Concise description:
- xxxxxxx
Specifics/Details:
- xxxxxxx
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- xxxxxxx
Moderator: Community Team
King Engineer wrote:I currently have the same rank as yours, and I lose 35 points from a Cook and gain 5 points...........I think thats fair, because Cook's normally are horrible (and demotivated) at winning games.
I mean, if the win:loss ratio was 15:30 instead of 5:35. I would had been only playing cooks and would had a much much higher rank............how much ratio do you suggest though?
h-bomb wrote:One-on-one games have a HUGE luck factor. But when I play versus a Cook I risk losing 100 rating points for a potential gain of 5 rating points? REALLY?? That makes sense? That suggests that a skilled Conquer Club player beats a poor conquer club player 20 times for every one time the poor player wins. That is absurd. The rating system should account for skill level to a degree but the current system is horrendous. You might as well not have ratings at all if you are going to accept this absurd system.
Concise description:
- xxxxxxx
Specifics/Details:
- xxxxxxx
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
- xxxxxxx
h-bomb wrote:One-on-one games have a HUGE luck factor. But when I play versus a Cook I risk losing 100 rating points for a potential gain of 5 rating points? REALLY?? That makes sense? That suggests that a skilled Conquer Club player beats a poor conquer club player 20 times for every one time the poor player wins. That is absurd. The rating system should account for skill level to a degree but the current system is horrendous. You might as well not have ratings at all if you are going to accept this absurd system.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users