Re: (Thread of CC Records) 1st 5's & TOP 5's
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
he would put a * next to the persons name - dont know if he will do that to himself.......
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31210
nagerous wrote:
I imagine those to be fake ages.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Who is going to spend the time to add all the " * " ?
OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
Rodion wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
He'll make a distinction between "cheating to achieve a record" and "cheating after achieving the record". That distinction will save him from asterisks or deletions, obviously, since this is his thread.
White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
Robinette wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
I am confused...
So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...
skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0
Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.
King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes
and i compared those to recent events...
Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...
So is what Blitz has done considered mild hypocrisy? or was it outright duplicity?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...
Robinette wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
I am confused...
So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...
skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0
Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.
King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes
and i compared those to recent events...
Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...
So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...
Robinette wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
I am confused...
So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...
skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0
Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.
King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes
and i compared those to recent events...
Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...
So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...
demonfork wrote:Robinette wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
I am confused...
So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...
skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0
Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.
King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes
and i compared those to recent events...
Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...
So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...
The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...
herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.
As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.
King_Herpes wrote:demonfork wrote:Robinette wrote:White Moose wrote:He won't even get asteriks. He cheated, which means he should be removed all together.OP wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
I am confused...
So i get that convicted cheaters are not on these lists at all...
And the * is for more mild abuse,Blitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
So i decided to look up those 3 players that blitz felt needed to have an asterisk...
skyT had 5 different accusations in the C&A thread with just 1 resulting in a warning.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=31428&hilit=skyT&start=0
Karelpietertje had 5 different accusations as well, and yet, not ONE resulted in a warning.
King Herpes had 4 different accusations which resulted in 1 warning...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=100414&start=0&hilit=King+Herpes
and i compared those to recent events...
Blitzaholic has had 3 accusations, which have resulted in 1 warning AND 1 30 day vacation ban...
The Warning: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=141310
The 30 ban: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=143145&start=145
although, to be fair,,, these were related to the same transgressions...
So is what Blitz has done considered mild abuse? or was it cheating?
I realize there are some semantics here, but honestly, where do you draw the line...
The accusation made against herp and myself and the resulting "stern warning" given (after a second evaluation, first go we were cleared and noted) was for verbal "abuse" and not for cheating...
herps was bestowed with his beloved asterisk long before this "abuse" case ever made it to C&A.
As far as sitz's case...he was busted for cheating not abuse...therefore he needs to remove his own ass from his own list.
Blitz* actually told me* that he* denounced my name due to an ancient incident in which I* had sent an instant invite link into a difficult map via private message. Two invisible people were sent the invite, one of which I* had met in live chat.
What he* had misrenembered to acknowledge during *our* private moment of confidence was that people were waiting for me* to slip up for quite some time. He* was merely carrying out his duly duties of catering to the cries of the public. He* always meets the public's needs. You* invisible people are uneducated on the matter simply because the mass paranoia machine that is....... 'Duuuhnnndugnduuuuhhhhnnnn'!!!!!!!! CHEATING & ABUSE!!!1!!!ONEHUNDREDANDELEVEN! never broadcasted it. That is because I* neutralized it using clutch skills of diplomacy and beurocratic lobbying that I* previously had learnt from engaging in the game of RISKĀ®.
Okay okay I* put the guys kid through college, get over it!!
I* believe I* was petting my cat angrily while cursing at the monitor in my Mother's basement, pulling my hair out, gritting my teeth and wearing open sores on my palms from clenching my fist in disbelief of the di when Blitz* despairingly gave it reason. My eyes turned red. I* tore out my cats diminutive spine and ate it's innards in what was somewhat of an overreaction. You see my invisible friends, upon reflection I* miss my little kitty. I* also miss the days where players waited until referees(moderus adminii) made the call.
As many people noted to point out before me*, this is just a list compiled from one players perspective. Never meant jack dick to me*. He* can take mine off and give himself** two for all I* care.
owenshooter wrote:at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex
ljex wrote:owenshooter wrote:at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex
like it or not blitz does run this thread and as such has the right to do what he wants with it...besides this is not where you should be trying to get him to remove himself as none of his records here were a result of the above mentioned cheating
ljex wrote:owenshooter wrote:at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex
like it or not blitz does run this thread and as such has the right to do what he wants with it...besides this is not where you should be trying to get him to remove himself as none of his records here were a result of the above mentioned cheating
Sitzaholic wrote:Forms of abuse will have an asterik *, and cheaters are non-existent!
owenshooter wrote:at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex
chipv wrote:owenshooter wrote:at what point does this get *mod edited*? it is crystal clear what needs to occur, and i doubt the person that should do it is going to ever admit any wrong doing and remove himself from this thread, per his own rules.-the black celebrex
It won't get edited as that will derail one of the most interesting topics of discussion, possibly ever, on Conquer Club.
Sit down and eat some popcorn, the discussion about editing the thread is much more interesting than someone actually doing it.