Conquer Club

thehippo8 wrote:ALTOGETHER NOW ... IN A LOUD VOICE

WHY DO YA BUILD ME UP, BUTTERCUP...!

Oh, sorry

-Sully

unvote vote sully I am too tempted

Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!

thehippo8 wrote:
The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!

I think he is scared of me

TeeGee wrote:

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

chapcrap wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

my bad, if anyone wants to know, I fixed a stuff up where I accidentally doubled up on the colour codes.

However as I broke a rule. I await my punishment

Chap, can you confirm he just edited something meaningless?

I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

That's because this forum is under TeeGee's department's 'jurisdiction', thus he has master editing powers that can't be seen unless he wants them to! I can do the same in the Conquer Club Newsletter and Announcements forums.

*waves his magical wand*

-Sully

TeeGee wrote:

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

TheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressive

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

TheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.

The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressive

Why are you accusing me of being aggressive? I didn't FOS him, didn't vote him, made a harmless comment. As a result you quote me, criticize me, and call me aggressive? FOS, Squirrel, FOS...

I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

This was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

TheGeneral2112 wrote:

usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.

This was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

Fair point , I will give you something

unvote vote chapcrap

This post was edited.

Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.

Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?

chapcrap wrote:

TeeGee wrote:

usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt here

This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.

What 2112 said. All I did was point out a mistake and say it wasn't important.

unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112

Let's stay classy, eh?

-Sully

Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?

I suppose it's only fair.

I feel like TheGeneral is using a scapegoat-type method to get TeeGee lynched. It was clearly a newb mistake and didn't have any malicious intent. I feel like TheGeneral is just using it as an excuse to get a townie lynched.

-Sully

Victor Sullivan wrote:I feel like TheGeneral is using a scapegoat-type method to get TeeGee lynched. It was clearly a newb mistake and didn't have any malicious intent. I feel like TheGeneral is just using it as an excuse to get a townie lynched.

-Sully

i would like to know how you know the TeeGee is a townie? I haven't read anything even remotely suggesting he's a townie. Unless you know something the rest of us don't Unless you're cryptically saying that you're mafia!? Or are you saying that TheGeneral is mafia? Please enlighten us Sully.

usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.

True that, and how quickly people get off track!

I can understand Victor questioning 2112, but frankly he just looks a little pressured and isn't so used to the effect his words have. Unlike you Victor, you know exactly what you are doing. That's what I call passive aggressive but it's aggressive all the same!

As to TeeGee making an edit, you are playing Johnny-come-lately Isaiah. I was there and saw the before and after. So, for the benefit of all, the first was ...

unvote vote chapcrap

and the second ...

unvote vote chapcrap

Now, for those of you who are skimming, 2112 voted for chap. And chap (and I) saw the vote change. Chap mentioned it, and 2112 explained. Given chap had the greatest reason to pursue this and now chooses not to, unfortunately, I can find nothing useful here in this!!

But Chap said ...

chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

So, again for the skimmers, I started some pressure on TeeGee because of his silence. Once he had spoken up I considered that I had no reason to pursue that pressure by way of a vote. I appreciate, Isaiah, that you are asking more of TeeGee and I agree we have little information to go on at this time, certainly not enough to clear TeeGee one way or the other!

There is now some fractionation of voting and discussion, which later I reckon will be telling as to who is on who's side and why! For now FOS Victor, either explain that you are skimming in your vote or you are the proverbial fly in the ointment!