Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:11 pm**

vote freezie

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:13 pm**

I've got double voting powers that I didn't know of apparantly :lol:

Anyways, I would like to unvote neutrino and keep the vote on freezie. (it makes me feel big if the person turns out scum and I am the first name on the list of voters)

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:14 pm**

vote freezie as to not cause confusion from my last move.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:17 pm**

VOTE COUNT

Freezie (5) - Wicked, Ga7, AK, M Lion, Nagerus
AK Iceman 2.0 (4) - Huck, Selin, Serbia, Fircoal
Neutrino (4) - , Kalish, Syzygy, Trestain, Freezie,
Fircoal (1) - Talapus,
Ga7 (2) - Gimpy, Jnd
Wicked (1) - MM

With 24 alive it takes 13 to lynch.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:56 pm**

Still no answer to my question from AK 2.0 regarding to his role.

Although there are other possibilities for voting now, my vote will stay with AK 2.0, unless I get an answer from him.

.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:57 pm**

Selin wrote:Still no answer to my question from AK 2.0 regarding to his role.

Although there are other possibilities for voting now, my vote will stay with AK 2.0, unless I get an answer from him.

.

Huh? Could you ask it again or link to it?

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:05 pm**

AK_iceman wrote:
Selin wrote:Still no answer to my question from AK 2.0 regarding to his role.

Although there are other possibilities for voting now, my vote will stay with AK 2.0, unless I get an answer from him.

.

Huh? Could you ask it again or link to it?

page 92

I asked, if the wording of your role is the same as wicked's.

.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:08 pm**

Hrm. I guess freezie messed up on a couple things in his role claim. I dunno if it's enough for a vote but it's pretty damn suspicious. He's my target if nothing else comes up.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:17 pm**

another vote for if. hope ya'll are right about this
unvote vote freezie

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:25 pm**

Selin wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
Selin wrote:Still no answer to my question from AK 2.0 regarding to his role.

Although there are other possibilities for voting now, my vote will stay with AK 2.0, unless I get an answer from him.

.

Huh? Could you ask it again or link to it?

page 92

I asked, if the wording of your role is the same as wicked's.

.

So basically you want to know if I'm a Jedi?

My win condition is the same as wicked's.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:50 pm**

wicked wrote:Does anyone else have "when" instead of "if"?

mine has if in it too by the way

freezie wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:You are Cal Omas (Townie/Locked Role)

You are a New Republic Senator, representing the displaced people of Alderaan. At this time your only power is to vote, but this could change in the future.

You win when all the threats to the New Republic have been eliminated.

Confirm in the game thread.

There, do what you want with it.

Of course I had a '' power-role'' the problem is I don't know what it is. Yet.

unvote vote freezie

there is another part of this so called pm freezie has which is wrong aswell :wink:

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:56 pm**

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Omas

That doesn't sound like a very "good" role freezie. Also, I don't see any reference to New Jedi Order anywhere.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:02 pm**

just so you all know the other mistake i have noticed has nothing to do with the colour he wrote his name or the slight difference in his win condition.

.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:41 pm**

WHEN IF.

That's the direct quote from Mandy. If I even had made up that quote, it would have been a stupid idea from me.

Exile slipped letting us know they had fake roles. So even if you think mine is faked, I wouldn't have written it.

Well, I didn't write it either way..

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:54 pm**

mandalorian2298 wrote:To Quote or not to Quote
If you quote your role, I will neither Mod-Kill you nor particulary care. However, if you start a mass role-claim, you will be doing a MASSIVE favour to the Yuzhaan Vong (Mafia), while accomplishing nothing for the Town. You have been warned.
However, I will ask that you don't quote pictures that you received with your role, because they use to much room. If you desperatly want for the other players to see how beutifull your character is , put in a link to your character's page on http://www.starwars.com.

Fine, Can I at least Role-Claim?
Of course you can. However, many roles will face quick and ignoble death (not Mod-Kill, but “natural” causes ) if they claim. So, Mass role-claim = Mafia wins.

I have a few thoughts. Could these two rules be connected? He says a mass roleclaim would be a massive favor to the Vong. Then it says many roles will face death of "natural" causes if they claim. Could we then assume that only non-Vong characters would die of natural causes? If so, would this mean that Vong players would be more easily able to roleclaim? Exile mentioned the Vong having "fake roleclaims." If they have fake roleclaims, would that be yet another reason that they could more easily roleclaim? :-k

If all this was true, who so far has had no problem roleclaiming?

just thinking out loud...

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:11 pm**

Vote Freezie as I don't think Mandy could have made so many differences with the roles, adding to that the previous scummy behavior it's too fishy.

I've been wondering about that ML, since it seems Wicked had no problem roleclaiming before I think either specific people have a chance to die if they claim or it's linked to some kind of event (eg the vong or a third party can kill someone right away if they identify him maybe...)

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:51 pm**

Dood, where did everyone go?

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:59 pm**

MountainLion wrote:I have a few thoughts. Could these two rules be connected? He says a mass roleclaim would be a massive favor to the Vong. Then it says many roles will face death of "natural" causes if they claim. Could we then assume that only non-Vong characters would die of natural causes? If so, would this mean that Vong players would be more easily able to roleclaim? Exile mentioned the Vong having "fake roleclaims." If they have fake roleclaims, would that be yet another reason that they could more easily roleclaim?

If all this was true, who so far has had no problem roleclaiming?

just thinking out loud...

Thats a good thought ML, probably worth following. And conveniently suits the present situation.

Oh and my pm says 'if' also...

Unvote, Vote: Freezie

Trestain, I think that I see what your saying.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:03 pm**

Everyone on the if bandwagon has yet to realise than even mafia's fake roles are wirtten by mandy..

:roll:

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:13 pm**

How do you know there's a whole fake role PM and not just a fake name (which is usually how it's been done in the past)? Or any of that for that matter... did exile ever claim to show us he had a fake name? remember moz's role PM; that was obviously made up by moz? that's what ended up catching him in the end.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:13 pm**

Because exile slipped about saying scums had fake CLAIMS

Not names.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:24 pm**

yes, what do you think a fake claim IS?

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:27 pm**

I beleive that's why he allows PM's quoting, because they can quote fake claims.

So..

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:38 pm**

vote: freezie

IF!

Also a fake claim is usually just a fake name.

Posted: **Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:16 pm**

Those will be my last words:

AD intentions may be true, his names give me the creeps. Althought mine is blue.

While wicked ml and Panckemix are linked, althought you know the weakest link.

May Fircoal lives in peace, his life will be short.

In greater reapect to Nag, my best salutations.

Vote: freezie

Conquer Club

New Jedi Order Mafia MOZ & VONG WIN

Re: New Jedi Order Mafia DAY 3 NO IMPORTANT ANOUNCEMENT :&qu

Re: New Jedi Order Mafia DAY 3 NO IMPORTANT ANOUNCEMENT :&am