Conquer Club

heavycola wrote:

btownmeggy wrote:

btownmeggy wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.

This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.

Even if he his joking, it's a good one.

Ta-da!

|
|
V

It's certainly worthy. not sure about the ellpisis though...

I was just really captivated by the disease references, and wanted to keep it concise.

So while we're privatizing healthcare, should we also privatize the police? What about the Fire Department? Surely the rich deserve better protection from criminals than the poor?

Why not? They already have better protection from the police.[/quote]

Na-na-na...

My police is better than yours.

browng-08 wrote:

Frigidus wrote:

Norse wrote:No.

It was Robin of Loxley.

Yes. Jesus.

Jesus Hood and the Merry Apostols

[lyrical waxing]Ta da, da da da da - whoo!

I stela form the rich and give to the needy
(he takes a wee percentage) but I'm not greedy!
I rescue pretty damsels, man I'm good!
(what a guy, hahaha!
Monsieur Hood!)[/lyrical waxing]

Robbby hoodiddle and da Little J-man

Norse wrote:Robbby hoodiddle and da Little J-man

In da hood!

Communism is a political view, although nearly everyone here agrees with you opinion you may wish to view the political compass graph where nearly everyone on this site is communist, take the test your probably classed as communist. It as an opinion has it's flaws but so does capitalism. It in theory is a great idea such as many people say about god but in practice it is not workable. Just because you disagree doesn't mean that other people are defensive of their opinion, my great grandmother was a member of the communist party, the arguments she gave are quite good for the cause, as silly as it may sound it is a belief so it should be respected, so DM before you call an idea "retarded" again think, can someone call the alternative the same.

Mustard is pretending to be an ignorant school kid, it is his Unit_2 impression.

FYI, communism is the top left, what you are looking at is anarchy / socialism.

ignotus wrote:Na-na-na...

My police is better than yours.

Ours are busy beating up native people and tasering immigrants to death to do their job.

max is gr8 wrote:Communism is a political view, although nearly everyone here agrees with you opinion you may wish to view the political compass graph where nearly everyone on this site is communist, take the test your probably classed as communist. It as an opinion has it's flaws but so does capitalism. It in theory is a great idea such as many people say about god but in practice it is not workable. Just because you disagree doesn't mean that other people are defensive of their opinion, my great grandmother was a member of the communist party, the arguments she gave are quite good for the cause, as silly as it may sound it is a belief so it should be respected, so DM before you call an idea "retarded" again think, can someone call the alternative the same.

If that test says that I am a communist then it is a rubbish test and makes no sense and must have been made by some retarded Leninist propaganda maker to make us all think that communism is cool when in fact it is worse than dog-poo mixed with the phlegm that TB sufferers cough up moments before their inevitable death.

I don't care if your grandmother was a communist because she isnt' here now. If communism worked then she would be. Or you would be able to explain why communism isn't a sin that is evil and sinful and crap.

If communism is so cool then why aren't people here saying that it's awesome. Ron Paul is awesome and lots of people get up and talk about him. So communism, must be really retarded if people aren't talking about it.

If you think it's so cool then you'd be able to explain why it's not theft.

But you can't





That makes it retarded. I still win.

Lolz, if i waz a litle bit more clevererer, i wuld be like DancingMouseTurds freind.

Communism is not stupid DM the part that is stupid is the extreme of communism, Communists believe that companies are there to serve people not the shareholders, Neo-liberalists believe the opposite, communism is only stupid at the very extreme side of things, I don't support that part I support the gentler side of it, which should be used

I don't care if your grandmother was a communist because she isnt' here now.

Actually she is, alive and well and a member of the communist party

There is no good communism and you have not proved that any communism is good at all, it is all stupid because it takes away money that people have earned and gives it to fat and lazy and stupid people which is theft. Theft is a sin so communism is retarded and an abomination against god. I don't care if old ladies think communism is good because they are past it and their opinions don't count any more so who cares. This thread has had lots of good arguments for communism being stupid and rubbish and retarded and a SIN, but it has had none for communism being good. Because these arguments don't exist.

Go back and re-read if you don't believe me.

Or prove that communism isn't just a way of making greedy retarded people money. Because that is what it is really.

My Great Grandmother was very wealthy yet supported communism. the main argument for are simple, give everybody even wealth, that is the fairest society, you cannot deny it the fairest society where everything is evenly distributed, it may not sound fair but I think in many ways it is better than capitalism.

It is not the most fair society because lots of people who are too fat and stupid to deserve money will get money that they do not deserve and people who work very hard and are very good at working will not get what they deserve this is totally unfair and I have already said this and I do not know why I am having to repeat myself over and over.

It's like you have been brainwashed by the liberal media and do not understand economics and what is happening and what is being plotted by 'them' who want to rip up the constitution and make us live in sin and communism, which is a sin itself so that is like saying the same thing twice. But communism is wrong and there are no valid arguments as to why it is good. This is because it is retarded and those arguments do not exist.

If your grandmother was so rich then she would have given all of her money to Russia and communism there would have worked. So she cannot be a true communist and her arguments are void.

Wow- what's the worst thing about this thread...

Is it:

1) Dancing Mustard pretending to be a schoolboy on an internet forum

2) Other posters trying to educate him

3) Dancing mustard dropping out of character and failing miserably to debate questions brought up by his own bizarre attempt at parody.

or

4) That I can't really tell anymore if DM is trolling, or if he's asking to be trolled.

Decisions, decisions...

DM you focus too much on your apparentknowledge that every unemployed person is fat lazy and cant be bothered and a society in which every rich person started form a humble background and worked very hard for his money. As we know this is not the case; many of the super-rich exploit people to get where they are and then stop anybody else entering tehir market using barriers to entry. I can do the purely economic talk wit you if you want and we can discuss the merits of each system.

I expect if we were all open we would come to the same conclusion that every democracy that has better living standards than the US has come to and say that a mixed economy (more towards socialism than the US) does provide the best provision for the country as a whole.

As i say we can commence a purely economical or purely political arguments but i expect we are not as expert yet at least as the people who have made the fairly moderate stance before us. THe most obvious example is that in the UK 90% of the votes were for moderate parties who wish for a mixed system.

Dancing Mustard wrote:It is not the most fair society because lots of people who are too fat and stupid to deserve money will get money that they do not deserve and people who work very hard and are very good at working will not get what they deserve this is totally unfair and I have already said this and I do not know why I am having to repeat myself over and over.

It's like you have been brainwashed by the liberal media and do not understand economics and what is happening and what is being plotted by 'them' who want to rip up the constitution and make us live in sin and communism, which is a sin itself so that is like saying the same thing twice. But communism is wrong and there are no valid arguments as to why it is good. This is because it is retarded and those arguments do not exist.

If your grandmother was so rich then she would have given all of her money to Russia and communism there would have worked. So she cannot be a true communist and her arguments are void.

DM you obviously don't understand why, how and where term communism was invented. Look that up. I think that you are looking it through the glasses of post war USSR, Korea and China.
Yes, it doesn't work, and that's a fact.
As I argued before: main purpose of the communism isn't just to take away from rich and give it to the poor. That could be done in a few months or a year and what after that? Communism implied that there could be no classes in society, where every member was equal in every way. Example: school - that's why we had government colleges (as one of the top students in my class I didn't pay a cent for my studies), medical care - free to all (low cost) , et cetera... Communism had it's advantages, but failed because there are always some "more equal" than others, and societies (or nations) can't be monolithic.

Symmetry wrote:Wow- what's the worst thing about this thread...

Is it:

1) Dancing Mustard pretending to be a schoolboy on an internet forum

2) Other posters trying to educate him

3) Dancing mustard dropping out of character and failing miserably to debate questions brought up by his own bizarre attempt at parody.

or

4) That I can't really tell anymore if DM is trolling, or if he's asking to be trolled.

Decisions, decisions...

You are a smart man.

ignotus wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:It is not the most fair society because lots of people who are too fat and stupid to deserve money will get money that they do not deserve and people who work very hard and are very good at working will not get what they deserve this is totally unfair and I have already said this and I do not know why I am having to repeat myself over and over.

It's like you have been brainwashed by the liberal media and do not understand economics and what is happening and what is being plotted by 'them' who want to rip up the constitution and make us live in sin and communism, which is a sin itself so that is like saying the same thing twice. But communism is wrong and there are no valid arguments as to why it is good. This is because it is retarded and those arguments do not exist.

If your grandmother was so rich then she would have given all of her money to Russia and communism there would have worked. So she cannot be a true communist and her arguments are void.

DM you obviously don't understand why, how and where term communism was invented. Look that up. I think that you are looking it through the glasses of post war USSR, Korea and China.
Yes, it doesn't work, and that's a fact.
As I argued before: main purpose of the communism isn't just to take away from rich and give it to the poor. That could be done in a few months or a year and what after that? Communism implied that there could be no classes in society, where every member was equal in every way. Example: school - that's why we had government colleges (as one of the top students in my class I didn't pay a cent for my studies), medical care - free to all (low cost) , et cetera... Communism had it's advantages, but failed because there are always some "more equal" than others, and societies (or nations) can't be monolithic.

Note: DM's being sarcastic.

autoload wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Wow- what's the worst thing about this thread...

Is it:

1) Dancing Mustard pretending to be a schoolboy on an internet forum

2) Other posters trying to educate him

3) Dancing mustard dropping out of character and failing miserably to debate questions brought up by his own bizarre attempt at parody.

or

4) That I can't really tell anymore if DM is trolling, or if he's asking to be trolled.

Decisions, decisions...

You are a smart man.

That could be true...

Oh, hell, buy me a troll, troll me some more and call me a troll!

Believe me, I know DM quite well, and he's being serious.

Norse wrote:Believe me, I know DM quite well, and he's being serious.

You mean in his opinions or rhetorical style?[/code]