Conquer Club

First blood to IA with Herpes taking 4 of 5 in LoW's singles games.

Master Fenrir wrote:First blood to IA with Herpes taking 4 of 5 in LoW's singles games.

That is an awesome use of the random map. Takes balls to step in to that one.

Lubawski wrote:That is an awesome use of the random map. Takes balls to step in to that one.

I thought so, too. First post updated.

LoW strikes. [game]6897961[/game]

gl both sides, should be a close one.

[game]6865533[/game]

low victory.

Following the games - pretty amazing show so far.

if I'm counting right its 6-3 so far, but looking at how all the games are going right now I'm forecasting 8-8 w/ 5 undecided.
Good luck guys!

we are terrible at dubs.

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

eh, so far. We will have to work a little harder the second half of the games.

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.

chephren wrote:

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.

More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.

waseemalim wrote:

chephren wrote:

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.

More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.

If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.

Lubawski wrote:

waseemalim wrote:

chephren wrote:

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.

More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.

If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.

Check your math. Number of dubs = number of trips + number of quads.

We played 56 dubs, 28 trips, 28 quads. Our Win % in dubs is 62.5% (35/56). Our win % in trips + quads is 73.2% (41/56).

reptile wrote:We will have to work a little harder the second half of the games.

Seeing how the Trips & Quads are going so far, you guys shouldn´t have much to worry.

Counting finished games: 5-5 now.

The Poison Rome Dubs should be finished soon, giving us our 6th win. But then things are starting to look bleak. I honestly don´t see us winning more than 8-9 games in this first round, and even that isn´t sure yet ...

Yes, the games are very close and very interesting. Great war already!

waseemalim wrote:

Lubawski wrote:

waseemalim wrote:

chephren wrote:

waseemalim wrote:we are terrible at dubs.

How so? You did well in CLA2 which was 50% Dubs.

More than 50% of our losses were on dubs. Just checked the number for home games -- we lost 9 dubs and 6 trips+quads. For away games, it was 12 losses from dubs and 9 from others.

If you lost 21 total in dubs, and 15 total in trips + quads, but there were twice as many dubs as trips+quads, you had a better win percentage in dubs than trips+quads.

Check your math. Number of dubs = number of trips + number of quads.

We played 56 dubs, 28 trips, 28 quads. Our Win % in dubs is 62.5% (35/56). Our win % in trips + quads is 73.2% (41/56).

Doh! Well, I'm an English teacher, so I'm not supposed to be able to do simple math.

LOL, as a historian, I understand exactly what you mean, Lubawski

You're both an insult to Academia.
Signed,
Some one who passed both your classes by never doing home work, never listening in class and then walking into an exam at the end of the year to score in the top 90%.

momma must be so proud!

just pointing out that the standard education systems today are a laugh. I am not saying I didn't learn, but when you're spending most of your time learning how to format your essay answer rather than learning the content (in history at least) That's a bad sign.

Dai_atan wrote:You're both an insult to Academia.
Signed,
Some one who passed both your classes by never doing home work, never listening in class and then walking into an exam at the end of the year to score in the top 90%.

If you had done your HW, you might have made top 10%. . ha ha ha. . .

(I am in Academia, too. . .loosely termed, though it may be)

Dai_atan wrote:You're both an insult to Academia.
Signed,
Some one who passed both your classes by never doing home work, never listening in class and then walking into an exam at the end of the year to score in the top 90%.

I tend not to give "exams". I prefer essays. And you wouldn't have only been listening in class. You would have been leading it. I don't lecture, I have the students lead discussions. If I need to guide them somewhere they missed, I do so, but that doesn't have to happen often.

Dai_atan wrote:just pointing out that the standard education systems today are a laugh. I am not saying I didn't learn, but when you're spending most of your time learning how to format your essay answer rather than learning the content (in history at least) That's a bad sign.

How slow was your class that it takes that long to learn how to format an essay? What poor teachers you must have had. That explains how you ended up at the Legion at least.

Back on topic. Looks like a great battle so far...and a quiet one. Where's the bad blood? Where's Scott when you need him?

Lubawski wrote:Back on topic. Looks like a great battle so far...and a quiet one.

Haha, it's hard to talk through clenched teeth. The majority of us are in a foul mood and doing our best to remain patient and hope for better luck in the 2nd set. You probably won't hear much from us until then.

Hats off to LoW so far. Great play from what I've seen in my games.