Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
If I babysit your account while you go to Cancun, am I a multi? No, that's right. I'm not. You're a dipshit, though.GabonX wrote:This was an example of four people having four accounts.
If a husband and wife have a regular home and a beach house they each have two houses.Ditocoaf wrote:GabonX wrote:You're wrong. If two people share their accounts they both have two accounts, meaning they are both multis.Ditocoaf wrote:NOBODY HAD MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS! THEY EACH HAD ONE ACCOUNT! NONE OF THEM HAD MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT!rules wrote:Rule #1: No multiple accounts
Multiple accounts are discovered by routine scans and community cheating reports. They are strictly forbidden whether or not they play in the same games. If you suspect certain accounts belong to the same person, please report it following the instructions at the top of the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum.
THERE WERE NEVER MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT BELONGING TO THE SAME PERSON!
I'm not saying this is a conspiracy. I'm not accusing twill of purposely targeting people. I am simply objecting that the rules are being enforced in an inappropriate and unpredictable manner.
This was an example of four people having four accounts.
If I feed your dog one day, and I also own a dog, this does not mean I own two dogs. I am interacting with yours.
browng-08 wrote:If I babysit your account while you go to Cancun, am I a multi? No, that's right. I'm not. You're a dipshit, though.GabonX wrote:This was an example of four people having four accounts.
GabonX wrote:If a husband and wife have a regular home and a beach house they each have two houses.Ditocoaf wrote:GabonX wrote:You're wrong. If two people share their accounts they both have two accounts, meaning they are both multis.Ditocoaf wrote:NOBODY HAD MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS! THEY EACH HAD ONE ACCOUNT! NONE OF THEM HAD MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT!rules wrote:Rule #1: No multiple accounts
Multiple accounts are discovered by routine scans and community cheating reports. They are strictly forbidden whether or not they play in the same games. If you suspect certain accounts belong to the same person, please report it following the instructions at the top of the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum.
THERE WERE NEVER MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT BELONGING TO THE SAME PERSON!
I'm not saying this is a conspiracy. I'm not accusing twill of purposely targeting people. I am simply objecting that the rules are being enforced in an inappropriate and unpredictable manner.
This was an example of four people having four accounts.
If I feed your dog one day, and I also own a dog, this does not mean I own two dogs. I am interacting with yours.
Permission from whom? Oh, that's right! Permission from the owners. And where do you not see this happening?GabonX wrote:browng-08 wrote:If I babysit your account while you go to Cancun, am I a multi? No, that's right. I'm not. You're a dipshit, though.GabonX wrote:This was an example of four people having four accounts.
Actually it is against the rules if you don't get permission. There are rules and they do not conform to your understanding of them.
GabonX wrote:If a husband and wife have a regular home and a beach house they each have two houses.Ditocoaf wrote:GabonX wrote:You're wrong. If two people share their accounts they both have two accounts, meaning they are both multis.Ditocoaf wrote:NOBODY HAD MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS! THEY EACH HAD ONE ACCOUNT! NONE OF THEM HAD MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT!rules wrote:Rule #1: No multiple accounts
Multiple accounts are discovered by routine scans and community cheating reports. They are strictly forbidden whether or not they play in the same games. If you suspect certain accounts belong to the same person, please report it following the instructions at the top of the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum.
THERE WERE NEVER MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT BELONGING TO THE SAME PERSON!
I'm not saying this is a conspiracy. I'm not accusing twill of purposely targeting people. I am simply objecting that the rules are being enforced in an inappropriate and unpredictable manner.
This was an example of four people having four accounts.
If I feed your dog one day, and I also own a dog, this does not mean I own two dogs. I am interacting with yours.
Ditocoaf wrote:If a husband and a wife are separated and each own a house individually, but the wife uses the husband's house for a week, she still owns only one house.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:If a husband and a wife are separated and each own a house individually, but the wife uses the husband's house for a week, she still owns only one house.
No, they both would have to sell their houses to pay the lawyer fees.
jonesthecurl wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:If a husband and a wife are separated and each own a house individually, but the wife uses the husband's house for a week, she still owns only one house.
No, they both would have to sell their houses to pay the lawyer fees.
darn right. I just let my first wife have the bloody house. Fighting over it would hae cost us the house. We'd only just started paying the mortagae at the time anyhow, so I didn'y have but a few months' payments invested.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Ditocoaf wrote:If a husband and a wife are separated and each own a house individually, but the wife uses the husband's house for a week, she still owns only one house.
No, they both would have to sell their houses to pay the lawyer fees.
mpjh wrote:righteous indignation gives way to trolling
Superior, DM would love it.
mpjh wrote:righteous indignation gives way to trolling
Superior, DM would love it.
PLAYER57832 wrote:On a serious note, it could be that this should be spelled out a bit better in the rules. There seems to be a fine line between account sitting and this multis business.
Ditocoaf wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:On a serious note, it could be that this should be spelled out a bit better in the rules. There seems to be a fine line between account sitting and this multis business.
It depends on what you do with the other person's account: If you take someone else's turn, it's account sitting, unless you're doing it without their permission, in which case it's account stealing. If you post, it's equivalent to making yourself a second account. Apparently.
clapper011 wrote:clapper011 wrote:Max did get busted as well, one of his friends bought him premium again....
Ditocoaf wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:On a serious note, it could be that this should be spelled out a bit better in the rules. There seems to be a fine line between account sitting and this multis business.
It depends on what you do with the other person's account: If you take someone else's turn, it's account sitting, unless you're doing it without their permission, in which case it's account stealing. If you post, it's equivalent to making yourself a second account. Apparently.
Ditocoaf wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:On a serious note, it could be that this should be spelled out a bit better in the rules. There seems to be a fine line between account sitting and this multis business.
It depends on what you do with the other person's account: If you take someone else's turn, it's account sitting, unless you're doing it without their permission, in which case it's account stealing. If you post, it's equivalent to making yourself a second account. Apparently.