption that deliberately reducing 1s by that percentage hoping players will notice less 1s and thus get less frustrated, as well as the assumption that players do notice such a disturbance and complain because of it are similar to the probability of spreading pure materials in a field, hoping a strong wind will blow, twisting them around and making them form a fully operational, fully fueled and ready for take-off airplane full of living passengers.
betiko wrote:Kaskavel wrote:betiko wrote:Gilligan wrote:I have rolled 2028245 dice
16.38% 1s
16.79% 2s
16.65% 3s
16.79% 4s
16.75% 5s
16.62% 6s
In a perfect world, they should all be 16.66%
While the actual quantity of numbers rolled may differ by a few thousand, it hardly makes a difference percentage-wise, only 0.41% in greatest difference.
My opponents have rolled 1940030 dice
16.36% 1s
16.76% 2s
16.68% 3s
16.77% 4s
16.70% 5s
16.70% 6s
shockingly close.
Yes and we all have something similar. Loutil seems to say the same thing, and the very common 3.51 average proves there is a problem and those dice are biaised (although i personally roll 3.50 average and my opponents 3.51 lol).
I am pretty sure that it s the way the program works and that they tried to roll slightly less 1s as it s supposed to annoy the most. As a result, not having fair dice annoys people even more. And each time we calculate odds, they are wrong as they are based on fair dice, but the dice we play with are biaised.
Oh, and totally missed the thread you are talking about.
The assumption that deliberately reducing 1s by that percentage hoping players will notice less 1s and thus get less frustrated, as well as the assumption that players do notice such a disturbance and complain because of it are similar to the probability of spreading pure materials in a field, hoping a strong wind will blow, twisting them around and making them form a fully operational, fully fueled and ready for take-off airplane full of living passengers.
So where exactly do you stand here? Do the stats, or read the stats. It s a fact. 1s are not represented as they should. The general dice average on the site is 3.51 and it proves there is a bias.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users