Conquer Club

Gilligan wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:Is contacting her "new" boyfriend with a link to the CC thread really necessary? Sure I was always on the doubter side of the story, but isn't that taking it about 5 miles over the line?

Completely agree, Bones. You had no business doing that, Voldo.

Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..

PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..

a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0

owenshooter wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..

a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0

I think he should be sent those pics she posted online too so he can decide for himself if that was just "razor burn."

No-one got anything else to talk about? Nothing better to do?

owenshooter wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..

a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0

I thought you posted a link to the CC thread. That could bring the site into personnal stuff, perhaps legal stuff if she decided to get irate, whether your actions were "justified" or not.

If nothing to do with CC... then its no concern of mine. (I will say that if you give honest information, no problem. If you give incorrect information, it could be harassment)

JoshyBoy wrote:No-one got anything else to talk about? Nothing better to do?

When was the last time you didn't end a sentence with a question mark?

aad0906 wrote:

Im with you. I dont really have an opinion on this matter. I couldnt really care less wtf is going on, but this is some entertaining shit!

InkL0sed wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:No-one got anything else to talk about? Nothing better to do?

When was the last time you didn't end a sentence with a question mark?

Thur March 12, 2009 4:55 am

JoshyBoy wrote:well I guess I dont suck TOO BAD then...

Red Lives

InkL0sed wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:No-one got anything else to talk about? Nothing better to do?

When was the last time you didn't end a sentence with a question mark?

you still mad bro?

I'm trying to help you man; you clearly have some sort of pathological wannabeism...

God damn it, I was going to finish that sentence quite impressively, but then I noticed that the above post was whitestazn's and not JoshyBoy's. Well played.

I'm going into coma reading this thread.

natty_dread wrote:I'm going into coma reading this thread.

+1

You are all mad, bros.

If we derailed this thread onto the topic of dice, could it go back to GD?

I hate the damn dice statistics!

(Get this shit out of my forum).

The dice statistics are loaded! CC cheats!

"Statistics" huh? I'm calling bullshit on that.

I always roll ones, but the statistics show me as having an average of aproximately 3.5 +/-3%! HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?! There isn't even a 3.5 on six-sided dice, much less percentages!

I hope that UN will send Nato(us) troops to defend unarmed civilians.
Waith , these is wrong topic.

qwert wrote:I hope that UN will send Nato(us) troops to defend unarmed civilians.
Waith , these is wrong topic.

+1

However - I expected "Mine dices!"

qwert wrote:I hope that UN will send Nato(us) troops to defend unarmed civilians.
Waith , these is wrong topic.

Al-Qaeda controls the dice!

thegreekdog wrote:I hate the damn dice statistics!

(Get this shit out of my forum).

Then again, letting it die could accomplish the same thing.

The last one didn't die. It took several pages of slut-shaming to finally get it locked. I don't care if the girl has mental issues or not, everything about this, from the trivialization of assault on women (on her part as well, if she's not being honest) to the mouth-breathing porn harvest is disgusting, and it deserves to rot to oblivion in GD where the personality cliques can writhe over it like they normally do. I would take a million of Phatscotty's Tea Party linkvalanches over a single thread obsessing over anyone's personal drama.

Neoteny wrote:The last one didn't die. It took several pages of slut-shaming to finally get it locked. I don't care if the girl has mental issues or not, everything about this, from the trivialization of assault on women (on her part as well, if she's not being honest) to the mouth-breathing porn harvest is disgusting, and it deserves to rot to oblivion in GD where the personality cliques can writhe over it like they normally do. I would take a million of Phatscotty's Tea Party linkvalanches over a single thread obsessing over anyone's personal drama.

Well, it's also about how owenshooter, et. al. were right and how we should praise them for being right or apologize to them for accusing them of not being right... so there's that too.