Page 8 of 29
Re: HALL OF FAME
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:55 am
by Blitzaholic
Bones2484 wrote:Behavior/attitude only keeps players OUT of the Hall of Fame in sports.
ty cobb was one of the most ruthless and racist people around, he is in hall of fame
wilt chamberlain claims to have slept with over 1000 women, slutting around, in hall of fame
rickey henderson, one of the cockiest ever in history, he is in hall of fame
lawrence taylor, all sorts of legal issue, he is hall of fame
charles barkley controversial, anger issues, oui's, in hall of fame
michael irvin, more legals issues, coke issues, in hall of fame
on and on and on
i think attitude and behavior if positive helps, again, like i said, that alone does not get you in, you have to be also great, better than most during your era, the attitude and behavior helps some
Re: HALL OF FAME
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:19 am
by Bones2484
Blitz, that wasn't my point at all.
Good for you, you named players who have bad attitudes but still made the hall. But can you come up with anyone in a HoF who had bad stats but a great personality?
On the other hand, you have people whose character flaws keep them out. Shoeless Joe Jackson, Pete Rose, Mark McGwire (who was LOVED as a player)... not to mention all the other steroid users who will never see a plaque.
Re: HALL OF FAME
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:41 pm
by Blitzaholic
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:Lindax wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:I agree Lindax, I dont think you need to have be # 1 or a conqueror, it may help, yes, however, there is 12 criteria, say you lindax met like 9 or 10 of those 12, well, I think that would be good to get you in. make sense?
Got it, and yep, it makes sense
.
ok, if it goes thru and lack pm;s me again, i know he's busy, I can consider you a juror, I would need 12 fair cc people and to look at those 12 criteria and decide from there.
I see you changed some of the subjects since we talked
and I see you won a tourney since we last discussed this topic.
Scott-Land wrote:I'm loyal and honest = )
ok, you are on the Juror of 12, so far you and Lx
Re: HALL OF FAME
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:22 pm
by HighlanderAttack
This thread is pretty big. I have read some but not all. I would like to add my input.
I think you don't need requirements, but guidelines. I think at least three years should be the only requirement.
12 jurors or panel members is a great idea. I think they should be nominated. I think the panel should consist of 6 players and 6 mods.
I think nominations for Hall of Fame should come from players and this panel. I think 5 from each and out of the 10 players nominated, I feel 5 should be entered into the Hall of Fame every year.
There are many great players and contributors to this site and there are many reasons why players should be added. This is why I don't think exact requirements should be used.
Just my two cents.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:36 pm
by Chuuuuck
I'll help you out with the jury if you would like.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:40 pm
by Blitzaholic
Chuuuuck wrote:I'll help you out with the jury if you would like.
thx added.
we still need like 8 more.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:41 pm
by sensfan
I would love to be a judge, if you would accept me despite my low rank.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:44 pm
by the.killing.44
I'd be up for it
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:45 pm
by Blitzaholic
sensfan wrote:I would love to be a judge, if you would accept me despite my low rank.
you would have to been around awhile and well known by many on CC, I am not sure you have that reputation, but, I thank you for the interest. If you look at page 1 and see any ideas that could help with criteria of making HOF, I would be grateful.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:50 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
This might be why Lack started the Special Contribution medals.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:52 pm
by the.killing.44
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:This might be why Lack started the Special Contribution medals.
For forum contributions, yeah…
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:00 pm
by Incandenza
I'd help out on this conceptual committee, why not.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:05 pm
by eye84free
count me in
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:34 pm
by Blitzaholic
Incandenza wrote:I'd help out on this conceptual committee, why not.
ok, thank you
the.killing.44 wrote:I'd be up for it
added, thx
eye84free wrote:count me in
consider yourself in, appreciate it.
Also, if we draw more interest than 12, then we would have to put it to a vote with a poll to be fair, so you may still be acknowledged sensfan. We would like a committee or 12 that are honest, impartial, have a respectable reputation and have demonstrated competency of the forums, contributions of cc and game skill, strategy, etc.
If or when this gets approved the 12 Judges would need a hidden forum. Myself, or perhaps, Optimus prime, and or lackattack maybe would oversee it or all 3 of us.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:33 pm
by Qwert
1. Longevity: played minimum of 2 years
2. Hit Score of 3500 + @ least 1x
3. Made 1st 5 and Top 5 lists
4. Maintained RANK for long time
5. Membership status of Premium a vast majority of time
6. Stats: singles wins, doubles wins, triples wins, quad wins, assassin, term, total wins, etc.
7. Multiple contributions to CC site, overall enhancement, map making, tournament organizers, clan domination, site workers, forum helpers, posters making it a fun site with threads of popularity evidenced by over 100 pages, etc.
8. Feedback or Ranking System of 4.5 or higher-although somewhat subjective
9. Medals of 20+ and held high score in the process
10. CC players who played Tournaments and Won @ least 1
11. Obtained Conquerer or # 1 on Scoreboard
12. Versitile, demonstrates greatness in a plethera of game plays and gaming styles, on many maps
WOW- blitz you only missing medal for map making,and your road to become member of hall of fame will be open
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:34 pm
by barterer2002
Well I haven't read it all yet but its sounds OK. Just let me know where to go.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:42 pm
by HighlanderAttack
I did post my ideas but forgot to say I would be interested in being on a committee to nominate and vote.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:47 pm
by TheOtherOne
I would like to be on the committee.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:56 pm
by AAFitz
Perhaps I can be a reserve judge. If it makes sense to add me to the mix, than Im up for it. But there may be some more qualified that step forward.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:48 pm
by hwhrhett
comittee me..
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:28 pm
by tdans
hmmm if you need another.. id be willing to help...
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:52 pm
by Georgerx7di
I'm in blitz.
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:00 pm
by Blitzaholic
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I'm on the committee
ok, JR is 1 of them, need 11 more?
Lindax wrote:I like the idea of a Hall of Fame blitzy, and I agree with the requirements in general and I would consider being a juror if I was asked.
Lindax is 2, need 10 more?
Scott-Land wrote:I'm loyal and honest = )
Scott-Land is 3, need 9 more?
Incandenza wrote:I'd help out on this conceptual committee, why not.
Incandenza is 4, need 8 more?
the.killing.44 wrote:I'd be up for it
the.killing.44 is 5, need 7 more?
Chuuuuck wrote:I'll help you out with the jury if you would like.
Chuuuuck is 6, need 6 more?
eye84free wrote:count me in
eye84free is 7, need 5 more?
HighlanderAttack wrote:I would be interested in being on a committee to nominate and vote.
HighlanderAttack is 8, need 4 more?
barterer2002 wrote:Well I haven't read it all yet but its sounds OK. Just let me know where to go.
barterer2002 is 9, need 3 more?
TheOtherOne wrote:I would like to be on the committee.
TheOtherOne is 10, need 2 more?
AAFitz wrote:If it makes sense to add me to the mix, than Im up for it.
AAFitz is 11, need 1 more?
hwhrhett wrote:comittee me..
hwhrhett is 12, full
Georgerx7di wrote:Yeah, I'd be in for this.
I may need to do a poll now
tdans wrote:hmmm if you need another.. id be willing to help...
I may need to get players to vote.
sensfan wrote:I would love to be a judge, if you would accept me despite my low rank.
I need 12 judges and I have 15 that posted interest. Let's hold up here. I have to wean 3 off and may need to put it to a vote with a poll for the CC community to vote on these 15 names choosing 12. The CC community will need to choose the 12 they believe have the most well rounded CC experience in forums, games, reputation, stats, etc.
I also could do this another way. Have you all look at page 1 at the criteria????? Do you have any suggestions to make the eligibility requirements better? Anything I should delete or add?
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:02 pm
by the.killing.44
15 judges is unacceptable?
Re: HALL OF FAME [needing lackattack to comment]
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:16 pm
by Blitzaholic
the.killing.44 wrote:15 judges is unacceptable?
no, but, ideally wanted 12.