Conquer Club

Vote Count
strike wolf(1)-jrl332005
lawlrus_pwn(1)-colton24
Colton24(1)-mr.squirell

No lynch(2)-victor sullivan, lawlrus_pwn

with 9 alive need 5 to lynch

strike wolf wrote:FOS: strike wolf

God dammit man you meant post not vote! learn to write.

I can understand a little mistake here or there. Unvote strike wolf

colton24 wrote:For the record I know that. One vote is not a BW. Someone who tags along at about the 3rd or 4th vote to try to cause a quick lynch is a BW

And, now I understand you. UnFoS colton24

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not. I just don't see the point because a good townsperson or whatever they're called could get lynched Day 1. Not to mention the person lynched won't get a chance to do anything, as if they hadn't even played at all. Catch my drift?

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'm not. I just don't see the point because a good townsperson or whatever they're called could get lynched Day 1. Not to mention the person lynched won't get a chance to do anything, as if they hadn't even played at all. Catch my drift?

I know you're new so here's a little overview of a typical day 1. The first two pages are generally nothing but joke votes with people voting for others 'cuz of their avatar, the color of their socks, or because God told them to. Around page 3-4 someone will generally make a wild accusation and suddenly the word 'scum' starts getting thrown back and forth a lot. Basically, day 1 we don't lynch just anyone. We lynch the people based on who seems the scummiest in their manner and posting. We look for scumtells that point to them trying to hide something or having ulterior motives (e.g. bandwaggoning, lurking, blatant disregard for facts, misquoting someone else, etc). Once someone seems too scummy too ignore, we will start pressuring them with more votes. Once they are close to a lynch they will claim a role. We, as a group will then decide the validity of their claim and either lynch or forgive accordingly.

Basically, the lynch isn't just determined randomly and it won't be as if they "won't get a chance to do anything" because they have plenty of chances to defend themselves.

And should we lynch a townie, not all is lost. We can then look back in the posting record and see who did what and use that as grounds for deciding if someone was the cause of that townie's death (SCUM!). Generally I disapprove of no lynch's because we are then left with very little info the next day, but occasionally they work out for the better in small games like this.

unvote for now

jrl332005 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:FOS: strike wolf

God dammit man you meant post not vote! learn to write.

I can understand a little mistake here or there. Unvote strike wolf

colton24 wrote:For the record I know that. One vote is not a BW. Someone who tags along at about the 3rd or 4th vote to try to cause a quick lynch is a BW

And, now I understand you. UnFoS colton24

Quick question: What is "FoS"? I assume it's different from voting (as implied by the quote(s) above)?

FoS stands for Finger of Suspicion. It basically is saying you think someone is scummy but you don't want to vote them.

And for the record there is no need to unFoS someone

Mr. Squirrel wrote:Around page 3-4 someone will generally make a wild accusation and suddenly the word 'scum' starts getting thrown back and forth a lot

Example:

(Start of page 3)Me: Vote pmc for posting above me

Wercool or some other person: That's SCUMMY because you voted him for no reason you SCUM so vote colton24 you SCUM

Me: It was a joke vote! The day started 6 hours ago

7 votes and a truthful roleclaim later.

Colton24 Town Watcher has been lynched.

Other joke votes before me:

Vote fircoal for having yellow hair
Vote ace for being born in 1217
Vote Mr Squirrel for having a hat

colton24 wrote:FoS stands for Finger of Suspicion. It basically is saying you think someone is scummy but you don't want to vote them.

And for the record there is no need to unFoS someone

Like hell there isn't. FOS: colton unfos: colton because there were two seconds between the FOS and the unFOS and it caused me to reconsider.

Victor I understand the concern about accidentally voting for a town's person day 1 but really, if all we do is vote no lynch and let it go directly to night...what do we have to work on? We'd have to rely on A. that day 2 we would get something to go on since we didn't find any info to go on from Day 1...B. That a cop stumbles onto a mafia member while having little clue as to whom to vote for. You should never rush to a lynch but you also shouldn't just no lynch on Day 1 without letting discussion go around for at least a little while.

colton24 wrote: Vote Mr Squirrel for having a hat

And what an awesome hat it is.

Mr. Squirrel wrote:

colton24 wrote: Vote Mr Squirrel for having a hat

And what an awesome hat it is.

Damn right!

colton24 wrote:FoS stands for Finger of Suspicion. It basically is saying you think someone is scummy but you don't want to vote them.

And for the record there is no need to unFoS someone

Well I have played games on different websites and it has become a habit of me to UnFos if I have changed my view of a person, mainly because I have seen many towns lynch people purely because that person and a lot of Fos's on them. It was always important to tell the players playing when you stop suspecting someone.

UNVOTE
VOTE DUDAY

Lack of communication ~~~ SCUM!

confirm, sorry for being inactive.. I'll read through the thread tomorrow when I get home from Niagara Falls

duday53 wrote:confirm, sorry for being inactive.. I'll read through the thread tomorrow when I get home from Niagara Falls

How dare you have a life outside of mafia! Next thing you know we are gonna have people with wives and kids playing to!

I know it's terrible!

Vote Count
lawlrus_pwn(1)-colton24
duday53(1)-edocsil

No lynch(2)-victor sullivan, lawlrus_pwn

with 9 alive need 5 to lynch

Also if you didnt notice Duday53 replaced freewillhunting

Chop chop with the votes.

UNVOTE

VOTE NO LYNCH

I don't want to slug out a long d1, and this has so few players a bad lynch could kill the town. lest let the cops do their work and see if we can't get some real info tomorrow.

Yes, seems like a smart thing to do with these circumstances. Vote No Lynch

edocsil wrote:
UNVOTE

VOTE NO LYNCH

I don't want to slug out a long d1, and this has so few players a bad lynch could kill the town. lest let the cops do their work and see if we can't get some real info tomorrow.

Oh my, only 9 players. I'm not sure if I've ever been in a game so small (except real-time mafia games). Vote no-lynch

Unless I'm not mistaken that's a hammer for no lynch isn't it?

Ughhhhhhhhhh. Comeon people pay attention. Quickest D1 no-lynch ever. No information gathered unless you count the quick no-lynch hammer

Keeps the game from dying at least, it has happened far too often of late after a slow D1....

wow. I come back and you guys already decide the lynch (or lack thereof). I don't think I've ever seen a no lynch decided so quickly

Vote Count
lawlrus_pwn(1)-colton24

No lynch(5)-victor sullivan, lawlrus_pwn, edocsil, jrl332005, duday53

with 9 alive need 5 to lynch