Conquer Club

Asymmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Asymmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.

Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.

What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.

Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...

Gillipig wrote:

Asymmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Asymmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.

Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.

What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.

Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...

And you were the one was being an idiot.

Symmetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Asymmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Asymmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both end of the spectrum.

Fascists and Communists? I'm not sure that's a strong base, but perhaps I'm wrong.

What a stupid comment. Communists are not in the least interested in Libertarian policies and facists are pro an aggressive military. The two groups you mentioned are among the groups least likely to support his policies. You're as stupid and misinformed as the people calling Obama a communist, shame on you.

Hey, Scotty was the one claiming Paul's support came from both ends of the spectrum...

And you were the one was being an idiot.

Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

Gillipig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.

Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.

Symmetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.

Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.

So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.

Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.

Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.

So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.

Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.

You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Americantry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.

Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.

So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.

Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.

You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.

Gillipig wrote:

Americantry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Fine, what do you consider to be the ends of the political spectrum?

In this context obviously hard left Democrats and hard right Republicans. Neither of which are Facists or Communists.

Edit: If you were talking about Swedish politics your statement would make more sense, the communists and facists are pretty big over here, both these views are somewhat represented in our politics. The "left party" which has about 7 percent of the votes has been led by numerous self described communists and the Swedish Democrats used to be a neonazi party where they would meet in nazi uniforms. They have about 9 percent now but have cleaned up their politics a bit. In the US you have two parties that completely dominate your politics and neither of them are even remotely close to communism or facism.

So the spectrum encompasses communists and fascists. But only in Sweden. Ok, I disagree.

Edit: I don't really need to type this, as I have the last post, but hey, apparently you can put the bulk of your irrelevant argument here. This is fun.

You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.

American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.

Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.

Wrongetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Americantry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.

American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.

Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.

I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,

I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.

Gillipig wrote:

Wrongetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Americantry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.

American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.

Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.

I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,

I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.

Well you were wrong on both accounts.
Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.

Symmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.

....perhaps I'm wrong.

Phatscotty wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.

....perhaps I'm wrong.

Indeed

Symmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:That's what I mean...Rand Paul get support from both Republicans and Democrats, right and left.

....perhaps I'm wrong.

Indeed

Of all the posters, I would have thought you'd outright deny me. Thanks for saying that I am perhaps right.

Symmetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Wrongetry wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

Americantry wrote:

Sillypig wrote:You're such a fruitcake, you have a two party system where neither party is communist nor facist, we have a different system where there are parties that could be called facist and communist.

Were you under the impression that I was American? You're lot's of fun Gilli, but you've been a bit silly here.

American or British I can't tell the difference, you write in the same manner and seem to have similar values, your culture is virtually identical and the only way to tell you apart is through your accents. You'd like to think there's so much difference but to an outsider there really isn't.

Having said that, we were speaking about american politics weren't we? I'm pretty sure PS wasn't talking about British politics when he talked about Rand Paul's appeal in the political spectrum.

I think the issue of American vs British English is mostly with u,

I thought I was commenting on the spectrum of politics.

Well you were wrong on both accounts.
Your cultures are eerily similar and you weren't commenting on the spectrum of politics in general, you were commenting on the spectrums of american politics.

Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.

It was a shock to me.

Gillipig wrote:

Symmetry wrote:
Was I? Thank you for pointing that out to me. I hadn't realised that I was being so eerie. Thanks for telling me that although I was commenting on the spectrum of political thought, that I actually wasn't.

It was a shock to me.

You don't fool me mister, I don't think you are capable of learning anything at this point, your mind has already been set.

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

Symmetry wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

Only if we're talking about Sweden though, apparently.

BigBallinStalin wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

Only if we're talking about Sweden though, apparently.

Of course! Communists and fascists do not exist in the United States nor Canada.

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

Gillipig wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

I DON'T AGREE!!!

Nola_Lifer wrote:

Gillipig wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Fascism and Communism are the two poles of the simple left v right political spectrum.


SYM WINS!!!

I DON'T AGREE!!!

Gillipig admit it he won. He trolled another thread and completely derailed it. CLAIM HIM AS WINNER!