Page 8 of 24

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:05 am
by Skoffin
Skittles! wrote:2) you can roast Skoffin for 48 hours BUT she will get the prize



Image
unvote vote skittles

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 9:33 am
by ga7
Now let me tell you youngins a story. It might sound hard to believe, but I was not always everyone's darling in Clusterfucktown.

Indeed, long ago, I was even a proper pot-stirring, shade-giving missus in these here parts. Married I was, to an honest man named Richard, bless his soul.

It all switched up one afternoon, as I was planning to cook a pumpkin soup for dinner. I went shopping for a few ingredients I was missing, but the store was out of Sriracha hot sauce, which was my special ingredient to get Dick going if yall know what I mean *winks*

They had a alternative though, oh I remember it like it was yesterday, named "Granny Bron's handmade cocksauce". Instead of the usual majestic rooster, a crudely drawn cock ornated the bottle. "Ah, whatever" I told myself, and bought it.

And what do you know, the soup turned out delicious! Unfortunately, my poor Richard was so eager to get a third helping (he was a Big Man) that he spilled the pot all over his pants.
My word, even now I can still hear him screaming, "It's burning! My lovetool! It's burning!" (That's what he used to name it, but he had other qualities I assure you).

Right this very moment, my instincts took over. I grabbed the ice-cold lemonade from the table, gulped it, took Dick pants off and started blowing him like there was no tomorrow!

It was a revelation. I had saved Dick, but I knew I couldn't let my talents go to waste. The Clusterfucktown community needed me! I had finally found my true calling in life.

So here you have it, youngins. When life gives you lemonade, go down and blow Dick till you get the cocksauce out.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 11:45 am
by Ragian
Right. So I didn't read that. I felt better about Ga7 before this nonsense...

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 12:06 am
by Skoffin
Ragian wrote:@skoffin, why daddy DJ? He's been cleared by...ahm...fircoal? Someone. So if you like chu, you must also like his train.

(Here's hoping that Skittles! takes pity on ridiculous puns.)

Oh... right yeah lol, guess you got me there

unvote vote Lord

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 1:44 am
by lord voldemort
Fos skoffin for skimming. pretty sloppy

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:54 am
by Ragian
@skoffin, are you just voting anyone at this point?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 7:58 am
by Skoffin
Ragian wrote:@skoffin, are you just voting anyone at this point?


I don't know what would give you that impression

unvote vote Pika

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 8:48 am
by Ragian
Right...so scumhunting - while perhaps not what I'm best at - seems impossible here. One person tells a redundant tale of a hooker when people vote for him, another has an itchy voting finger, and the remaining players play silence chicken.

f*ck this...
Image

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 9:02 am
by Skoffin
What are you talking aboot? We can scumhunt, it's just that everyone went quiet and now we have people mucking around for something to do whil we wait for the lurkers to do something.

Nag used a power on Chu/ga7 - He could be scum, but for now his power sugests to me it's town role.
Ga7 is a usurper hooker, it sounds like a scummy role and he can turn scum later. But he made his identity known to chu when he could have masked it and that role sounds so dumb it could be legit made by skittles
Chu revealed ga7 but he's also defending ga in terms of ga7 didn't have to reveal himself like he did. This suggests to me they are not scum together, at minimum one is town but it's looking like both are probably town.
Chu also says dj is town for unknown reasons

This removes 4 people from the scumhunting pool.
Skoffin, Pika, Ragia, Samlen and lordvoldemort are leftover, so what do you think of them?

Sam voted ga7, but lord seemed to be advocating voting for ga7 without actually doing so yet; which is scummy for the same reason you noted before
so pickle potato scallop already

unvote vote lord




Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 1:15 pm
by Ragian
I feel like you quoted my earlier post and added brains. I like it. Stop confusing me with all the other stuff. I'm very impressionable.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:31 pm
by Samlen
nagerous wrote:Any leads? Ga7, fircoal learn anything interesting ?

ga7 wrote:The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him.

Skoffin wrote:
Nag used a power on Chu/ga7 - He could be scum, but for now his power sugests to me it's town role.
Ga7 is a usurper hooker, it sounds like a scummy role and he can turn scum later. But he made his identity known to chu when he could have masked it and that role sounds so dumb it could be legit made by skittles

Incorrect assumption. Ga's role was revealed to fircoal involuntarily and nag started the day by revealing to fircoal/ga that they were the ones talking to each other. Ga had no other choice but to try and make their role sound town-like since they were already revealed.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 4:04 pm
by Fircoal
Samlen wrote:
nagerous wrote:Any leads? Ga7, fircoal learn anything interesting ?

ga7 wrote:The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him.

Skoffin wrote:
Nag used a power on Chu/ga7 - He could be scum, but for now his power sugests to me it's town role.
Ga7 is a usurper hooker, it sounds like a scummy role and he can turn scum later. But he made his identity known to chu when he could have masked it and that role sounds so dumb it could be legit made by skittles

Incorrect assumption. Ga's role was revealed to fircoal involuntarily and nag started the day by revealing to fircoal/ga that they were the ones talking to each other. Ga had no other choice but to try and make their role sound town-like since they were already revealed.


This is true. He had no choice to do that. Personally I still think he is town due to the way that he has behaved as well as thinking from balancing. If Skittles knew this was a role wouldn't he try to make roles confusing and not sound like what they did?

So while I don't think that line of thought clears him I still do think Frenchie-chan is more likely on the town side.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 1:35 am
by ga7
Samlen wrote:Incorrect assumption. Ga's role was revealed to fircoal involuntarily and nag started the day by revealing to fircoal/ga that they were the ones talking to each other. Ga had no other choice but to try and make their role sound town-like since they were already revealed.

I had a choice to stay hidden. We learnt each other's roles but not our identities. I couldn't predict Nag would out us right away and I thought he couldn't know, that it was what happened when people targeted him. You can't explain why I would do that if I was scum.

[spoiler]
Skoffin wrote: What are you talking aboot? We can scumhunt, it's just that everyone went quiet and now we have people mucking around for something to do whil we wait for the lurkers to do something.

Nag used a power on Chu/ga7 - He could be scum, but for now his power sugests to me it's town role.
Ga7 is a usurper hooker, it sounds like a scummy role and he can turn scum later. But he made his identity known to chu when he could have masked it and that role sounds so dumb it could be legit made by skittles
Chu revealed ga7 but he's also defending ga in terms of ga7 didn't have to reveal himself like he did. This suggests to me they are not scum together, at minimum one is town but it's looking like both are probably town.
Chu also says dj is town for unknown reasons

This removes 4 people from the scumhunting pool.
Skoffin, Pika, Ragia, Samlen and lordvoldemort are leftover, so what do you think of them?

Sam voted ga7, but lord seemed to be advocating voting for ga7 without actually doing so yet; which is scummy for the same reason you noted before
so pickle potato scallop already

unvote vote lord



[/spoiler]
I agree with an astonishing amount of my colleague Skoffin's post.
I would say from the town side I'm not super convinced by Dj's towniness but convinced by his apathy but it's definitely easier to pick from the rest.
Ragian gives me town vibes by asking questions, we'll see.
Skoff is trying hard to play jester, not sure that's the case but doubt she's scum.
Samlen I assume is town cause I dunno why a scum would have role reasons to vote me.
Pika is useless and a pale copy of the real deal.
Lovo is scum. I have the best feeling about him.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:42 am
by lord voldemort
@ Skoffin.

I only havent voted for ga7 because it appears the rest dobt agree with my thoughts on the matter. if it makes me scummy not to vote then sure Vote: GA7

I have no issues with putting my money where my mouth is right now. However this is a lynch we need to ideally get right. we cant really afford to potentially lose a town at lynch and a town on nk.

my thoughts

I dont really understand skoffins behaviour either. she has changed her vote in all but 2-3 of her posts out of at least 15-20. @ ga7 she cant be jester. would of just hammered herself day 1 when she was at L-1

pika: hasnt said much at all
ragian: confused by ga7 role, then jumped onto me
dj: softly cleared by fircoal. literally has said nothing of value and put skoffin at L-1 on day 1. again if not ga7 he is my next person in the cross hair. even with fircoal soft clearing him. I dont really have any kind of good feeling about him.
sam: originally thinking on same lines as nag and me re ga7. and has other info doesnt want to reveal that also makes him sceptical
fircoal: revealed ga7 role. initial reactions was that he was scum but buys the story about ga7 role name being a mod thing
nagerous: is on the ga7 vote and is sceptical of the name etc

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 8:32 am
by Djfireside
Sorry I have been out longer than my usual, entire family caught something nasty so will be catching up on things

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 2:27 pm
by Pikanchion
A large part of ga7's claim to being town sided relies upon Fircoal being town (and being so in an obvious manner based solely on their role's name), as such if ga7 is town then we can be sure that Fircoal is too. We also know that even if ga7 isn't scum they can become scum, and can we really trust their word on the exact mechanisms for this happening? Looks to me that a ga7 lynch at worst gives us two confirmed town (as Fircoal would also clear Djfireside).

My big problem however is the timeline of what happened last night; nagerous picks ga7 and Fircoal to <appropriate verb>, ga7 tries to roleblock nagerous, Fircoal investigates Djfireside. nagerous is not roleblocked and successfully <verbs> ga7 and Fircoal, effectively roleblocking ga7, but somehow Fircoal still manages to successfully investigate Djfireside? Something certainly doesn't seem to add up here.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 2:40 pm
by nagerous
Pikanchion wrote:A large part of ga7's claim to being town sided relies upon Fircoal being town (and being so in an obvious manner based solely on their role's name), as such if ga7 is town then we can be sure that Fircoal is too. We also know that even if ga7 isn't scum they can become scum, and can we really trust their word on the exact mechanisms for this happening? Looks to me that a ga7 lynch at worst gives us two confirmed town (as Fircoal would also clear Djfireside).

My big problem however is the timeline of what happened last night; nagerous picks ga7 and Fircoal to <appropriate verb>, ga7 tries to roleblock nagerous, Fircoal investigates Djfireside. nagerous is not roleblocked and successfully <verbs> ga7 and Fircoal, effectively roleblocking ga7, but somehow Fircoal still manages to successfully investigate Djfireside? Something certainly doesn't seem to add up here.


I actually choose to shove my bussy into one of them which is a roleblock action - I used this on fircoal so it is a bit confusing what has happened. Bus driver perhaps?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 3:01 pm
by ga7
The PM I got said one of us was suffocated by bussy and my action was not successful. So either busdriver or mod switched it? Cause the whole thing wouldn't have happened if my action got through.
Killing me to prove 2 townies is fine and dandy but I really don't think highly of town's chances right now seeing you chumps ignoring pure scumminess.
Chu's powers can't be scum, that I'm sure of. Dj is only if he's not GF. But I find it very interesting that Lovo first tried to get Chu to spell out what was his power, then had to be pushed to vote me (cause he knows I'm town), then claims his second target is someone very likely cleared in Dj. How many tells do you people need?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 3:34 pm
by Ragian
Good call, Samlen. I need a vote count. How many is where and stuff. Is Ga7 voting? Is Pika voting? I see LoVo (brilliant abbreviation) is now voting...

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 5:53 pm
by Skittles!
Vote count

Ga7 (3) - nagerous, samlen, lord voldemort
Lord Voldemort (2) - Ragian, skoffin

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Let's go huntiessssss.

I am putting a deadline for the day for 7PM 21/5 AEST. Roughly 4 days away.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:42 pm
by lord voldemort
You missed a vote skittles

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:46 pm
by Skoffin
No one appreciates the genius of my plai :'(

ga7 wry u no vote den

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 12:07 am
by Pikanchion
Skoffin wrote: No one appreciates the genius of my plai :'(

ga7 wry u no vote den

I appreciate it so much I didn't even OMGUS you!

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 1:05 am
by ga7
Skoffin wrote: No one appreciates the genius of my plai :'(

ga7 wry u no vote den

I will definitely avoid voting unless it's super necessary.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp

Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 9:17 am
by Ragian
@Ga7, why avoid voting?

@Pika, why are you not voting?