Conquer Club

BigBallinStalin wrote:Jay and Phat: Don't post in this thread about different crap. Make your own, thank you.

Why don't you take a moment to READ the thread title?

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Jay and Phat: Don't post in this thread about different crap. Make your own, thank you.

Why don't you take a moment to READ the thread title?

It's my thread with my questions concerning a certain issue. If you disagree, it doesn't matter. Go start another thread.

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Jay and Phat: Don't post in this thread about different crap. Make your own, thank you.

Why don't you take a moment to READ the thread title?

It's my thread with my questions concerning a certain issue. If you disagree, it doesn't matter. Go start another thread.

Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. I have started countless threads that have veered off course to prove it. Furthermore our posts are keeping with the subject at hand. Sorry you can't be dictator of your own thread.

9/11 was a conspiracy just like the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, America's invovlement in the two world wars (esp. Pearl Harbour), the Iraq "war", and every other "major" event in their "history" (250 years). The American government is one of the most corrupt governments on this planet. Not that ours is any better...

JoshyBoy wrote:9/11 was a conspiracy just like the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, America's invovlement in the two world wars (esp. Pearl Harbour), the Iraq "war", and every other "major" event in their "history" (250 years). The American government is one of the most corrupt governments on this planet. Not that ours is any better...

If Pearl Harbour was a conspiracy, would you still consider it a good conspiracy considering the results? Same for WWI.

Titanic wrote: If Pearl Harbour was a conspiracy, would you still consider it a good conspiracy considering the results?

It was great for America. Sure they had a few battleships sunk in the harbour and approx. 3000 Americans got killed, but they (the country) went onto becoming a huge factory for making weapons for the allies. Safe from being bombed due to the 2 rather large oceans that border it. They made a ton of money from that war. All they needed was the right episode to make all Americans ok with them entering it.

England went from superpower to super in debt to the Americans during ww2. We only just finished paying off the WW2 debt 1 year before 9/11. then it was iraq, afganistan then the banks imploded.

England has been dealt 60 years of shit, whilst the defeated Germans and Japs went onto build greater manufacturing bases (no armies after ww2) than the home of the industrial revolution, England. Now since that, the pen pushers have decided it's cheaper to make stuff somewhere else and pay some Indian or Chinese worker f*ck all to make a tv, playstation, mobile phone etc.


So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Pedronicus wrote:

Titanic wrote: If Pearl Harbour was a conspiracy, would you still consider it a good conspiracy considering the results?

It was great for America. Sure they had a few battleships sunk in the harbour and approx. 3000 Americans got killed, but they (the country) went onto becoming a huge factory for making weapons for the allies. Safe from being bombed due to the 2 rather large oceans that border it. They made a ton of money from that war. All they needed was the right episode to make all Americans ok with them entering it.

England went from superpower to super in debt to the Americans during ww2. We only just finished paying off the WW2 debt 1 year before 9/11. then it was iraq, afganistan then the banks imploded.

England has been dealt 60 years of shit, whilst the defeated Germans and Japs went onto build greater manufacturing bases (no armies after ww2) than the home of the industrial revolution, England. Now since that, the pen pushers have decided it's cheaper to make stuff somewhere else and pay some Indian or Chinese worker f*ck all to make a tv, playstation, mobile phone etc.


So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Your from UK, cool, me too. 100% agree with what you said, WWII was the best thing to ever happen to the USA.

Titanic wrote:
WWII was the best thing to ever happen to the USA.

No, us leaving the UK would be.

jay_a2j wrote:

So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Because our economy is booming...?

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Because our economy is booming...?

Because 3,000 dead was apparently worth it to get over in the middle east.

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Because our economy is booming...?

Because 3,000 dead was apparently worth it to get over in the middle east.

Regarding how 9/11 may have been handled, all I have is speculation with no evidence whatsoever. I only entertain the thought from time to time, but it's not worth enough to spout anything as serious as you claim. So tell us, what evidence do you have?

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

So yeah, Japan attacking pearl harbour was a great bit of business for America. 3000 dead v the $ income = win win for the USA economy.

Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Because our economy is booming...?

Because 3,000 dead was apparently worth it to get over in the middle east.

Regarding how 9/11 may have been handled, all I have is speculation with no evidence whatsoever. I only entertain the thought from time to time, but it's not worth enough to spout anything as serious as you claim. So tell us, what evidence do you have?

4 missing black boxes
collapsing buildings at almost free fall speed (no resistance from lower undamaged floors)
evidence of explosives in WTC dust
FBI confiscated surveillance footage at Pentagon never released to public
building 7 being "pulled" on 911
the countless other unanswered questions


hold on a sec....


had to adjust my foil hat

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:
Sounds eerily like 911, hmmm.

Because our economy is booming...?

Because 3,000 dead was apparently worth it to get over in the middle east.

Regarding how 9/11 may have been handled, all I have is speculation with no evidence whatsoever. I only entertain the thought from time to time, but it's not worth enough to spout anything as serious as you claim. So tell us, what evidence do you have?

4 missing black boxes
collapsing buildings at almost free fall speed (no resistance from lower undamaged floors)
evidence of explosives in WTC dust
FBI confiscated surveillance footage at Pentagon never released to public
building 7 being "pulled" on 911
the countless other unanswered questions


hold on a sec....


had to adjust my foil hat

Looks great on ya.

So there's nothing you really got, huh?

BigBallinStalin wrote:So there's nothing you really got, huh?

And THIS is always the kind of answers I get.


Nice

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:So there's nothing you really got, huh?

And THIS is always the kind of answers I get.


Nice

Wow, you really were being serious. I was kind of hoping you were joking. Half of what you've said has already been addressed in this thread.

1)4 missing black boxes
2) collapsing buildings at almost free fall speed (no resistance from lower undamaged floors)
3) evidence of explosives in WTC dust
4) FBI confiscated surveillance footage at Pentagon never released to public
5) building 7 being "pulled" on 911
6) the countless other unanswered questions

For 2, 3, and 5 please consult this (pimpdave's link):
Screw Loose Change: The Not Freakin' Again Edition

Please watch that first, and then we'll get into numbers 1, 4, and 6.

yeah, I have 3 hours.... not.

jay_a2j wrote:yeah, I have 3 hours.... not.

Do you need to be spoon fed? Do you know how to skim through something?

If you're not too busy pulling your ass hairs out with your teeth, you should take some time to look through the thread. Namely, the first page and my post on this video.

20:00: Finally, building demolitions. That's exactly what I wanted to know and couldn't explain myself.

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:yeah, I have 3 hours.... not.

Do you need to be spoon fed? Do you know how to skim through something?

If you're not too busy pulling your ass hairs out with your teeth, you should take some time to look through the thread. Namely, the first page and my post on this video.

20:00: Finally, building demolitions. That's exactly what I wanted to know and couldn't explain myself.

Good grief. I'm sure that there is more than one way to bring down a building. 20:00 answered no questions. The point is, it takes TIME to rig a building to "bring it down"...weeks even. Building 7 was brought down on 911. So the explosives were already in the building BEFORE 911.


But drop it. I have hashed and re-hashed, never to get a reasonable answer. And I don't expect one now. But keep believing in terrorists. I couldn't care less at this point.

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:yeah, I have 3 hours.... not.

Do you need to be spoon fed? Do you know how to skim through something?

If you're not too busy pulling your ass hairs out with your teeth, you should take some time to look through the thread. Namely, the first page and my post on this video.

20:00: Finally, building demolitions. That's exactly what I wanted to know and couldn't explain myself.

Good grief. I'm sure that there is more than one way to bring down a building. 20:00 answered no questions. The point is, it takes TIME to rig a building to "bring it down"...weeks even. Building 7 was brought down on 911. So the explosives were already in the building BEFORE 911.


But drop it. I have hashed and re-hashed, never to get a reasonable answer. And I don't expect one now. But keep believing in terrorists. I couldn't care less at this point.

I take it you didn't watch the part where they compared legal building demolitions to the Twin Towers' demolition, right? (It's shortly after 20:00, that skimming through method is very useful).

Well, it seems that after your hashing and re-hashing, you would be well-informed on such an issue. So, would you mind explaining how the alleged planned demolition (through the use of explosives before the passanger jets) looks in no way like other planned and legal building demolitions? (If you need a point of reference, then go skim through the video shortly after 20:00).

BigBallinStalin wrote: Well, it seems that after your hashing and re-hashing, you would be well-informed on such an issue. So, would you mind explaining how the alleged planned demolition (through the use of explosives before the passanger jets) looks in no way like other planned and legal building demolitions? (If you need a point of reference, then go skim through the video shortly after 20:00).

Thermite can be used in paint. It is a military grade explosive that burns at a temperature hot enough to melt steel.(jet fuel can not)The planes hitting the towers were "the reason" the towers came down. Eyewitnesses heard and felt an explosion coming from below them (basement) seconds before the plane hit above them.


I am done here. I'm not going to convince you and you won't convince me.

jay_a2j wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote: Well, it seems that after your hashing and re-hashing, you would be well-informed on such an issue. So, would you mind explaining how the alleged planned demolition (through the use of explosives before the passanger jets) looks in no way like other planned and legal building demolitions? (If you need a point of reference, then go skim through the video shortly after 20:00).

Thermite can be used in paint. It is a military grade explosive that burns at a temperature hot enough to melt steel.(jet fuel can not)The planes hitting the towers were "the reason" the towers came down. Eyewitnesses heard and felt an explosion coming from below them (basement) seconds before the plane hit above them.


I am done here. I'm not going to convince you and you won't convince me.

That's interesting because that video deals with exactly that excuse.

Before you run off, I'd like to point out the similarities in half of your reasons why compared to that movie's counter-arguments against each one. If you aren't close-minded, you should sit down this weekend or some other weekend and check out that film. You haven't seen it yet, so much of it will most likely be new arguments for you to fight against. It's a worthy test of one's mettle, so I highly recommend watching it some time.

BigBallinStalin wrote:If you aren't close-minded

The source of all our problems.

Skittles! wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:Skittles

The source of all our problems.

No kidding.

jay_a2j wrote:

Skittles! wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:The Jews

The source of all our problems.

No kidding.

They did 9/11.