Conquer Club

hecter wrote:And now for something completely different...

mpjh wrote:McCain just can't resist chocolate.

mpjh wrote:McCain just can't resist chocolate.

McCain is actually looking at the moderator and releasing his stress by making a funny face.

PopeBenXVI wrote:For the record I would vote for Chuck Baldwin...no one asked me until now so how was I being hypocritical? You just assumed mccain. I do not disagree with you about our country....it's last 40 years and what this country should be as opposed to who is in charge and what they have done to it. The constitution has been dead for some time.

whether or not this country is radical in some ways does not mean we can vote for radicals. Obama, like everyone else is judged by the company he keeps. Unless he is trying to make the Bombers & overseas radical leaders repent for their sins by hanging out with them like Jesus then they are his buds.

If you believe "whites" infected them just as wright does then that is racist and proves my point. Even if what you say is acctually true, just because those who did it were maybe white does not allow anti white speech! They do not represent all the other "white people" . That is a serious double standard because if I wrote in a book the reason our country has crime is because of black people's greed to want what I have, I would be strung up!

He has slipped up way too many times in his book, personal relationships with questionable people, insulting Americans who "cling to guns and religion" etc....to deserve the Presidency.

comic boy wrote:

PopeBenXVI wrote:For the record I would vote for Chuck Baldwin...no one asked me until now so how was I being hypocritical? You just assumed mccain. I do not disagree with you about our country....it's last 40 years and what this country should be as opposed to who is in charge and what they have done to it. The constitution has been dead for some time.

whether or not this country is radical in some ways does not mean we can vote for radicals. Obama, like everyone else is judged by the company he keeps. Unless he is trying to make the Bombers & overseas radical leaders repent for their sins by hanging out with them like Jesus then they are his buds.

If you believe "whites" infected them just as wright does then that is racist and proves my point. Even if what you say is acctually true, just because those who did it were maybe white does not allow anti white speech! They do not represent all the other "white people" . That is a serious double standard because if I wrote in a book the reason our country has crime is because of black people's greed to want what I have, I would be strung up!

He has slipped up way too many times in his book, personal relationships with questionable people, insulting Americans who "cling to guns and religion" etc....to deserve the Presidency.

On the contrary your last point proves that he thoroughly deserves the presidency, the overwhelming obsesion with guns and religion is doing the USA no favours at all. Going to church, loudly singing the National Anthem and being pictured holding a hunting rifle do not qualify anybody for high office yet these things appear to sway millions of votes, it is daft.

Hologram wrote:

Ditocoaf wrote:

strike wolf wrote: So you are basing Obama's current judgement skills based on something he was involved in for a relatively short period of time when he was just 10 years old?

b.k. barunt wrote:Good God! Obama was in the same room with a terrorist at age 10?!!! Holy shit! Someone better do something! The same fooking room?!!!!! God help us! What's this fooking world coming to?!!!

(the irony of this situation is that one of you may run for president one day, and have your intelligence severely questioned because you once frequented the same forum as this incredible assclown) Go fooking figure.

Owned and owned.

Nah, bk knew what was going on, thus the overly dramatic response (even for bk)

heavycola wrote:

comic boy wrote:

PopeBenXVI wrote:For the record I would vote for Chuck Baldwin...no one asked me until now so how was I being hypocritical? You just assumed mccain. I do not disagree with you about our country....it's last 40 years and what this country should be as opposed to who is in charge and what they have done to it. The constitution has been dead for some time.

whether or not this country is radical in some ways does not mean we can vote for radicals. Obama, like everyone else is judged by the company he keeps. Unless he is trying to make the Bombers & overseas radical leaders repent for their sins by hanging out with them like Jesus then they are his buds.

If you believe "whites" infected them just as wright does then that is racist and proves my point. Even if what you say is acctually true, just because those who did it were maybe white does not allow anti white speech! They do not represent all the other "white people" . That is a serious double standard because if I wrote in a book the reason our country has crime is because of black people's greed to want what I have, I would be strung up!

He has slipped up way too many times in his book, personal relationships with questionable people, insulting Americans who "cling to guns and religion" etc....to deserve the Presidency.

On the contrary your last point proves that he thoroughly deserves the presidency, the overwhelming obsesion with guns and religion is doing the USA no favours at all. Going to church, loudly singing the National Anthem and being pictured holding a hunting rifle do not qualify anybody for high office yet these things appear to sway millions of votes, it is daft.

It's incredible that there are people who believe that driving her kids to sports practice and shooting reindeer qualifies sarah palin for highest office.

barbie wrote:

heavycola wrote:

comic boy wrote:

PopeBenXVI wrote:For the record I would vote for Chuck Baldwin...no one asked me until now so how was I being hypocritical? You just assumed mccain. I do not disagree with you about our country....it's last 40 years and what this country should be as opposed to who is in charge and what they have done to it. The constitution has been dead for some time.

whether or not this country is radical in some ways does not mean we can vote for radicals. Obama, like everyone else is judged by the company he keeps. Unless he is trying to make the Bombers & overseas radical leaders repent for their sins by hanging out with them like Jesus then they are his buds.

If you believe "whites" infected them just as wright does then that is racist and proves my point. Even if what you say is acctually true, just because those who did it were maybe white does not allow anti white speech! They do not represent all the other "white people" . That is a serious double standard because if I wrote in a book the reason our country has crime is because of black people's greed to want what I have, I would be strung up!

He has slipped up way too many times in his book, personal relationships with questionable people, insulting Americans who "cling to guns and religion" etc....to deserve the Presidency.

On the contrary your last point proves that he thoroughly deserves the presidency, the overwhelming obsesion with guns and religion is doing the USA no favours at all. Going to church, loudly singing the National Anthem and being pictured holding a hunting rifle do not qualify anybody for high office yet these things appear to sway millions of votes, it is daft.

It's incredible that there are people who believe that driving her kids to sports practice and shooting reindeer qualifies sarah palin for highest office.

It's incredible that there are people who believe being a senator for 13 months qualifies Barack Obama for highest office. Sarah palin was a mayor,(ex. experience) and a governor (executive experience), while also driving her kids to sports practice. Obama is the top of the ticket, lets all remember that. Everyone who ran against Obama in the primary said he didn't have the experience, all people who knew him and were in the same party as him.

mpjh wrote:
We should have a game "Six Degrees of Separation to a Terrorist".

Hologram wrote:

Ditocoaf wrote:

strike wolf wrote: So you are basing Obama's current judgement skills based on something he was involved in for a relatively short period of time when he was just 10 years old?

b.k. barunt wrote:Good God! Obama was in the same room with a terrorist at age 10?!!! Holy shit! Someone better do something! The same fooking room?!!!!! God help us! What's this fooking world coming to?!!!

(the irony of this situation is that one of you may run for president one day, and have your intelligence severely questioned because you once frequented the same forum as this incredible assclown) Go fooking figure.

Owned and owned.

Nah, bk knew what was going on, thus the overly dramatic response (even for bk)

Strike wolf was totally caught though.

barbie wrote:It's incredible that there are people who believe being a senator for 13 months qualifies Barack Obama for highest office. Sarah palin was a mayor,(ex. experience) and a governor (executive experience), while also driving her kids to sports practice. Obama is the top of the ticket, lets all remember that. Everyone who ran against Obama in the primary said he didn't have the experience, all people who knew him and were in the same party as him.

Juan_Bottom wrote:Former UT law grad sues Obama, questions citizenship
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Fre ... &From=News

It's gainning some momentum!

Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm not kidding around, but I'm not taking sides either. Wouldn't you at least like to see the evidence(birth certificate) before you choose a side? Remember, this isn't some conspircacy theorist who has brought the charges.

Juan_Bottom wrote:I'm not kidding around, but I'm not taking sides either. Wouldn't you at least like to see the evidence(birth certificate) before you choose a side? Remember, this isn't some conspircacy theorist who has brought the charges.

The1exile wrote:and further we've got other evidence (like the fact that no-one's proved this before in an attempt to discredit Obama, and the newspaper)

The1exile wrote:versus this currently non-existing birth certificate from kenya?

Dancing Mustard wrote:Everyone is a conspiracy theorist, but there's a conspiracy made by big media that stops us from finding out about it.

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:Everyone is a conspiracy theorist, but there's a conspiracy made by big media that stops us from finding out about it.

I don't know what you mean?

Juan_Bottom wrote:

The1exile wrote:versus this currently non-existing birth certificate from kenya?

Berg claims to have it. How do you know that it does not exis? Because you have not seen it? You might as well say vaginas can't exist, because The1exile has never seen one.