Page 6 of 12

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:25 pm
by keyborn

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:30 pm
by tyche73
Big Whiskey wrote:
tyche73 wrote:myself and gecko were +4 after round 1.. i posted 3 wins (1 loss) = +2???????


Sorry about that guys.Its tough trying to keep up with all the games.But if anyone sees a error please correct me a.s.a.p thanks..





thank you

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:44 pm
by endar1077
Big Whiskey wrote:But if anyone sees a error please correct me a.s.a.p thanks..


There's some sort of error in Round 1 scores. There are three teams listed as -1 and only two listed as +1. Likewise there is an extra +3 compared to the -3's.

EDIT: It looks like bridge2far/DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID is only supposed to be +1.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:56 pm
by endar1077
Two victories for us:
[game]4238273[/game]
[game]4238243[/game]

EDIT: Actually, I'm not sure which games you have recorded and which you haven't, but we are currently ahead, 4v3. Two games remain.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:43 pm
by endar1077
Big Whiskey wrote:I am starting to think you are questioning the way I am running my tournament endar1077.The team you are going against are AMGecko/tyche73 +4.Correct?Please go to the standing and look right next to there +4.They have 3 games still going.So,u can end up playing a +1 team.Is that ok with you?They might end up +7.I dont know endar1077.But I am doing they best I can to keep things as fair as possible.It seems to me,that you are the only 1 that has said anything to me about the way things are going.1st time you did,I changed a rule to make things more comfortable.If you like,you can start a doubles tournament up and make the rules and who plays who the way you best see fit.


Fair enough. You have an interesting style - it's like Roosevelt, speaking softly at first, and then flashing your big stick. :lol:

Actually, after I read this and noticed what seemed like defensiveness, I suspected that you were deliberately manipulating the match-ups to benefit your own team while sabotaging your greatest rivals (such as that 1st seed team I am currently playing). Anyway, the reason I took so long to respond is that I waited until I had a bit of spare time in the real world and conducted myself a little investigation. Turns out you are clean as a whistle. It seems the only mistake you made was to anticipate my own team doing worse than it actually did, since you paired us with a higher seed than should have been while pairing our first-round-opponents with a lower seed than should have been. That's understandable, I'm more than satisfied as to your honesty.

I do, however, disagree with the implication that the last change you made was for my benefit, and that I somehow owe you a debt because of it. All I did was point the problems with a problematic rule. You decided to remove it, and I suspect that even before I pointed out the problems, you were aware of them, so don't even try to hold me responsible for that (and the fact that I at first presented my case un-diplomatically and then apologized is completely irrelevant, so don't even think about it).

For what it's worth, I've greatly enjoyed the games I've played so far in your tourney. My current partner and I have only just begun playing doubles together, but I think it's a good match and I look forward to seeing how the rest of the tourney turns out.

Cheers,
endar1077

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:40 pm
by Blitzaholic
Blitz + BW won this game

[game]4238206[/game]

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:59 pm
by Blitzaholic
blitz & bw won this game as well 4238077

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:39 am
by Big Whiskey
endar1077 wrote:
Big Whiskey wrote:But if anyone sees a error please correct me a.s.a.p thanks..


There's some sort of error in Round 1 scores. There are three teams listed as -1 and only two listed as +1. Likewise there is an extra +3 compared to the -3's.

EDIT: It looks like bridge2far/DAT_WAT_SHE_SAID is only supposed to be +1.


Well b4 u think I am conspiring, ;) All 1st round scores are correct.They are not in order,which may have thrown you off.The reason why is because of round 2 scores changing positions.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:13 am
by Big Whiskey
updated

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:52 pm
by hiddendragon
dom and I have won games [game]4238324[/game] and [game]4238259[/game] in round 2 so far

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:26 pm
by Iccinot Nabrus
Beagle Brigade and Iccinot Nabrus win: [game]4238248[/game].

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:52 pm
by Donkey

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:18 pm
by Big Whiskey
updated

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:45 am
by Greycloak
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4238274

Another win for team donkeycloak

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:17 am
by Iccinot Nabrus
Beagle Brigade and Iccinot Nabrus win: [game]4238207[/game].

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:59 am
by Big Whiskey
updated

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:43 pm
by Iccinot Nabrus
Beagle Brigade and Iccinot Nabrus won: [game]4238078[/game].
Only 1 game to go, [game]4238154[/game].
Still a flip coin on that game.
Slim lead by Bridge and DAT.
An excellent team.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:32 pm
by Big Whiskey
updated

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:34 pm
by keyborn
CanadaVepsin/bamage are more than likely going to win the last two games of our match in round two. That puts JC and I with a -2 for two rounds. We went 4-5 both rounds, playing some of the best doubles competition on CC. I only hope we are around for round three. By the way BW...are the tournament scores reset after the bottom four are eliminated or do they carry into round three?

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:18 am
by Dominator7
Dominator7/hiddendragon win the following round 2 games against Chariot of Fire/Daryth
[game]4238235[/game]
[game]4238285[/game]
[game]4238185[/game]
[game]4238324[/game]
[game]4238259[/game]

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:39 pm
by Big Whiskey
keyborn wrote:CanadaVepsin/bamage are more than likely going to win the last two games of our match in round two. That puts JC and I with a -2 for two rounds. We went 4-5 both rounds, playing some of the best doubles competition on CC. I only hope we are around for round three. By the way BW...are the tournament scores reset after the bottom four are eliminated or do they carry into round three?


yes,all points carry over pal.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:13 pm
by Big Whiskey
all standings are updated..

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:08 am
by endar1077
[game]4238170[/game] and [game]4238197[/game] both victories for jj and I.
That should put us at +3 for this round, which makes me very happy.
We had some luck, but I'm crossing my fingers that it isn't all we have.

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:14 am
by Donkey
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4238293


Final game for round 2 is a win for Donkey and Greycloak

Re: MASTERS OF DOUBLES (FULL)

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:16 pm
by Big Whiskey
updated