[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
Conquer Club • IQ; WHATS YOURS? - Page 2
Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:04 pm
by stinkycheese
I got a 65, will someone be my friend?

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:25 pm
by Kugelblitz22
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...


Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:38 pm
by hawkeye
I got 101 after rapidly guessing through the last 7 questions.

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:51 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
after reaching 22, i just guessed, got like 110 i think...Find a better IQ Test, that one just gave me a headache with all the patterns and spins...

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:57 pm
by Serbia
105

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:16 pm
by razor34
stinkycheese wrote:I got a 65, will someone be my friend?

Can i be your friend StinkImagey.PLEEEAAAASSEE

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:17 pm
by Fircoal
I got 107, if I tried harder maybe I could of gotten better, or I not.

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:41 pm
by BBust
Actually just to clear this up for u guys 100 means average. My dads a scientist and i have to hear about this crap all the time. And Einsteins IQ in his day in age was actually 280 but in our day in age he'd just be above average by a good chunk. If your IQ is 130 it just means your slightly above average. Plus certain ppl score way higher in diffrent areas that was IQ tests are BS.

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:54 pm
by Minkish
126. meh

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:19 pm
by war_bloodline
122

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:02 am
by Neutrino
Kugelblitz22 wrote:
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...


Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...


These IQ tests might not be very accurate, but the personality tests are worse.

"Which shape do you feel is more inteligent?"
'I dont know, they are both freaking abstract shapes! How can abstract shapes be intelligent!'

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:24 am
by Serbia
Neutrino wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:
static_ice wrote:I don't know and I'm not taking the test now, but I heard from an unreliable source that you need 100 to speak english

probably false...


Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...


These IQ tests might not be very accurate, but the personality tests are worse.

"Which shape do you feel is more inteligent?"
'I dont know, they are both freaking abstract shapes! How can abstract shapes be intelligent!'


That show's you've got a great personality!

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:14 am
by boberz
my lowest 142 my highest 150 on various quizzes both internet and tv and books but i want to do a mensar one to know exactly as these arent accurate

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:23 am
by btownmeggy
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...


Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:32 am
by Backglass
btownmeggy wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...


Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.


Agreed. These are about as accurate as the "Love Tester" at the local Pizza Parlor. Hey! It says's I am "Hot Stuff"! :lol:

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:24 pm
by BOREDGIRL
I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
by boberz
btownmeggy wrote:
Kugelblitz22 wrote:Yeah that doesn't make any sense. 100 is average. People with below average intelligence can speak English.

Yeah those classifications are totally skewered. 50 is severely mentally retarded, not "about average" The high end doesn't make much sense either.
Real IQ tests take several hours and are administered by a professional and measure several kinds of intelligence not measured by these online versions.
These are fun to fool around with but don't read to much into them...


Oh, hello only person in this thread who is reasonable and seems to know anything at all about IQ tests.


no i agree with this as i said i want to be done by mensar to test as i dont believe the ones i got

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:33 pm
by btownmeggy
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.


How does one "fail" an IQ test??

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:35 pm
by hecter
Ya, you have a point. You can only score really really low and be considered mentally challenged. But not fail.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:36 pm
by Jesse, Bad Boy
btownmeggy wrote:
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.


How does one "fail" an IQ test??


XD

Sweetheart, it is times like this when you need to just sit back, let them talk their nonsense, and revel in your higher intellectual functioning. It's what I do in most threads of this nature, unless I see something that sorely needs to be corrected.

Saves on the headaches and marijuana bill.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:38 pm
by Aries
I had to leave within 5 minutes, so I didn't finish it lol, but I thought normal was 130, and 100 was just enough to get yourself dressed :lol:

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:41 pm
by hecter
Aries wrote:I had to leave within 5 minutes, so I didn't finish it lol, but I thought normal was 130, and 100 was just enough to get yourself dressed :lol:

No, you can dress yourself and your IQ is under 100 :lol:

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:02 pm
by BOREDGIRL
btownmeggy wrote:
BOREDGIRL wrote:I took it at the website you posted and I got 179. Then when I took it at http://www.tickle.com I got 182.

Anyways the IQ test is somewhat obsolete. It only tests certain kinds of intelligence. Einsten, Madame Currie and Galileo would have all failed the IQ test. I believe I read an article about Einsten actually failing an IQ test once. Intelligence can not be quantified.


How does one "fail" an IQ test??


On fails an IQ test by failing to be able to complete it. Frustration leads one to chose not to answer the questions rather than chose to answer them incorrectly. A score of zero = a fail in an IQ test.

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:49 pm
by Gilligan
103

IQ...

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:45 pm
by wick
103, no wonder i lose so many games playing against all you geniuses...