Moderator: Community Team
universalchiro wrote:No no no. You've missed the point. Its not wise to approach a hypothesis or data with a preconceived belief its wrong. That's not scientific, scientist are by definition to be open minded.
universalchiro wrote:Why is there only about 4,500 years worth of sediment deposits?
"Results of this study show that the village of Quanhucun [in China] was a source of food for the cats 5,300 years ago, and the relationship between humans and cats was commensal, or advantageous for the cats," Marshall said. "Even if these cats were not yet domesticated, our evidence confirms that they lived in close proximity to farmers, and that the relationship had mutual benefits."
Cat remains rarely are found in ancient archaeological sites, and little is known about how they were domesticated. Cats were thought to have first been domesticated in ancient Egypt, where they were kept some 4,000 years ago, but more recent research suggests close relations with humans may have occurred much earlier, including the discovery of a wild cat buried with a human nearly 10,000 years ago in Cyprus.
AndyDufresne wrote:Now that universalchiro is Conqueror, does that mean he is right? Might makes right?!?!
--Andy
macbone wrote:I've probably said this before (and man, I reference him too much), but C.S. Lewis wrote that Christians need to spend more time reading scientific articles and perhaps (gasp!) less religious material.
Of course, Lewis had no problem with the theory of evolution, and found it odd that American Christians did.
universalchiro wrote:The argument is a two edge sword. It is equally argued that a little science can lead away from God, full science leads one back to God.
???universalchiro wrote:
If the Tectonic plates truly took 200+ million years
universalchiro wrote:
there would be at least one river delta that had more sedimentary deposit than 4,500 years worth. Also there would be trails of Deltas. This is a major flaw in the hypothesis that Tectonic plate movement has been traveling at the same velocity for 200 million years.
universalchiro wrote:And yes it is a Hypothesis , not fact, what the velocity of Tectonic plates was in past millennia. The evidence shows there was high velocity tectonic plate movement in the beginning that has slowed to current velocity for the last 4,500 years. Additionally the evidence supports Pangaea broke apart relatively recently, around 4,500 years ago at the time of the Genesis 7 global flood.
loluniversalchiro wrote:You are saying I'm wrong and you cite no higher authority, nor reference evidence to authenticate your reasoning & logic.
That would be true were our knowledge equal. It is not.universalchiro wrote:Your confidence is impressive Sergeant. We both know no one has perfect logic, nor perfect reasoning & discerning skills, so don't be so presumptuous that I'm wrong & you're are correct.
Try actually reading. You might learn something.universalchiro wrote:Is it impossible for me to be correct?
You think you are correct because you were taught you evolved from an Amoeba that spontaneously generated out of non-living material and now you accept this belief system and tell all non-believers they are wrong because so and so said so.
universalchiro wrote:You say I'm wrong, but its possible I'm correct.
universalchiro wrote:You say I'm wrong, but its possible I'm correct.
hotfire wrote:pangae wasn't even the first supercontinent...what broke the first one apart? another flood?
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users