Re: Unternehmen Michael: Day 2... a quiet night?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:52 am
So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=610&t=227361
strike wolf wrote:We can't afford to no lynch until we get a result. We didn't lynch yesterday and it put us in this crap position where we Are still searching for a legitimate case to explore.
Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
Pikanchion wrote:Well as I have already stated, I believe that the standard way of lynching is greatly hampered by the HP system, so I have little desire to really pressure people at this point.
dakky21 wrote:Skoffin wrote:Anyway, I think the real question here is why, when Doom explicitly said not to try playing the mod, that dakky immediately went to playing the mod.
Don't I do that in every game?
Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
strike wolf wrote:To be brief, my secondary win con encourages me to be careful with my vote.
DoomYoshi wrote:The night was quiet. By design or by default, most of the commanders were more focused on their own activities than on the activities of anyone else. There are however, the evidences of an experiment during the night. A mad scientist perhaps?
Skoffin wrote:dakky21 wrote:Skoffin wrote:Anyway, I think the real question here is why, when Doom explicitly said not to try playing the mod, that dakky immediately went to playing the mod.
Don't I do that in every game?
Yes, but typically in those games mods have not explicitly warned against it. Why play the mod when you have been explicitly warned that the mod has accounted for such things and will make it detrimental to town?
The only real benefit of doing that this game is to keep up appearances from other games and to more likely pass as town.
dakky21 wrote:Well, I am town (but an uncommon role) so my appearance to pass as town is normal. I do have an investigative role but won't say yet anything about it.
ZaBeast wrote:Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
An inactivity-based vote seems a bit weak. I thought you believed it was better to replace an inactive than to lynch him anyways (I can probably find a post if need be). So why directly vote Aage (as in not asking for him to be replaced/prodded prior)?
Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
aage wrote:Dakky, ...really?
Pikanchion wrote:I don't see any distinction between questioning and applying pressure and the difference between suspecting openly and calling for a lynch on somebody is different only in directness, questioning and suspecting somebody openly would directly increase the likelihood that person is lynched if my observations are convincing. I want to No Lynch (or lynch after a Mass Claim or similar), so increasing the chances that somebody is lynched today in the normal way is at odds with that.
I guess I'll share the reverse though; I think dakky21 and strike wolf are town. Everybody else I'm on the fence or worse.
ZaBeast wrote:Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
An inactivity-based vote seems a bit weak. I thought you believed it was better to replace an inactive than to lynch him anyways (I can probably find a post if need be). So why directly vote Aage (as in not asking for him to be replaced/prodded prior)?
strike wolf wrote:To be brief, my secondary win con encourages me to be careful with my vote.
If you really want a lynch to happen, you should place your vote somewhere. Though tbh, I don't think we'll get to a lynch today either way (and a speed lynch is never a great idea anyways)
@the whole pika thing + no-lynchDoomYoshi wrote:The night was quiet. By design or by default, most of the commanders were more focused on their own activities than on the activities of anyone else. There are however, the evidences of an experiment during the night. A mad scientist perhaps?
I take that flavor as hinting to the fact town doesn't have many investigative roles. Don't think waiting for results is the best approach. We should get lynching soon.
aage wrote:Ragian wrote:So why aren't you voting for either of them?
Vote Aage - hasn't said diddly for ages.
I deserve this, I haven't posted for a week. Been a little busy IRL.
ZaBeast, voting for people cause they're not posting is normal, and considering the state of the game it's not really 'weak'. It's better than nothing.
Dakky, ...really?
I don't want to encourage speed lynching so I won't place my vote, but the case on Pika did pique my interest. I think that throwing in the towel so early (re:no lynch) is a bad idea, I said that a week ago as well. Waiting for the cop is just a bad strategy, and we don't even know if we have one. Several people are advocating this now and the days are kinda being wasted by that whole discussion. We need to put this to bed and start lynching.
strike wolf wrote:Well assuming hes telling the truth, Dakky just screwed himself.
/snip/
Frankly no lynching isn't working on any level. Town is barely any closer to finding scum than we were at the beginning of day 1 and in fact, if Dakky is telling the truth, he may have just helped us take a step backwards. On a different level, I do honestly believe that the lack of lynching is killing the game itself.
@dakky: Is asking scummy as an adjective against the rules of your role?
dakky21 wrote:The three "smartest" players were so far: DDS, Ragian and ZaBeast.
Since Ragian was killed, maybe we should look into what he said so far? Maybe flavor thing? Maybe his vote on aage? I don't know tbh.