Should Dukasaur be banned?

[nietzsche]

idiots who refer to mid/late teenage nudity as childporn should seriously be shot.

You want to shoot people for the observation that perhaps not every 17 year old female is fully mature yet and perhaps not ready to make adult decisions about something that will be on their internet record for the rest of their lives? You're disgusting.

You try to blur the difference between children being molested and teenagers having sex, and that's why you should be shot.

The line is blurry. Are you ready to set a clear dividing line or age between when it becomes molestation/child pornography and when it becomes consensual, adult sex?

Don't you think it would be confusing if the word used to refer to stealing an apple and robbing a bank were the same? If you use the word "bankrobbery" to refer to everything from stealing apples to pickpocketing to home break ins to bank robbery, you're a) confusing people, and b) uneccesarily blurring the lines between different sorts of crimes. Now when we're talking about underaged nudity, using "childporn" to refer to a 17 year old having sex on camera and a 9 year old being molested on camera is unneccesarily blurring the lines and confusing people.
For example, if GabonX posted a picture of a 17 year old engaging in sex it would not alter my opinion of him at all, if he on the other hand did the same with a 9 year old, I would consider him a sick sob. You're unneccesarily blurring lines when you treat these very different scenarios equally under the same name.

Omfg i find myself agreeing with Gillipig.

Good luck making sense to the puritans though.

[Army of GOD]

I kind of agree with both Mets and Gilli. I agree that there is an incredibly blurry line between a lot of shit. I know of 12 year old girls that have bigger boobs than 30 year olds. Gilli, at what age/point does it become ok to post pictures of? 12? 11? 10?

[Metsfanmax]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age? Is the idea of referring to a 6 year old and a 12 year old as both not mature enough to participate in the political arena offensive enough for you to put a bullet in my head? Or is it only sex that gives you enough of a hardon to shoot someone who disagrees with you about the status of legal minors?

[KoolBak]

This warrants another gun thread

[Gillipig]

For example, if GabonX posted a picture of a 17 year old engaging in sex it would not alter my opinion of him at all, if he on the other hand did the same with a 9 year old, I would consider him a sick sob.

How are we supposed to know the exact ages involved? Wouldn't a better policy just be not to allow GabonX to post those kind of images in the first place?

Neither of them is allowed, and that's not even what we're talking about here, just because someone does something that is not allowed doesn't mean I think they're despicable, your whole point with bringing the "childporn" thing up was to muddy his name and credibility, I suppose that's fair as long as it's true, however, before I'm willing to buy into that he's a horrendous person I want to know what these childporn accusations were about, if they were about mid/late teenage nudity then no sir, I do not think he's a despicable person. As it turns out you don't even know yourself, so you're just throwing garbage at him randomly and hoping some of it sticks. Some would call that cheap or dirty argumentation tactics, either way it's opportunistic and an attempt at steering the discussion away from a particular topic. ie "Don't listen to him, he's one of those bad people."
Or for people who only speak hockey (looking at you AoG, Serbia) Don't go after the puck, go after the player possessing the puck.

[Gillipig]

idiots who refer to mid/late teenage nudity as childporn should seriously be shot.

You want to shoot people for the observation that perhaps not every 17 year old female is fully mature yet and perhaps not ready to make adult decisions about something that will be on their internet record for the rest of their lives? You're disgusting.

You try to blur the difference between children being molested and teenagers having sex, and that's why you should be shot.

The line is blurry. Are you ready to set a clear dividing line or age between when it becomes molestation/child pornography and when it becomes consensual, adult sex?

Don't you think it would be confusing if the word used to refer to stealing an apple and robbing a bank were the same? If you use the word "bankrobbery" to refer to everything from stealing apples to pickpocketing to home break ins to bank robbery, you're a) confusing people, and b) uneccesarily blurring the lines between different sorts of crimes. Now when we're talking about underaged nudity, using "childporn" to refer to a 17 year old having sex on camera and a 9 year old being molested on camera is unneccesarily blurring the lines and confusing people.
For example, if GabonX posted a picture of a 17 year old engaging in sex it would not alter my opinion of him at all, if he on the other hand did the same with a 9 year old, I would consider him a sick sob. You're unneccesarily blurring lines when you treat these very different scenarios equally under the same name.

Omfg i find myself agreeing with Gillipig.

Good luck making sense to the puritans though.

*Sigh* this is gonna end in us having sex isn't it? Shit, I knew it all along, opposites attract, it was written on the wall, there was nothing we could do Nietzsche, we're meant for each other, the heavens have spoken, the planets align, we have to do it now or the world will face the consequences!

[tzor]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age?

No. but I think we should pull some good Tequila off the shelf, give it a good chill and have a couple of rounds of shots.

[BoganGod]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age?

No. but I think we should pull some good Tequila off the shelf, give it a good chill and have a couple of rounds of shots.

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

[Dukasaur]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age?

No. but I think we should pull some good Tequila off the shelf, give it a good chill and have a couple of rounds of shots.

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

If I was in charge there would be no voting at all, except in the Senate. We would return to the traditional values of the Empire. Plebians like you would not be permitted to speak unless spoken to by your Centurion.

[BoganGod]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age?

No. but I think we should pull some good Tequila off the shelf, give it a good chill and have a couple of rounds of shots.

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

If I was in charge there would be no voting at all, except in the Senate. We would return to the traditional values of the Empire. Plebeians like you would not be permitted to speak unless spoken to by your Centurion.

<Sadly shakes head> dino child, dino child, dino child. You are displaying once more a completely erroneous understanding of history. In particular the interactions between different stratas of society in the pre empire roman republic. One man, one vote. Though the romans had a very interesting proportional voting system. Voters voted in tribal assemblies, a law/plebiscite had to be passed by a majority of tribes to be enacted as law. This led to a lot of interesting machinations trying to find enough rural voters from a given tribal region for that tribes vote to be recorded. Plebeians could speak as much and as loudly as they wanted, not that many people with power listened too much. The only people not permitted to speak unless given permission by their centurion would be ordinary rankers within the army. Even in early roman times there were different rules and uniform codes of conduct for marines and calvary.

ps - your welcome.

[a6mzero]

Do you also think I should be shot because I agree with a minimum voting age?

No. but I think we should pull some good Tequila off the shelf, give it a good chill and have a couple of rounds of shots.

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

If I was in charge there would be no voting at all, except in the Senate. We would return to the traditional values of the Empire. Plebeians like you would not be permitted to speak unless spoken to by your Centurion.

<Sadly shakes head> dino child, dino child, dino child. You are displaying once more a completely erroneous understanding of history. In particular the interactions between different stratas of society in the pre empire roman republic. One man, one vote. Though the romans had a very interesting proportional voting system. Voters voted in tribal assemblies, a law/plebiscite had to be passed by a majority of tribes to be enacted as law. This led to a lot of interesting machinations trying to find enough rural voters from a given tribal region for that tribes vote to be recorded. Plebeians could speak as much and as loudly as they wanted, not that many people with power listened too much. The only people not permitted to speak unless given permission by their centurion would be ordinary rankers within the army. Even in early roman times there were different rules and uniform codes of conduct for marines and calvary.

ps - your welcome.

OMFG don't anyone tell BBS this was posted without a reference source.

[tzor]

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

Generally speaking, reality sets a maximum voting age. Mind you, that age was increased a while ago when they required polling places to be handicapped accessible so the old codgers could go up the ramps with their walkers, but my 89 year old father doesn't even think of voting these days.

[BoganGod]

I would love to see a maximum voting age. Let old people really have a reason to complain about how the young are ruining everything. Of course if Dukasaur was in charge reform would never happen. Staid, hide bound conservative cipher that he/she/it is.

Generally speaking, reality sets a maximum voting age. Mind you, that age was increased a while ago when they required polling places to be handicapped accessible so the old codgers could go up the ramps with their walkers, but my 89 year old father doesn't even think of voting these days.

tzor for sure think before you draw the card marked reality. Expediency rather than reality is the word your looking for. Possibly you could have used "physical limitations" or even "evolution". Just not reality.... Dukasaur would be ashamed for you