Conquer Club

Re: WWI: Gallipoli [9.9.15] V39 (p22) [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: WWI: Gallipoli [9.9.15] V39 (p22) [Quenched]

Postby cairnswk on Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:41 pm

WWI - Gallipoli

Image ImageImage Image Image

Draft Stamped 31.7.2009
Gameplay Stamped 13.7.2013 (4yrs - phew!)
Graphics Stamped 7.9.2013
XML STamped 21.9.2013
Beta Stamped 23.11.13


Map Name: WW1 - Gallipoli
Mapmaker: cairnswk
Number of Territories: 100
Special Features:Starting Neutrals, ranged attacks, losing condition, autodeploy, one-way borders, impassables
Fonts: Vagabond, Bookman Oldstyle
Software:Fireworks CS3 (image), Coreldraw X4 (text and legend)
What Makes This Map Worthy of Being Made:
1. It is a classic battle that deserves a place on this site :)
2. The 100th anniversary of Gallipoli will occur in 2015.
3. Descriptions of any unique features or areas.
Battleships, Forts, Sea Mines, Landing Craft, Land Batteries...
Gallipoli was a big milestone in the Australian and New Zealand psyche for standing alongside each other in mateship and battle. It was also a huge disaster, but that didn't reduce the pride of Nationhoods.
The design features the outline of the War Memorial in Canberra atop the legend piece. Much of the Gallipoli collection is held in the Canberra War Memorial and I have viewed this fantastic collection of pieces. Suitable geographic and ship artwork will feature where necessary.

Map size:
Small - 650W x 600H
Large - 780W x 719H (1.2% larger)

Version 39
Small
Image

Large
Click image to enlarge.
image


show: Starting positions - Version 38


show: V38 with 88s


show: CB version 37



show: Original Images


XML update 8 Aug 2015
download/file.php?mode=view&id=1961

iancanton wrote:...
i especially recommend that we reduce the first-turn advantage by increasing the neutrals on 12 of the landing beaches from n3 to n4 and on l06 from n6 to n7, which stops so many of the beaches from being overrun before player two has even had a turn.
ian. :)


Gameplay
Something for everyone in this one!
See special features above.

    1. Total Territories
    100 - 40 starts and 60 neutrals

    2. The number of continents.
    There are no actual continents for this map. Land positions and landing ships (not battleships) autodeploy to simulate the invasion fleet.

    Losing Condition: Players failing to hold any land position will be eliminated

    3. Starting Territories (40)

      8 Battleships - start with 18 (no autodeplay) and can bombard any marked target as per the legend. They cannot be bombared from shore. They can be added to at the beginning of your turn. Use them wisely!
      13 Invasion Craft - start with 6
      3 Minesweepers - start with 6
      8 Turkish terrs (start 6) on the east side of the Dardanelles (includes 1 land battery - represents the force that had to come from the Capital Constantinople after the invasion started).
      8 Turkish terrs (start 6) on the western peninsula (includes 1 forts and 2 land batteries)

    Each player starts with at least 1 battleship (BS).
    That leaves 32 starting positions (SP) to be distributed by the luck of the drop on starting positions (as marked), and 32 is a golden number.
      2P = 3BS + 10SP + 64N
      3P = 3BS + 10SP + 64N
      4P = 2BS + 8SP + 60N
      5P = 1BS + 6SP + 65N
      6P = 1BS + 5SP + 64N
      7P = 1BS + 4SP + 65N
      8P = 1BS + 4SP + 60N
Attachments
09Gallipoli.xml
(44.61 KiB) Downloaded 1895 times
Last edited by cairnswk on Sat Aug 08, 2015 3:49 am, edited 109 times in total.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby Incandenza on Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:53 pm

Holy crap, a late xmas present!
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby samuelc812 on Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:47 pm

Great Map :)
Ok i have a few Suggestions, about Graphics, not much on Gameplay yet but will come back later on ;)

  1. The Army Circles that indicate the forting: of land attack and sea bombard are a little hard to see the symbol attached, i spent a few minutes trying to find just that, maybe making them darker will make it better...
  2. I am wondering whether it would be better to make the territory titles bold so they are clearer to read...
  3. I think maytbe the Purple behind the title may grow on me but at the moment it isn't that appealing...
  4. Love the Poppies what a great touch :)
  5. How many Starting Territories does each player get at the start of a game?
  6. How do players get to the Battleships in the game, they seem isolated, i am probably missing something ;)

Lest We Forget...
Great Work So Far :)
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby cairnswk on Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:59 pm

Incandenza wrote:Holy crap, a late xmas present!

Feast has arrived :)

samuelc812 wrote:Great Map :)
Ok i have a few Suggestions, about Graphics, not much on Gameplay yet but will come back later on ;)

  1. The Army Circles that indicate the forting: of land attack and sea bombard are a little hard to see the symbol attached, i spent a few minutes trying to find just that, maybe making them darker will make it better...
  2. I am wondering whether it would be better to make the territory titles bold so they are clearer to read...
  3. I think maytbe the Purple behind the title may grow on me but at the moment it isn't that appealing...
  4. Love the Poppies what a great touch :)
  5. How many Starting Territories does each player get at the start of a game?
  6. How do players get to the Battleships in the game, they seem isolated, i am probably missing something ;)

Lest We Forget...
Great Work So Far :)

1. Forts.... i will brick them up properly so that they stand out like real forts.
2. i will see about bolding later the tert names
3. i luv the purple
4. Gotta have the poppies
5. the game will be setup with 16 start terts on each side...so that an 8 player game gets 4 terts each. This game would be best for doubles etc. but the xml doesn't allow that to be coded (yet)
6. Yeh, gotta work on the battleships...they start with a high number so that they can bombard if necessary...and will auto reduce eventually...this is in line with how the battleships were in the real battle....they were withdrawn eventually because there was too much damage being done from u-boats. They will cease to be effective after X rounds.
But i am also considering linking them to shore landing positions so that that player may get some troops ashore...yes i'll do that.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby Qwert on Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:20 pm

Ok,now i hope that you have same standards,not double standards,
When i say that in WWI Ottoman Empire you make big mistake with name Gelibolu, and that you need to change to proper english translation,you refuse and tell me that these is proper name for GAllipoli?!
Gallipoli need to be same names in bouth maps.
Now here i see something what im tell you that is correct name.
Little explanation will be good for me,because im a little confused.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9190
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby cairnswk on Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:27 pm

qwert wrote:Ok,now i hope that you have same standards,not double standards,
When i say that in WWI Ottoman Empire you make big mistake with name Gelibolu, and that you need to change to proper english translation,you refuse and tell me that these is proper name for GAllipoli?!
Gallipoli need to be same names in bouth maps.
Now here i see something what im tell you that is correct name.
Little explanation will be good for me,because im a little confused.


Qwert, thanks for your comments. :)
this is the english version of this campaign. Gallipoli is a town that is not even on this map but given a name sake for the territory.
I know it is Gelibolu on the Ottoman map, and that was done to appease the turkish player who had the decency to comment and request on that map.
I want this map to be in all english.
this is not double standards, but simply an alternative way of naming. :)
So don't be confused...it is good. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby Qwert on Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:58 pm

Qwert, thanks for your comments.
this is the english version of this campaign. Gallipoli is a town that is not even on this map but given a name sake for the territory.
I know it is Gelibolu on the Ottoman map, and that was done to appease the turkish player who had the decency to comment and request on that map.
I want this map to be in all english.
this is not double standards, but simply an alternative way of naming.
So don't be confused...it is good.

No its not good,how many time these so call "turkish player"post in these topic?
Everybody know for famous Gallipoli battle,even i know for that, if someon tell me"do you heard for famous Gelibolu Battle?" i will definitly say that im not heard for such battle(and english is not mine language). I know that these turkish player wants to all names in WWI Ottoman map be turkish not english,well he even want to Constantinople be change with Istanbul. He have decency to comment and request to you change Gallipolli ,to be Gelibolu.
You want to be pleased to one person who posted 2-3 times in map foundry,and only because hes wishes is that these name must be in turkis,and all other names is in english translation.
Ofcourse mine oppinion,many time is ignored,and sometime is apply,only after long discusions. I will newer understand these, but these is yours map,and you can do what you want,i can not force you to do right thing,these is only small opservation, who sometime can be helpful,and some time can be ignored(well many time).
Good luck with these map, the start is good with More appropriate Famous name. I just hope that some other turkish player will not request that you change these name to Gelibolu,because after all these whas hes victory.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Major Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 9190
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby cairnswk on Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:10 pm

qwert wrote:...
No its not good,how many time these so call "turkish player"post in these topic?
Everybody know for famous Gallipoli battle,even i know for that, if someon tell me"do you heard for famous Gelibolu Battle?" i will definitly say that im not heard for such battle(and english is not mine language). I know that these turkish player wants to all names in WWI Ottoman map be turkish not english,well he even want to Constantinople be change with Istanbul. He have decency to comment and request to you change Gallipolli ,to be Gelibolu.
You want to be pleased to one person who posted 2-3 times in map foundry,and only because hes wishes is that these name must be in turkis,and all other names is in english translation.
Ofcourse mine oppinion,many time is ignored,and sometime is apply,only after long discusions. I will newer understand these, but these is yours map,and you can do what you want,i can not force you to do right thing,these is only small opservation, who sometime can be helpful,and some time can be ignored(well many time).
Good luck with these map, the start is good with More appropriate Famous name. I just hope that some other turkish player will not request that you change these name to Gelibolu,because after all these whas hes victory.


I would hope that since we're an international community it would be acceptable to cater for someone who only posts two or three times on a map and makes such a request. I don't have any issue with it. At least i can say that i listen and give4 the foundry 98% of what is asked. You appear to be the one who has an issue with this unfortunately. You have made your point and since it is only early days for this map, why don't you wait and see what happens. I might yet change everything to Yiddish, then we'd all be up the creek :lol: :lol:
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby samuelc812 on Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:22 pm

Are there going to be set bonuses for different regions like any other map, or is this going to be just auto-deploys etc. ?
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby cairnswk on Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:03 pm

samuelc812 wrote:Are there going to be set bonuses for different regions like any other map, or is this going to be just auto-deploys etc. ?

Samual...please give me the pleasure of reading the posting topic at the head of this thread. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V1

Postby samuelc812 on Mon Dec 29, 2008 8:36 pm

:lol: Sorry Cairns :oops:
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V2

Postby cairnswk on Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:18 pm

Version 2.

1. Road along the Peninsula in place - this will possibly allow quick movement between villages
2. All terts except one have names
3. re-designed the right legend to allow fitting in of Chanak Kale - this is afterall known in Turkey as the Battle of Chanak Kale not Gallipoli.

Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V2 - Alterations

Postby cairnswk on Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:31 pm

Regarding the Battleships. I'm not sure how these can be changed. From my research, it appears they were used for bombarding the beaches and villages that held troops, and weren't used for landing troops as part of the invasion.
I will continue to look and research this fact however.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V2 - Alterations

Postby MrBenn on Tue Dec 30, 2008 7:40 pm

There's no mistaking this as anything other than a Cairns map ;-)

I'm afraid that the following is more a collection of random thoughts than coherent feedback, but here we go:

1. The attack lines from the boats gives the illusion of 1-way arrows, although I am assuming that they are 2-way attacks...

2. There is nothing on the legend to indicate how the battleships can be conquered/bombarded - and they are the only starting positions that can directly inflict damage on an opponent... wait, I've just seen the 3 orange 9s on land, and the red 3 bordering the green 9... Are these coloured to be starting positions? I'm assuming the grey 3s are all neutrals? It seems to me that if you get a battleship from the drop, you may as well spend all your armies bombarding wherever you can to avoid losing them unnecessarily through decay - this is what sometimes happens on dustbowl... In fact, the most sensible starting move is to attack and advance from all of your ships. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not sure...

3. Is there any special significance (gameplay-wise) of the Turisk Hexagons?

4. With autodeploy on all the land territories, the 9s will become 10s, whereas the boats will change from 9s to 7s.... Are you planning on keeping a regular territory bonus (as +1 for every 3 terrs over 12), or abolishing it? I've sometimes thought about some kind of autodeploy-only map...

That's it for now ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
Lieutenant MrBenn
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V2 - Alterations

Postby cairnswk on Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:27 pm

MrBenn wrote:There's no mistaking this as anything other than a Cairns map ;-)

I'm afraid that the following is more a collection of random thoughts than coherent feedback, but here we go:

1. The attack lines from the boats gives the illusion of 1-way arrows, although I am assuming that they are 2-way attacks...

2. There is nothing on the legend to indicate how the battleships can be conquered/bombarded - and they are the only starting positions that can directly inflict damage on an opponent... wait, I've just seen the 3 orange 9s on land, and the red 3 bordering the green 9... Are these coloured to be starting positions? I'm assuming the grey 3s are all neutrals? It seems to me that if you get a battleship from the drop, you may as well spend all your armies bombarding wherever you can to avoid losing them unnecessarily through decay - this is what sometimes happens on dustbowl... In fact, the most sensible starting move is to attack and advance from all of your ships. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I'm not sure...

3. Is there any special significance (gameplay-wise) of the Turisk Hexagons?

4. With autodeploy on all the land territories, the 9s will become 10s, whereas the boats will change from 9s to 7s.... Are you planning on keeping a regular territory bonus (as +1 for every 3 terrs over 12), or abolishing it? I've sometimes thought about some kind of autodeploy-only map...

That's it for now ;-)


Thanks for the comments Mr Benn. :)
You've jumped in as I'm in the process of still designing.
1. there will be 8 battleships (one for each player) that will be able to bombard turkish postiions marked with the red target marker. The battleship will start off with high numbers (still to be determined) and will be an auto-reducing by -2 each round so that if a player doesn't use all the shells to bombard, then their bad luck. Eventually these will fizzle out and become redundant in the game, just like the battelships were withdrawn from the real battle.
2. there will be 4 craft that can attack the mine fields in the Dardenalles and 12 other landing craft so that some players will get two landing craft and others get one of each. The landing craft will be able to be bombarded from the beach but not attacked. The Minesweepers will be able to be bombarded from the turkish fortresses along the Dardenelles.
3. no particular relevance to the turkish hexagons and may yet change to normal circles - for now they exist for differentiation.
4. Not yet thought about regular territory bonus apart from the fact that every land tert conquered has a +1 bonus...that too can change depending on the feedback for gameplay.

But for now i am working on the Queen Elizabeth class battleship to put into effect...so watch this space...version 3 will reveal more.

Scale model used - time to draw - 1/2 hour

Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V3

Postby cairnswk on Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:58 pm

Version 3.

1. Battleships added - suggested gameplay prompt
2. 16 starting terts sorted on Allies side - Turksih side still to do.
3. changed the landing routes and will probably need to change them again.
4. as map grows and changes, so does the legend.

Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V3(P2) - Battleships added

Postby The Neon Peon on Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:00 am

How did I miss this map? It is amazing. Trying to figure out most of it. But
1. Huge number of territories,
2. Complex Gameplay
That is all you need. This map is done, right there.

Beautiful graphics. Nice new style.

Forts are kind of hard to see.
The Turkish Crossing points could use some work
What is the line down the center of the map?

I like that you have made the starting points uneven. Makes a whole new strategy depending on the drop, and not a bad thing. Good to add even more factors to how you play.

You are way too good at this stuff. Your versions 3 (for the latest few maps) are good enough to be sent to the main foundry, in my opinion. Keep up the good work.
User avatar
Lieutenant The Neon Peon
 
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V4

Postby cairnswk on Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am

The Neon Peon wrote:How did I miss this map? It is amazing. Trying to figure out most of it. But
1. Huge number of territories,
2. Complex Gameplay
That is all you need. This map is done, right there.

Beautiful graphics. Nice new style.

Forts are kind of hard to see.
The Turkish Crossing points could use some work
What is the line down the center of the map?

I like that you have made the starting points uneven. Makes a whole new strategy depending on the drop, and not a bad thing. Good to add even more factors to how you play.

You are way too good at this stuff. Your versions 3 (for the latest few maps) are good enough to be sent to the main foundry, in my opinion. Keep up the good work.


Everything noted Neon....

Below is Version 4.
1. Villages added to roads with gameplay instruction
2. Forts enhanced
3. Tekke Burnu area sorted


To do:
1. Sort turkish start points
2. attack lines for minesweepers.
3. the contour lines, borders, and the painted land.
4. Turkish crossing points.

Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V4(P2) - Battleships & Villages added

Postby cairnswk on Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

Comments anyone?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V4(P2) - Battleships & Villages added

Postby samuelc812 on Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:43 pm

Are the purple glows around Achi Baba and Chunuk Bair, going to have black strokes like the rest of them? or are they something different?

The "Forts: Land Attack or sea bombard" are a lot better :)
User avatar
Captain samuelc812
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:56 am

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V4(P2) - Battleships & Villages added

Postby cairnswk on Wed Dec 31, 2008 7:03 pm

samuelc812 wrote:Are the purple glows around Achi Baba and Chunuk Bair, going to have black strokes like the rest of them? or are they something different?

The "Forts: Land Attack or sea bombard" are a lot better :)


Samuel :)
1. Yes, they will be inproved those ridge indicators are simply there for the moment because they are easy to grab in a separate layer from the map and don't interfere with the black lines.
2. yes, i quite like the forts also

I'll be putting up another version later today.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V5

Postby cairnswk on Thu Jan 01, 2009 3:29 pm

Version 5.

1. Beaches added - other terrain to be additioned later.
2. Landing craft changed
3. left legend changed slightly
4. turkish positions fixed (subject to gameplay change)
5. impassable lines fixed

Image
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V5(P2) - Small Changes

Postby the.killing.44 on Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:01 pm

If you're really gonna make the beaches mean something, they seem very overshadowed by some of the army shadows. Of course, you have the lines so no biggie, unless you have some thing in mind ;)
User avatar
Captain the.killing.44
 
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V5(P2) - Small Changes

Postby The Neon Peon on Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:02 pm

I disagree with the suggested gameplay. I would think it is break out, kill the people next to you, then bombard. If you break out and start off going to land, I don't think you are going to be that successful when others come at you from behind.
User avatar
Lieutenant The Neon Peon
 
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: WWI - Gallipoli V5(P2) - Small Changes

Postby cairnswk on Fri Jan 02, 2009 4:32 am

the.killing.44 wrote:If you're really gonna make the beaches mean something, they seem very overshadowed by some of the army shadows. Of course, you have the lines so no biggie, unless you have some thing in mind ;)


Sorry .44, i don't understand what you're on about here.
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

Next

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron