Re: Chess Mafia [Day 4 - 7/9 alive]
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:44 pm
It also doesn't MAKE you any less wrong then you were then.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=610&t=224274
mandalorian2298 wrote:@Zabeast
The fact that
A) the three people who are currently voting Mitch and not Dakky are
B) THE EXACTLY SAME THREE PLAYERS who, on Day 2, were voting Mitch and not Thorth,
underlines just how right I am. Again.
ZaBeast wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:@Zabeast
The fact that
A) the three people who are currently voting Mitch and not Dakky are
B) THE EXACTLY SAME THREE PLAYERS who, on Day 2, were voting Mitch and not Thorth,
underlines just how right I am. Again.
Well, the other people are skoffin (mute), you, pika (only does what he wants) and mitch. You not voting mitch is like a self-fulfilling prophesy. Obviously no "new blood" (by that I mean other voters) won't vote mitch because none can/care. Besides, your point doesn't prove that mitch isn't scum. I remember you said at some point that mitch and thor voting each other doesn't mean only one of them has to be scum. We need all four of us (because we can't expect pika to act normally) to vote the same person. Rag won't vote dakky (and I'm not a fan either). I could switch to Skoffin, but I don't think it's gonna make the consensus easier to reach
Besides, even if you don't think mitch is scum, lynching him
1) can give us info about the alignment of the persons voting him. At this stage, we can afford a mislynch, esp. if it's a VT's
2) gives our town cop one less person to investigate
3) proves you right. You like to be proven right, right?
I wonder if you have the same reason as me for thinking mitch's role claim is believable (and that's why you believe I'm not scum either). Doesn't make his actions less questionable though.
ZaBeast wrote: I wonder if you have the same reason as me for thinking mitch's role claim is believable (and that's why you believe I'm not scum either). Doesn't make his actions less questionable though.
ZaBeast wrote:I'd rather wait on pika just he case he decides to be helpful for once, but if we agree to disagree, in the spirit of saving time, I'd rather lynch him again so we don't have to go through the whole deadline thing again.
ZaBeast wrote:I'd rather wait on pika just he case he decides to be helpful for once, but if we agree to disagree, in the spirit of saving time, I'd rather lynch him again so we don't have to go through the whole deadline thing again.
Ragian wrote:Why not vote Mandy then?
ZaBeast wrote:Well, least we won't be hung up on this forever. A doc is not very helpful if he only protects himself anyways. I'm curious whether he was bluffing when he said he wouldn't protect rag during the night though.
Mandy, gonna single out on someone else tomorrow (if the game doesn't end) or are there chances we'll not be stuck in a "lynch whoever mandy wants to lynch or no-lynch" scenario again?
ZaBeast wrote:Aww, poor pika, Ragian is dead (unless that still fulfills your wincon)
Wow, short day (it's a good thing though, since I'd rather have the game end before I leave for the holidays)
Going back to skoff this time Vote Skoffin I guess we'll know soon enough if she's still "muted"
Not much more arguments than last time, except I'm still not convinced mitch is scum, so it has to be skoff, and I don't believe someone would conveniently mute her 3 turns in a row. And if the muting power is a scum one, why not mute someone more important, like a cop for instance? My take on it is she probably had a 1-shot muting ability that she used on herself on D2 and now she's stuck pretending to be mute because she can't mute anybody else.
Also, since we don't know if pika has other targets to lynch, can a person wanting to vote someone that has already one vote only state so instead of actually placing a vote, to prevent a quickhammer from pika? Except skoff, I'm perfectly fine with her being hammered Alternatively, maybe the second vote could be unofficial (underlined instead of bolded for instance)
fp'ed by pika
Since he voted skoff already it's fine having her at L-1