Page 2 of 3

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:07 am
by DaGip
mrswdk wrote:I'm pretty sure that's Sister Feng :lol: :lol:


Not very popular in the United States I am afraid.



However, I found her plastic surgery photos quite humorous:

Image

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 6:53 am
by mrswdk
Not exactly 'popular' in China either ;)

Oh well, she's been exported to New York so she's your problem now!

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:10 am
by tzor
jonesthecurl wrote:The best thing to come out of China is the cup of tea I just had. The tea was from Kenya by the way.


We have a whole bag of candy that the person visiting my work place from Quality Assurance brought with him. They are pretty tasty.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:32 am
by mrswdk
So what was wrong with the thread?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:20 pm
by WILLIAMS5232
mrswdk wrote:So what was wrong with the thread?


they probably were hoping you forgot about it. anyway, this part of the website is pretty much for the moderators amusement so i wouldnt expect a legitimate response. probably juat something along the lines of "blah blah blah, you hurt my feelings"

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:24 pm
by mrswdk
reserved

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:37 pm
by tzor
Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 6:49 am
by mrswdk
tzor wrote:Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?


Clearly

Image

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:17 am
by mrswdk
What's up with the silence? Is this site moderated by the CPC, and I'm going to get tragically killed in a hit and run if I keep asking where my thread has vanished to?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:48 am
by AndyDufresne
mrswdk wrote:What's up with the silence? Is this site moderated by the CPC, and I'm going to get tragically killed in a hit and run if I keep asking where my thread has vanished to?

I think it is time to turn the OT into HK.


--Andy

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:14 pm
by notyou2
Shouldn't that pic be in the Oriental Girls thread?


OWEN!!!! We need your opinion.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:56 am
by mrswdk
Why was my charity breasts thread completely deleted?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:40 pm
by DaGip
mrswdk wrote:
tzor wrote:Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?


Clearly

Image


I think those are indeed Japanese sex slaves!

And this is how they catch them!

Image

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:01 am
by notyou2
DaGip wrote:
mrswdk wrote:
tzor wrote:Has this thread gotten so popular you need reservations now?


Clearly

Image


I think those are indeed Japanese sex slaves!

And this is how they catch them!

Image


The right one is delectable.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:38 pm
by mrswdk
The bear's t-shirt says 上海话, which means something along the lines of 'Shanghai slang'.

Mods, where is the fcking breasts thread?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:45 pm
by Dukasaur
He already answered you on Sept. 7th. Do you think he should repeat the answer 20 times just because you repeat the question 20 times?

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:46 pm
by AndyDufresne
mrswdk wrote:The bear's t-shirt says 上海话, which means something along the lines of 'Shanghai slang'.

Mods, where is the fcking breasts thread?


I think it is time to start clogging up the forums and games with protest bodies and barricades!?!


--Andy

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:10 pm
by notyou2
TeeGee wrote:It is a bit of a cloudy area. The thread had been reported (more than once).
I relocated it for the admins to decide, if there is nothing in it, then they can bring it back.


In all fairness to the original poster, the question was only partially answered. Duk are your reading comprehension skills deteriorating or are you just not happy anymore? You seem to be taking everything personally.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:23 pm
by Dukasaur
notyou2 wrote:
TeeGee wrote:It is a bit of a cloudy area. The thread had been reported (more than once).
I relocated it for the admins to decide, if there is nothing in it, then they can bring it back.


In all fairness to the original poster, the question was only partially answered. Duk are your reading comprehension skills deteriorating or are you just not happy anymore? You seem to be taking everything personally.

Okay, maybe he didn't elaborate to any great degree, but all the information is there.

The thread was reported by multiple users, so TeeGee had to review it. It was very much on the border of porn vs. not-porn, so he decided not to make any groundbreaking precedents and to refer the matter to the admins. Consequently, he moved the thread to a hidden forum where the admins keep such things.

If and when the admins decide it is harmless, they will move it back. So, either (possibly) they have decided it bad enough that it should remain under wraps, or (more likely) they have been busy with other things and haven't looked at it yet.

The admins are like the Supreme Court. Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer. If something is important they usually will, but someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:41 pm
by AndyDufresne
Dukasaur wrote:someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.

IF THAT AIN'T, I DUNT KNO WAT IS ANYMOAR


--Andy

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:11 pm
by mrswdk
Dukasaur wrote:Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer.


That's the spirit.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:57 pm
by WILLIAMS5232
mrswdk wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:Just because we send them a case for disposition doesn't mean they are obligated to answer.


That's the spirit.


hmm. interesting.

Dukasaur wrote:If something is important they usually will, but someone's desire to push the envelope and broaden the amount of soft-core porn in OT doesn't really qualify as an earth-shaking emergency.


so move it without a definitive explanation, then laugh about it behind closed doors while the supreme court "gets to it". classy.

the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television. what a bunch of bitches around here.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:31 pm
by Dukasaur
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television.

I honestly can't say. I remember the case only because it racked up about three reports in four hours, which is probably something of a record for Most Reported Non-Saxitoxic Thread. I honestly don't remember the details of what was in the thread.

Nor, for that matter, do I care. I was just being nice and answering notyou2's call for clarification. I don't have a horse in this race, and certainly don't deserve this kind of abuse for trying to help:
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:what a bunch of bitches around here.

The bitches have a job to be vigilant. A lot of our members play from work or from school, and a lot of the networks they play on use third-party content rating agencies to block domains in a variety of categories, including porn. If even one third-party content rating agency was to tag us for porn, we could be blocked from tens of thousands of networks, and have hundreds or even thousands of users permanently cut off from their games.

You have to put it in perspective. CC exists to provide war games. The bullshit that goes on in the forums, while it may seem important to the zero point two percent of members who participate in it, is ultimately very irrelevant to the 99.8% of the members who come here to play war games. The activities of the 0.2% can't be allowed to jeopardize the activities of the 99.8%, and if being a little overcautious in rooting out porn is the price of defending the war games, I'm all for it.

I like titties as much as any other heterosexual guy, but if I want to see some, there are plenty of websites devoted to that pursuit. Endangering the bread-and-butter of my favourite wargaming site is not an option.

Re: Charity breast fondling thread

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:05 pm
by WILLIAMS5232
Dukasaur wrote:
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:the nudity was fuzzed out. how is that soft porn? you see worse on public television.

I honestly can't say. I remember the case only because it racked up about three reports in four hours, which is probably something of a record for Most Reported Non-Saxitoxic Thread. I honestly don't remember the details of what was in the thread.

Nor, for that matter, do I care. I was just being nice and answering notyou2's call for clarification. I don't have a horse in this race, and certainly don't deserve this kind of abuse for trying to help:
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:what a bunch of bitches around here.

The bitches have a job to be vigilant. A lot of our members play from work or from school, and a lot of the networks they play on use third-party content rating agencies to block domains in a variety of categories, including porn. If even one third-party content rating agency was to tag us for porn, we could be blocked from tens of thousands of networks, and have hundreds or even thousands of users permanently cut off from their games.

You have to put it in perspective. CC exists to provide war games. The bullshit that goes on in the forums, while it may seem important to the zero point two percent of members who participate in it, is ultimately very irrelevant to the 99.8% of the members who come here to play war games. The activities of the 0.2% can't be allowed to jeopardize the activities of the 99.8%, and if being a little overcautious in rooting out porn is the price of defending the war games, I'm all for it.

I like titties as much as any other heterosexual guy, but if I want to see some, there are plenty of websites devoted to that pursuit. Endangering the bread-and-butter of my favourite wargaming site is not an option.


ok, but it wasn't porn. it was a news article.
there was no nudity. i remember it.
i, like you, don't have a dog in the fight. nor do i care about the outcome of this. but i think some people are lame here. and it's that lameness that bugs me to no end. it would appear to me that there are about 3 members here that don't like the poster. that's a guess. and those three members are buddies with someone with the ability to move threads to hidden areas that "wait" for approval. i think that's more childish than putting a thread with fuzzed out nudity in the forums. i guess i could be wrong. but i don't think i am. mainly because i remember the picture in question. and there was nothing offensive unless you don't like heavily pixelated pictures.