Conquer Club

Actually, now that I think about it, why haven't the Republicans used this yet? It doesn't add up. They've called in to question all sorts of stuff about Obama that don't seem to matter, or that have even been proven. They outright lied about Rev Wright, Obama's being 'racist,' they were using his ties to Acorn.... his "corruption"... you would think that they would draw attention to this suite.

Juan_Bottom wrote:http://obamacrimes.com/

OBAMA - Admitted:

1. I was born in Kenya.
2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

Hooray!
Don't lie, you want to see these....

Right.

So all the ridiculous allegations that Berg made are true because Obama hasn't responded?

I think that's what he is saying. That Obama had a long legal window to respond(this has been ongoing for months) and that legally, since he didn't fight it, it is an admission of guilt.

But I can't read the PDF files though.

But like I said, from a legal standpoint, I think that Berg has claimed victory.

Juan_Bottom wrote:I think that's what he is saying. That Obama had a long legal window to respond(this has been ongoing for months) and that legally, since he didn't fight it, it is an admission of guilt.

But I can't read the PDF files though.

But like I said, from a legal standpoint, I think that Berg has claimed victory.

The hell? The is nothing legal about that. Someone not denying something does not make them guilty. If you plead the fifth you are not automatically guilty.

Snorri1234 wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:I think that's what he is saying. That Obama had a long legal window to respond(this has been ongoing for months) and that legally, since he didn't fight it, it is an admission of guilt.

But I can't read the PDF files though.

But like I said, from a legal standpoint, I think that Berg has claimed victory.

The hell? The is nothing legal about that. Someone not denying something does not make them guilty. If you plead the fifth you are not automatically guilty.

Yeah, Juan, seriously, that's crazy talk. What kind of ridiculous world is it to live in where we'd actually be convicted for not gracing every moron and troll with attention?

Hey Juan, you're a space alien with a spaceship! If you don't contradict me, that means it's true! (Please don't contradict me. I want to go for a ride on your spaceship. You'd be the best spaceship captain ever. Can I be the weapons officer? That'd be so fucking rad. You could be all like, "Fire the Proton Torpedoes on my command!" and I'd be like, "Aye, Aye Captain!" and then I'd be like, "Oh f*ck this!" and then press fire anyway, and then when the Death Star blows up you'd be like, "HAHA! Jolly good!" AWESOME!)

Juan_Bottom wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, why haven't the Republicans used this yet? It doesn't add up. They've called in to question all sorts of stuff about Obama that don't seem to matter, or that have even been proven. They outright lied about Rev Wright, Obama's being 'racist,' they were using his ties to Acorn.... his "corruption"... you would think that they would draw attention to this suite.

They don't because they know it isn't true.

Frigidus wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, why haven't the Republicans used this yet? It doesn't add up. They've called in to question all sorts of stuff about Obama that don't seem to matter, or that have even been proven. They outright lied about Rev Wright, Obama's being 'racist,' they were using his ties to Acorn.... his "corruption"... you would think that they would draw attention to this suite.

They don't because they know it isn't true.

It's too simple a conclusion... there MUST be more to this.

heavycola wrote:

Frigidus wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, why haven't the Republicans used this yet? It doesn't add up. They've called in to question all sorts of stuff about Obama that don't seem to matter, or that have even been proven. They outright lied about Rev Wright, Obama's being 'racist,' they were using his ties to Acorn.... his "corruption"... you would think that they would draw attention to this suite.

They don't because they know it isn't true.

It's too simple a conclusion... there MUST be more to this.

Damn it, you're blowing our cover!

And now for something completely different:

The McCain Tongue Photoshop Contest Winners!










and my personal favorite...

Those are amazing.

Backglass wrote:

Those two are so amazing. I literally cackled.

pimpdave wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:I think that's what he is saying. That Obama had a long legal window to respond(this has been ongoing for months) and that legally, since he didn't fight it, it is an admission of guilt.

But I can't read the PDF files though.

But like I said, from a legal standpoint, I think that Berg has claimed victory.

The hell? The is nothing legal about that. Someone not denying something does not make them guilty. If you plead the fifth you are not automatically guilty.

Yeah, Juan, seriously, that's crazy talk. What kind of ridiculous world is it to live in where we'd actually be convicted for not gracing every moron and troll with attention?

Hey Juan, you're a space alien with a spaceship! If you don't contradict me, that means it's true! (Please don't contradict me. I want to go for a ride on your spaceship. You'd be the best spaceship captain ever. Can I be the weapons officer? That'd be so fucking rad. You could be all like, "Fire the Proton Torpedoes on my command!" and I'd be like, "Aye, Aye Captain!" and then I'd be like, "Oh f*ck this!" and then press fire anyway, and then when the Death Star blows up you'd be like, "HAHA! Jolly good!" AWESOME!)

I'M NOT SAYING HE'S GUILTY!
I'm saying that from a LEGAL standpoint (in the same way an innocent person can get the chair) that I believe they are calling him guilty. You do know that just because you aren't in court that doesn't mean you can't be found guilty of anything right? Hell, you can be in court, refuse to testify or defend yourself, and be found guilty. Berg is even saying that even though Obama has technically lost, he'll still let him answer the charges.

He had the right to answer, and he didn't and was "convicted" in leu of his refusal to submit the proper documentation.
(And remember a this evidence has actually held up in court!!!!)

Frigidus wrote:They don't because they know it isn't true.

heavycola wrote:It's too simple a conclusion... there MUST be more to this.

Actually, I'm not sure but I think that I agree with Cola on this. Obama's nationality has been legally called to question. And then he lost the case! His OWN FAMILY have sworn that he was born in Africa.
Politicians are not known for telling the truth are they Frigidus? Are you from some magical part of America where politicans answer phone call and then invite you over for dinner? Did I miss something? Because I seem to remember an ass load of smear tactics and outright lies coming from McCain's camp. And that was when they were only down a couple of points.
The election is practially here, and some polls show McCain to be down by 10 points or more! Why wouldn't he want to use this? IT'S AN ACTUAL, LEGAL CASE THAT OBAMA LOST!

Sure you guys can make fun and post all the lizard pictures that you want, but you're only shying away from the question. Why is Berg a tin foil hatter? Why isn't McCain using this to his advantage? I would! Why is this evidence that has held up in court dissmisable to a bunch of jerkers on an internet forum?

Yes, best of the campaign, absolutely.

There are rocks on this planet that exhibit more evidence of intelligence...

Obama's nationality has been legally called to question... and he lost the case.

There is only the myth of this event happening that exists in the real world.

(And remember a this evidence has actually held up in court!!!!)

This "evidence" may have been held up in court somewhere...
Held Up - delayed, as in not yet presented OR held up - as if somebody actually sat in the back of a courtroom somewhere and physically waved the evidence overhead OR held up - whereas the supposed evidence was actually stolen from it's prior possessor. BUT... there was NEVER a hearing where a judge reviewed "the evidence" in a court of law and actually passed down a ruling making a declaration about the status of Barack Obama's US citizenship.

Berg is even saying that even though Obama has technically lost, he'll still let him answer the charges.

Technically lost nothing and there are no charges to answer... it is often overlooked that Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was produced and entered into public record... long ago.

He had the right to answer, and he didn't and was "convicted"

Convicted... of what? Not succumbing to the nauseating stench of interwebbed bullshit?

IT'S AN ACTUAL, LEGAL CASE THAT OBAMA LOST!

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Philip J. Berg is a nutcase... nothing has been lost... it's unresolved and ongoing.

It's unbelievable that John McCain hasn't taken full advantage of Obama's birth deFACTS. Oh yeah, maybe McCain's staff doesn't get hooked by the published "facts" of every troll they encounter on the internet.

oVo wrote:There is only the myth of this event happening that exists in the real world.

Follow the link.

oVo wrote:This "evidence" may have been held up in court somewhere...
Held Up - delayed, as in not yet presented OR held up - as if somebody actually sat in the back of a courtroom somewhere and physically waved the evidence overhead OR held up - whereas the supposed evidence was actually stolen from it's prior possessor. BUT... there was NEVER a hearing where a judge reviewed "the evidence" in a court of law and actually passed down a ruling making a declaration about the status of Barack Obama's US citizenship.

Follow the link.

oVo wrote:Technically lost nothing and there are no charges to answer... it is often overlooked that Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was produced and entered into public record... long ago.

No, that has been brought up like fifty times. It is often overlooked by you that it has been brought up by you. Bt the fact remains that Obama's own family claim that he was born in Kenya. Alleging then that it is a forgery of some kind.

oVo wrote:Convicted... of what? Not succumbing to the nauseating stench of interwebbed bullshit?

It's not interweb bullshit. This isn't some rumor or something. the former States Attorny of Pennsylvania has brought up actual charges abainst Obama.

oVo wrote:HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Philip J. Berg is a nutcase... nothing has been lost... it's unresolved and ongoing.

I like how you put "Unresovled and ongoing" in small porint after calling Phillip Berg a nutcase... Could you provide us with a reason as to why he's a nutcase? Perhaps there is some skeleton in his closet?

oVo wrote:It's unbelievable that John McCain hasn't taken full advantage of Obama's birth deFACTS. Oh yeah, maybe McCain's staff doesn't get hooked by the published "facts" of every troll they encounter on the internet.

Phillip Berg is not a troll on the internet. Are you using a strawman argument? The fact is, you can't see the evidence. So how do you call it bullshit? You're not basing your argument off anything. I'm not even on his side, but someone has to point out that you can't call it bullshit just because.

Juan_Bottom wrote:

heavycola wrote:It's too simple a conclusion... there MUST be more to this.

Actually, I'm not sure but I think that I agree with Cola on this.

I'm not sure that you do.

Juan_Bottom wrote: I'M NOT SAYING HE'S GUILTY!

That's not the point.

I'm saying that from a LEGAL standpoint (in the same way an innocent person can get the chair) that I believe they are calling him guilty. You do know that just because you aren't in court that doesn't mean you can't be found guilty of anything right? Hell, you can be in court, refuse to testify or defend yourself, and be found guilty. Berg is even saying that even though Obama has technically lost, he'll still let him answer the charges.

What is the point is that Obama can never legally be called guilty just for not responding to Berg. Obama has not been called to trial. If he refused to go to trial, then ofcourse he can be found guilty even though he is not there. But there is no trial, therefore there is no case and Obama can not be found guilty.

Regardless of that, the court itself has not found Obama guilty.

Snorri1234 wrote:That's not the point.

This was completely lost on me. I just wanted to share this and next thing I know peope are acting like I called him guilty.
But this was why I wanted to share this:

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and tbe DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.

I just have a hard time believing that Obama would not respond to a real Request for admissions. It basically means that none of the huge fucking amount of people who are involved in his candidacy have the brains to do something so easy. It is not rocket-science to deny that the person who fucking pays you and has basically all the power a single politician can have right now is not a foreigner.

Seriously, think about this. How come the democratic candidate did not respond to something which would make their entire candidacy false? Did they just say "ah f*ck it" and ruined their changes of being elected which are basically a certain one?

Hate to say it Juan, but you're coming off as a racist.

Juan_Bottom wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:Yes McCain is certain to use it as he knows the report is 100% accurate and will guarantee the disqualification of his only real rival, just hasn't had time to mention it yet

U still owe me an apology for the 9-11 thread.

Also, you didn't follow the link did you?

Yoyu seem to think everybody who calls you out as a fruitloop ,with no life outside your computer, owes you an appology..........
I think you owe your parents an appology for completely wasting the life they gave you

Snorri1234 wrote:I just have a hard time believing that Obama would not respond to a real Request for admissions. It basically means that none of the huge fucking amount of people who are involved in his candidacy have the brains to do something so easy. It is not rocket-science to deny that the person who fucking pays you and has basically all the power a single politician can have right now is not a foreigner.

Seriously, think about this. How come the democratic candidate did not respond to something which would make their entire candidacy false? Did they just say "ah f*ck it" and ruined their changes of being elected which are basically a certain one?

I thought a lot about that too. I don't know if they didn't want to give power to their enemies... or draw attention to it.... or if this is legit... But I can't help but wonder. If it is real then there certianly is a lot of cover up going on. But if it's not real then why not answer it?

Obama could have had someone else answer for him at least. But Obama didn't even answer his brother when his brother said he was born in Kenya... why would you just ignore that? In fact, half of Obama's family claim he was born in Kenya, and Obama just ignores them... he is not a "family man" that's for sure...
But then that type of questioning leads me to wonder why hasn't anyone else brought this up? Not only McCain, but also the media...
Certainly people do not want to stake their career on something that sounds so silly,but this could make a career too. And McCain is getting his butt kicked in the polls, so why not use this somehow? Even if through ads "not approved" by him?

Frigidus wrote:Hate to say it Juan, but you're coming off as a racist.

Yes, I hate Kenyans. And the Irish.

Oh! But not Kenyan or Irish woman. Call me! ; )

Juan_Bottom wrote:And McCain is getting his butt kicked in the polls, so why not use this somehow? Even if through ads "not approved" by him?

Maybe...because they looked into it and found it to be a load of crap. If there was an inkling of truth to it all, "Angry Man & Redneck Girl" would be all over it like flies on a moose carcass.

Yet...they are not. That in itself is proof to me.

Backglass, you're the Jay of your side you know that?

How many times are you going to repeat that in light of what I say? Bullsh*t or not, Obama "admitted." Explain to me why if you were McCain you wouldn't use that? Are you also from some magical part of America where politicians only tell the truth?

Dramatic developments in Obama citizenship suits
This isn't going to help, but I found it to be entertaining.

But Andy Martin, an anti-Obama columnist, says the real reason for Obama's emergency trip is to stop his own pursuit of birth records, including an emergency writ to the Hawaii Supreme Court to request expedited handling after a previous filing to demand that the State's Department of Health release the records. "Obama did not pay any attention to his grandmother until I showed up in Honolulu," he wrote in an email. "Suddenly she is the center of his attention. She is so central to his campaign that he has suspended it! But when Obama was here last summer he only visited his grandmother for an hour. One hour! Now he suspends his campaign for her?"

Obama Ignores Credit Card Donation Fraud
Dunn dunn DUNN!!!
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_ ... ode=6DD6-1

What do Bart Simpson, Family Guy, Daffy Duck, King Kong, O.J. Simpson, and Raela Odinga have in common?

All are celebrities; and with the exception of Odinga and O.J. Simpson, they also are fictional characters. And yet, all of them gave money earlier this month to the campaign of Barack Obama, without any apparent effort by the campaign to screen them out as suspect donors.