Conquer Club

It does, my friend had 99% and one day it was back to 100% which annoyed me then, as it still does now.
Even 1 missed turn ever should place a 99% record limit for ever, surely?

could you please tell me why I should care?

riskllama wrote:could you please tell me why I should care?

If mathematical integrity means nothing to you then no i can't.

Lord+Master wrote:

riskllama wrote:could you please tell me why I should care?

If mathematical integrity means nothing to you then no i can't.

There’s a mathematical concept called rounding. So if you have 99.4% you’ll be shown as 99%. If you get it back to 99.5+% you’ll go back up.

Mathematical integrity still intact.

Lord+Master wrote:

riskllama wrote:could you please tell me why I should care?

If mathematical integrity means nothing to you then no i can't.

99.0 to 99.4% of turns taken rounds down to 99%

99.5 to 99.9% of turns taken rounds up to 100%



Someone who claims to care about mathematical integrity should understand this.

Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Lord+Master wrote:It does, my friend had 99% and one day it was back to 100% which annoyed me then, as it still does now.
Even 1 missed turn ever should place a 99% record limit for ever, surely?

Must suck to be your friend

Lord+Master wrote:Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Well, i have 10 015 games played and 5 695 wins as of right now, yet it says 57% win rate. How is that any different?
Do you see a decimal coma on these %? No, right? Then stop being such a nit picking asshole about your "friend".

demonfork wrote:Someone who claims to care about mathematical integrity should understand this.

It's not about you, you mathematical dick.

There's only one significant digit in 100. If we really wanted to get technical, everyone over 50 has 100.

Metsfanmax wrote:

demonfork wrote:Someone who claims to care about mathematical integrity should understand this.

It's not about you, you mathematical dick.

That was uncalled for Sheldon !!!!!!!

----------It is not like we are given perfect attendance awards....Wait ...should we be getting perfect attendance medals/awards or conquer credits? ......Like once a year...Then everyone's attendance will go back to 100%...You know like school or in places of work,where people are rewarded for not missing time.......But of course there will be those who are the skipping kind or the I don't feel like going in kind...they can get special medals of their own... ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

betiko wrote:

Lord+Master wrote:Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Well, i have 10 015 games played and 5 695 wins as of right now, yet it says 57% win rate. How is that any different?
Do you see a decimal coma on these %? No, right? Then stop being such a nit picking asshole about your "friend".

How is your example not different? Win rate being rounded isn't particularly misleading, having 100% attendance yet having missed turns is blatantly misleading.
The whole thing of 100% is it equates to perfect, you see someone with 100% record and think they've never missed a turn yet clearly we now know this isn't always the case. Which is bollocks, nit-picking arsehole or not it's bollocks!

Metsfanmax wrote:

demonfork wrote:Someone who claims to care about mathematical integrity should understand this.

It's not about you, you mathematical dick.

Look at me son!!

it’s not your fault!!!!!!

betiko wrote:

Lord+Master wrote:Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Well, i have 10 015 games played and 5 695 wins as of right now, yet it says 57% win rate. How is that any different?
Do you see a decimal coma on these %? No, right? Then stop being such a nit picking asshole about your "friend".

How much worse is a decimal coma compared to a regular one?

iAmCaffeine wrote:

betiko wrote:

Lord+Master wrote:Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Well, i have 10 015 games played and 5 695 wins as of right now, yet it says 57% win rate. How is that any different?
Do you see a decimal coma on these %? No, right? Then stop being such a nit picking asshole about your "friend".

How much worse is a decimal coma compared to a regular one?

Well a coma with a decimal if you prefer... not a millionial. But it could work too.

Lord+Master wrote:

betiko wrote:

Lord+Master wrote:Whilst the lessons on rounding are well received my issue is merely that no rounding should occur above 99% as having 100% attendance while still having missed turns is just wrong, abhorrently so.

Well, i have 10 015 games played and 5 695 wins as of right now, yet it says 57% win rate. How is that any different?
Do you see a decimal coma on these %? No, right? Then stop being such a nit picking asshole about your "friend".

How is your example not different? Win rate being rounded isn't particularly misleading, having 100% attendance yet having missed turns is blatantly misleading.
The whole thing of 100% is it equates to perfect, you see someone with 100% record and think they've never missed a turn yet clearly we now know this isn't always the case. Which is bollocks, nit-picking arsehole or not it's bollocks!

In that case, you should complain about all these guys with a 5.0 rating only because it got rounded up after susan from accountings rated them all 4/4/4 just to piss those 5.0 off.

lol @ this entire thread.

I think I'm heading for a decimal coma.

BrutalBob wrote:

Lord+Master wrote:It does, my friend had 99% and one day it was back to 100% which annoyed me then, as it still does now.
Even 1 missed turn ever should place a 99% record limit for ever, surely?

Must suck to be your friend

I suspect their friend is big enough not to care about the .4%

I've missed a few turns... round me down to 99% CC.. round me down.

ps. I am the friend hes talking about... we go way back.

It should round you down! That would be more accurate.

I suppose what it boils down to is that, like a lot of you, the case of 100% needs to be treated as if it were special.

Huh, it rounded up on me too. I never noticed because unless it's showing something much lower than 97% it just means you missed a turn for some reason.

It's not like you are someone that may not show up half the time.

36% of turns taken. That makes me wonder, who has the worst attendance?

I agree with OP.