Conquer Club

agree with koonzt. Make the black outline like the one you have for states in the top left corner (title)
Another thing that looks strange is the sea....usually sea is darker when it becomes deeper, instead you have sarker colors near the coast line. Also the river has a different color than the rest of water on the map.

Apart for these minor things, this map can be stamped now imo
Well done Bruce
Nobodies

Good job, Bruce!

Stickied for now, if there are no other major concerns, we'll get this stamped!

Sweet!!

thenobodies80 wrote:agree with koonzt. Make the black outline like the one you have for states in the top left corner (title)
Another thing that looks strange is the sea....usually sea is darker when it becomes deeper, instead you have sarker colors near the coast line. Also the river has a different color than the rest of water on the map.

Apart for these minor things, this map can be stamped now imo
Well done Bruce
Nobodies

To answer. ... I can take it down slightly on the names. ....

As to the water. .. Rivers and seas are never the same color. .. hence the different colors. .. As for stroke.... I like that it is darker closer than lighter. .. Something different.

yeah yeah, i said it looks strange, not wrong

thenobodies80 wrote:yeah yeah, i said it looks strange, not wrong

Right I am seeing what I can do to fix the names.

thenobodies80 wrote:yeah yeah, i said it looks strange, not wrong

Considering that there are a couple of minor graphical changes, I'm going to go ahead and stamp this!!

Congrats Bruce!! You are now a mapmaker!! LOL!!

isaiah40 wrote:Considering that there are a couple of minor graphical changes, I'm going to go ahead and stamp this!!

Congrats Bruce!! You are now a mapmaker!! LOL!!

Sweet Stamp! On to XML!

isaiah40 wrote:Considering that there are a couple of minor graphical changes, I'm going to go ahead and stamp this!!

Congrats Bruce!! You are now a mapmaker!! LOL!!

Nice work Bruce!!

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:with 6 border regions to defend, the riga bonus is too hard for a +5.

without more trees, u'll need to find some other way to fix the small differential between the easiest and hardest latvian bonuses, for example by increasing riga to +6 at the same time as decreasing zemgale to +1, otherwise the riga bonus is destined to be ignored in most games.

ian.

we're not quite there yet! the above has not been addressed.

ian.

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:with 6 border regions to defend, the riga bonus is too hard for a +5.

without more trees, u'll need to find some other way to fix the small differential between the easiest and hardest latvian bonuses, for example by increasing riga to +6 at the same time as decreasing zemgale to +1, otherwise the riga bonus is destined to be ignored in most games.

ian.

we're not quite there yet! the above has not been addressed.

ian.

it has... I am not changing it. That is final.

Bruceswar wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:with 6 border regions to defend, the riga bonus is too hard for a +5.

without more trees, u'll need to find some other way to fix the small differential between the easiest and hardest latvian bonuses, for example by increasing riga to +6 at the same time as decreasing zemgale to +1, otherwise the riga bonus is destined to be ignored in most games.

ian.

we're not quite there yet! the above has not been addressed.

ian.

it has... I am not changing it. That is final.

Sorry to ask this, but why not?
Also, the glows need to be addressed.

koontz1973 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:with 6 border regions to defend, the riga bonus is too hard for a +5.

without more trees, u'll need to find some other way to fix the small differential between the easiest and hardest latvian bonuses, for example by increasing riga to +6 at the same time as decreasing zemgale to +1, otherwise the riga bonus is destined to be ignored in most games.

ian.

we're not quite there yet! the above has not been addressed.

ian.

it has... I am not changing it. That is final.

Sorry to ask this, but why not?
Also, the glows need to be addressed.

What glows? It is final because that is how I want this map to play out.

Bruceswar wrote:

koontz1973 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:

iancanton wrote:with 6 border regions to defend, the riga bonus is too hard for a +5.

without more trees, u'll need to find some other way to fix the small differential between the easiest and hardest latvian bonuses, for example by increasing riga to +6 at the same time as decreasing zemgale to +1, otherwise the riga bonus is destined to be ignored in most games.

ian.

we're not quite there yet! the above has not been addressed.

ian.

it has... I am not changing it. That is final.

Sorry to ask this, but why not?
Also, the glows need to be addressed.

What glows? It is final because that is how I want this map to play out.

OK, but ian gave a good reason to do the adjustment, so why not do it? It should only take a couple of minutes to do. The glows for the names.

Bruce, as an aside, remember to check the four new colors with it as well

Selija and Zamgale might be an issue with player 11.

Gilligan wrote:Bruce, as an aside, remember to check the four new colors with it as well

Selija and Zamgale might be an issue with player 11.

Checked and worked...

@ Koontz... Yes I am still deciding what to do with the names.

Do a watermark like you suggested to me, (I hope you were kidding) and I'll shoot ya.

Shannon Apple wrote:Do a watermark like you suggested to me, (I hope you were kidding) and I'll shoot ya.

Yes! Great idea

LIke so

How is this XML coming?

This is looking gorgeous!

t-o-m wrote:This is looking gorgeous!

Thanks TOM... XML will start soon

Gilligan wrote:How is this XML coming?

Foxglove will get going on it soon, then you can check it