Page 5 of 14
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:21 pm
by naxus
naxus wrote:Vote Cout(Mayor)
Com9(4)-com9, haggis, edoc, tails
Vote Count(Lynch 1)
Com9(1)-Victor
Victor(3)-Haggis, Aage, stefunny
Deadline Set for Saturday at Midnight Standard Mountain time. When the Deadline Hits top three people(who have at least one vote) will be killed. If noone has any votes then three no lynches. I suggest you either end the day or quick lynch to avoid a mishap....
Also mass prod coming to everyone
8 alive, 5 to lynch
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:06 am
by Commander9
The worst thing here is that there's no real substance to find anyone lynching at the moment. Unless I'm missing something?
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:02 am
by TA1LGUNN3R
Commander9 wrote:aage wrote:XD
Sorry, but I seriously lol'd.

Perhaps because you two are aligned?

And it almost worked too?
Or perhaps I'm just being paranoid?

And making no sense...

and just being Herk

Grasping much? And too many smilies:
vote Commander-Tails
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:57 am
by aage
I'll mayor-vote commander to get this moving a bit.
This makes him the mayor right?
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:53 am
by Haggis_McMutton
I still think the Sully is our best bet. It's not conclusive or anything but I don't see anything better ...
Also, what do you guys think about the 3 kills thing. Is that good? Should we just do 1 lynch and then vote no lynch?
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:43 am
by Victor Sullivan
Haggis_McMutton wrote:I still think the Sully is our best bet. It's not conclusive or anything but I don't see anything better ...
Hey! I told you I'm the CPR doc! Wtf, man???
unvote vote Haggis for trying to lynch a doc/town SK (kinda).
-Uncle Sully
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:57 am
by Haggis_McMutton
Victor Sullivan wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:I still think the Sully is our best bet. It's not conclusive or anything but I don't see anything better ...
Hey! I told you I'm the CPR doc! Wtf, man???
unvote vote Haggis for trying to lynch a doc/town SK (kinda).
-Uncle Sully
Hehehe, are you trying to intentionally sound like herk?
I told you I'm town man, what you voting me for?
Maybe cause I don't buy it.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:11 pm
by Victor Sullivan
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:I still think the Sully is our best bet. It's not conclusive or anything but I don't see anything better ...
Hey! I told you I'm the CPR doc! Wtf, man???
unvote vote Haggis for trying to lynch a doc/town SK (kinda).
-Uncle Sully
Hehehe, are you trying to intentionally sound like herk?
I told you I'm town man, what you voting me for?
Maybe cause I don't buy it.
But it's on sale!! Buy one role claim get the second one half off!!!
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:07 pm
by Commander9
Haggis_McMutton wrote:I still think the Sully is our best bet. It's not conclusive or anything but I don't see anything better ...
Also, what do you guys think about the 3 kills thing. Is that good? Should we just do 1 lynch and then vote no lynch?
IMO, 1 lynch is enough.
aage wrote:I'll mayor-vote commander to get this moving a bit.
This makes him the mayor right?
I think it's elect, Aage. Stop skimming

Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:29 pm
by Haggis_McMutton
Well, if we want only 1 kill we'd better get to it and end this day before the deadline.
Otherwise the scum will find some weak reason or another to put 1 vote on some townies and we'll prolly have about 2 dead townies by day's end.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:42 pm
by Commander9
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, if we want only 1 kill we'd better get to it and end this day before the deadline.
Otherwise the scum will find some weak reason or another to put 1 vote on some townies and we'll prolly have about 2 dead townies by day's end.
We still have 3 days, so there's no need to lynch someone extremely fast, but I do agree that we have to find someone suitable before the deadline runes out.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:46 pm
by Haggis_McMutton
Commander9 wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, if we want only 1 kill we'd better get to it and end this day before the deadline.
Otherwise the scum will find some weak reason or another to put 1 vote on some townies and we'll prolly have about 2 dead townies by day's end.
We still have 3 days, so there's no need to lynch someone extremely fast, but I do agree that we have to find someone suitable before the deadline runes out.
Yeah, but we have to lynch someone and reach no lynch twice in order to have only 1 kill.
So we are kind of pressed for time.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:50 pm
by Commander9
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Yeah, but we have to lynch someone and reach no lynch twice in order to have only 1 kill.
So we are kind of pressed for time.
From my understanding, as long as there are no other votes, no one else gets lynched, so after our 1st lynch we'd be good. If not, we can quickly do two no-lynches and then decide on the final one Thursday/Friday.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:27 pm
by naxus
Vote count(lynch 1)
Com9(1)-Tails
Haggis(1)-Victor
Victor(3)-Haggis, aage, stefunny85
8 alive, 5 to lynch
The town deliberated and much lollygagging was had. But at the end of the meeting, Commander9 was elected Mayor. His votes are now worth two.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:50 pm
by Commander9
Okay, thanks for the trust. Now die all
Now seriously - there were no strong cases so far with the strongest one being against Victor (but I don't think it's a strong enough case yet).
We haven't seen anything from both Vio and Stefunny for a while now, so perhaps either prod, replace or lynch (preferably not the last one). From Stefunny's post I didn't get any bad vibes, but hard to judge with so little. Vio has only posted once and saying that she hasn't received her role, so I'd vote for a replacement here.
Tails has posted much more than these two, but nothing too encouraging or valuable. Scummaring perhaps?
Aage, Haggis and Edoc all seem to be contributing and I haven't seen anything scummy yet.
Thoughts?
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:59 pm
by Commander9
I've re-read the recruiting thread for this game where Victor said he doesn't know much about the game, but he'll try. Then he does claim a role of Uncle and by the looks of it gets everything right. For now, I do believe what he says to be, so we'll have to look somewhere else.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:56 pm
by aage
aage wrote:I think I'll [b]unvote[/b to see some more discussion.
Gods. Sorry you missed this, but I (tried to) unvote(d).
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:46 pm
by edocsil
Commander9 wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:Yeah, but we have to lynch someone and reach no lynch twice in order to have only 1 kill.
So we are kind of pressed for time.
From my understanding, as long as there are no other votes, no one else gets lynched, so after our 1st lynch we'd be good. If not, we can quickly do two no-lynches and then decide on the final one Thursday/Friday.
Forgot that this was lights out. In that case I think we should lynch vic to clear the votes and then not vote anyone else, and hope the night passes quietly.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:50 pm
by safariguy5
Confirm. Not sure who I'm replacing though.
CPR Doc...a relatively uncommon role. Given this is the west, medicine probably hasn't progressed that far.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:50 pm
by naxus
Vote count(lynch 1)-Fixed
Com9(1)-Tails
Haggis(1)-Victor
Victor(2)-Haggis, stefunny85
8 alive, 5 to lynch
Safariguy5 has replaced violet and i'm looking for a replacement for stefunny. If theres a spike in activity the deadline may be extended but chances are slim of said extension
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:55 pm
by Commander9
Hmm, good spot Safari, although now I am a bit inclined in believing him due that's it's not that easy to fake a good claim (then again, Sully is one of the most experienced around).
@ Edoc - I don't think we should hurry and get into paranoia yet - there's still time to talk this out and analyze.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:59 pm
by safariguy5
It's a damn ballsy wifom sort of claim if that's what we're basing on lynching or not. On the other hand,with 8 people, it's only going to be a couple of days before it becomes a really powerful role. If he targets scum, they're dead, and the odds that he targets one of say 2-3 remaining townies correctly would be much higher than say 4-5. I hesitate to lynch right away considering the mechanics.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:05 pm
by Commander9
safariguy5 wrote:It's a damn ballsy wifom sort of claim if that's what we're basing on lynching or not. On the other hand,with 8 people, it's only going to be a couple of days before it becomes a really powerful role. If he targets scum, they're dead, and the odds that he targets one of say 2-3 remaining townies correctly would be much higher than say 4-5. I hesitate to lynch right away considering the mechanics.
Not necessarily, IMO. If the player is good, he could be used as a vig and could be highly useful as long as he doesn't go on a killing spree - he could be the only killing role the town has. However, the part where you've pointed out that CPR doctor shouldn't have been around back then is a very good point. Victor, any responses to this?
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:15 pm
by edocsil
Yup, sticking to my guns on this one. There is no way to prove or disprove if he is telling the truth, and with so few nights there is absolutely no point in wasting an investigation on him. He also has been around long enough to think this kind of claim through if he is scum.
Whatever our course of action however, we cannot just sit around, anyone with a vote on them is likely to get axed, and that many deaths could possibly endgame us.
Re: Red Dead Redemption Game Thread-Day 1
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:08 am
by naxus
Stefunny has been replaced by jace22