WINNER
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:26 pm
GROUP H
BLACK DRAGON BEAT THE C-CREW 2-0
BLACK DRAGON BEAT THE C-CREW 2-0
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=684&t=28223
dragon dor wrote:GROUP H
BLACK DRAGOON EAT HYUFC KILLERS 2-0
Zemljanin wrote:Clive wrote:Norse wrote:However, if he doesnt join before 5th october midnight, a win will be awarded to you.
The replacment in my group looks like he's going to forfeit all the singles cos none of his current 4 games look likely to finish before then.
I have several objections:
1) It was strongly suggested that freemiums must start 4p game first, because it's so much longer than 1-1. So I took that as really the only imperative. If a freemium played 1-1 games first (otherwise than suggested), he could finish several games (even all of them) and still manage to start the firm clash a minute before deadline.
2) Even if Oct 5 midnight is a deadline for everybody, this deadline should be two days later for me, since I (being a reserve) had two days less.
3) Eight 4p games just began. At least few of them will last very long. So there is more than enough time to finish all 1-1 games before the last 4p.
I think it's unhealthy to make an atmosphere of hope to win games otherwise than by playing (sorry, English isn't my native language). I mean, if there are freemiums in some group - a premiums from that group have much bigger chance for good placement if they play as slow as they can (23 ours for every turn). It's unhealthy, isn't it?
This way a tournament could be much, much slower and longer than if some games start later than they should...
And if some freemium lose 1-1 games by decision of tournament director - he's actually punished for obeying recommendations (start 4p games first).
Please, let everybody think of it
Clive wrote:Zemljanin wrote:Clive wrote:Norse wrote:However, if he doesnt join before 5th october midnight, a win will be awarded to you.
The replacment in my group looks like he's going to forfeit all the singles cos none of his current 4 games look likely to finish before then.
I have several objections:
1) It was strongly suggested that freemiums must start 4p game first, because it's so much longer than 1-1. So I took that as really the only imperative. If a freemium played 1-1 games first (otherwise than suggested), he could finish several games (even all of them) and still manage to start the firm clash a minute before deadline.
2) Even if Oct 5 midnight is a deadline for everybody, this deadline should be two days later for me, since I (being a reserve) had two days less.
3) Eight 4p games just began. At least few of them will last very long. So there is more than enough time to finish all 1-1 games before the last 4p.
I think it's unhealthy to make an atmosphere of hope to win games otherwise than by playing (sorry, English isn't my native language). I mean, if there are freemiums in some group - a premiums from that group have much bigger chance for good placement if they play as slow as they can (23 ours for every turn). It's unhealthy, isn't it?
This way a tournament could be much, much slower and longer than if some games start later than they should...
And if some freemium lose 1-1 games by decision of tournament director - he's actually punished for obeying recommendations (start 4p games first).
Please, let everybody think of it
Well I agree that you should have an extension so you have the same amount of time to join that everyone else had. But i still don't think you have a hope in hell of managing it.
Other than that i disagree. Norse stated clearly the requirements, and you knew you shouldnt have joined if you didn't have enough free slots. Simonov is managing fine in our group.
ga7 wrote:In group C's standings a little mistake: Bad gones won at home against Za boys ultra.
Norse wrote:Standings Updated!
Nice one raceinvader for taking a point from clive...Now I'm just hoping for grobari to give him a 2-way whitewashing...
Clive wrote:Norse wrote:Standings Updated!
Nice one raceinvader for taking a point from clive...Now I'm just hoping for grobari to give him a 2-way whitewashing...
Thanks for telling them to pick on me you twat, they've all ganged on me in the firm clash so i'm going to be first elim.
Norse wrote:Besides...that wouldnt nessacarily be the best tactics for your groupies to take...youve practically already qualified...
Clive wrote:Norse wrote:Standings Updated!
Nice one raceinvader for taking a point from clive...Now I'm just hoping for grobari to give him a 2-way whitewashing...
Thanks for telling them to pick on me you twat, they've all ganged on me in the firm clash so i'm going to be first elim.
Simonov wrote:sorry i u think that but i only attacked for territory and you blocked me from taking a continent, it would be good for me if u and i took 2 lead spots in that clash...
ps norse are u afraid that clive will win and have to sleep over at your place?
Clive wrote:Zem has conquered 6 total terr's, 5 of which were from me.