[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
Conquer Club • A moral question about foeing - Page 2
Page 2 of 2

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:48 am
by prior680
people who foe others are just ass wipes !!! 8-)

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:11 pm
by Sir_Frag
It's just a game.. everyone chill the f*ck out. I can't believe this thread even exists. Get some sunlight people

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:23 pm
by Timminz
prior680 wrote:people who foe others are just ass wipes !!! 8-)


Foe'd! How dare you insult me, like that?!

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:31 pm
by jefjef
Image

I foe EVERYONE! Bahahahahahahahahahahahaha Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha <cough>

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:31 pm
by BoganGod
jefjef wrote:
tiny wrote:So I've recently been foed by jj. He stuck in my face how I earned a spot in the pile. It troubles me and I don't know what to do. I can't sleep... Please hold me. :cry:


I love how the simple act of being foed causes some people internal torment and moral dilemma.

If I were in this situation I would foe the person - send a profanity laced flaming pm to him and tell all my friend about it. Maybe even get a cat.


Good thread! btw. This is internet. Not rl.


bs jj. you would cry like a little girl without her dummy(pacifer for the seppos(americans), not a derogatory term for intellectually challenged people), wailing at the injustice, searching frantically through your memory for what it was you did. Trying to make things right would consume your every waking moment. Please be honest with the community jefjef.

I think the term foe is BAD. Why not use the word ignore, much more truthful. Nations and tribes have foes.... Not some bespeckled nerd(nothing against those with less than 20/20 vision) sitting at a computer drooling and thinking "I shall foe this vile oxygen thief than he/she/it will be so very, very sorry". Sorry what your really doing is ignoring someone, making them go away so you don't have to read the dysentery draws dribble they write.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:39 pm
by premio53
I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:52 pm
by Mr_Adams
Send an envelope full of anthrax?

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:59 pm
by safariguy5
premio53 wrote:I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.

Wait, so if someone doesn't use cheap tactics but plays in a bunch of games with you you'd still foe them?

I've never foed anyone who I see in a lot of games, mainly because there's a lot of players who play tourneys and clan challenges require playing the same person multiple times.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:31 pm
by premio53
I have no idea what your question is. Simply put, for awhile it took forever to finish a game because of deadbeats and they seemed to keep joining and missing turns. That's when I established the Premio doctrine. If someone misses turns I don't wish to play them. It's still amusing how upset someone gets if a player wishes not to play them when there are 20,000 other opponents to choose from. Nuff said.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:29 am
by Leehar
safariguy5 wrote:
premio53 wrote:I am amazed at how some people get upset about someone not wanting to play against them. I have probably over 1,000 on my foe list with the overwhelming majority having to do with deadbeats who miss turns on purpose or for some kind of "strategy." There are 20,000 other opponents out there so what difference does it make if someone for whatever reason doesn't wish to engage in a game with you? When I foe someone there isn't anything personal. I simply wish to play someone else. I'm sure I have made someone's foe list but I'll never know because I almost never join games. Regards.

Wait, so if someone doesn't use cheap tactics but plays in a bunch of games with you you'd still foe them?

I've never foed anyone who I see in a lot of games, mainly because there's a lot of players who play tourneys and clan challenges require playing the same person multiple times.

Still, clan challenges and tourneys negate foe lists, so thats not really a problem.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
by AndyDufresne
In regards to the Poll, if a user just seemed to randomly add me to their Foes List, and I've had little contact/game-playing with them, I'd just write them off.

If someone who I had a history with (lots of game history or something like that), I'd be more inclined to send a PM, but I'm not entirely sure I still would.


--Andy

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:36 pm
by bobdakota
I was foed by a guy and asked why. He said he was medal hunting and would remove me. We had played a lot of games together. I am still foe and I think it is because I kicked his ass all the time :lol:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:45 pm
by safariguy5
premio53 wrote:I have no idea what your question is. Simply put, for awhile it took forever to finish a game because of deadbeats and they seemed to keep joining and missing turns. That's when I established the Premio doctrine. If someone misses turns I don't wish to play them. It's still amusing how upset someone gets if a player wishes not to play them when there are 20,000 other opponents to choose from. Nuff said.

The question is more directed at the underlined portion of the quote, it makes it sound like "you wanting to play someone else" implies the person is active and didn't miss turns. Foe deadbeats by all means, but in public games, if I see the same player in a bunch of my games, I don't foe them so I can play someone else. Sounds like you just foe deadbeats in your public games though, I was confused at the odd wording.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:28 am
by KoolBak
*sigh*

I foed you S. You were ruining a perfectly lovely thread just to be an ass, period. You don't actually play the game here, so it has nothing to do with your competitive ability....just that you're annoying as hell.

I did it reasonably, just so as to NOT have to read your fooking blather. YOU, however, went on to make many nasty remarks about ME and my preferences, my tastes, my habits and me as a person - just over foeing.

This thread, therefore, is incredibly hypocritical, n'est-ce pas? "Morality"? Really??

I wish the foeing action would axe the quoted foe-ee's posts as well....

And lastly, if by "replying" you mean a PM, then no you shouldn't as I believe the foe-ee's PMs are auto-blocked from the Foe-er's mailbox......

That's all - I'm outaa here...too painful.....must wash.........

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:43 pm
by Symmetry
KoolBak wrote:*sigh*

I foed you S. You were ruining a perfectly lovely thread just to be an ass, period. You don't actually play the game here, so it has nothing to do with your competitive ability....just that you're annoying as hell.

I did it reasonably, just so as to NOT have to read your fooking blather. YOU, however, went on to make many nasty remarks about ME and my preferences, my tastes, my habits and me as a person - just over foeing.

This thread, therefore, is incredibly hypocritical, n'est-ce pas? "Morality"? Really??

I wish the foeing action would axe the quoted foe-ee's posts as well....

And lastly, if by "replying" you mean a PM, then no you shouldn't as I believe the foe-ee's PMs are auto-blocked from the Foe-er's mailbox......

That's all - I'm outaa here...too painful.....must wash.........


I've reset the poll to add your option.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:53 pm
by KoolBak
lol....well played =D>

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:05 pm
by Mageplunka69
my thoughts are, once your a noob who does stupid moves to sacrifice a game, your foed ....""Foe em all""....♥ôô♥

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 11:00 am
by AndyDufresne
rbelgrod wrote:my thoughts are, once your a noob who does stupid moves to sacrifice a game, your foed ....""Foe em all""....♥ôô♥


"Foe 'em all and let god sort 'em out" ? :D


--Andy

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:54 am
by OliverFA
I will foe everybody who dares to win me. That way I'll become the new Conqueror soon :D

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:16 am
by -Maximus-
I have said this before, but I used to foe everyone under 1000. This made it so I could have the best potential to gain points. Nothing against all those that are on the list, just like to win points when I do win. I dipped below 1000 while playing assdoodles for the medal, maybe some people foed me as well.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:52 pm
by Pirlo
there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:03 pm
by -Maximus-
Pirlo wrote:there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:


Foed*

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:13 pm
by Pirlo
-Maximus- wrote:
Pirlo wrote:there's an ass who foed me when I disagreed with his narrow minded view in the forum :lol:


Foed*


what :---)

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:55 pm
by Serbia
I foed the user in question a long time ago. I can't stand idiots, and am always tempted to call such people out on their idiocy. Conquer Club, however, tends to think of that as "flaming" (see my ban for the use of the word "moron"), and bans me for it. Hence, the foe list has saved me from earning my month-long ban. I'll continue using the foe list, and add to it as necessary, in order to keep myself from being banned.

I'd like to note here, for the sake of the over-zealous mods, that I have NOT referred to anyone in particular as an "idiot" in this post. I am saying that if there were an "idiot" posting in these forums, that I would not be able to stand such a person, and would foe them. People on my foe list may or may not be idiots; I can not possibly comment, seeing as I no longer read posts made by people on my foe list. No flaming was committed in this post.

Re: A moral question about foeing

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 4:33 pm
by jefjef
This post was made by bubbles who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by chunks who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by puddles who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by spew who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by Oxygen thief who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.
This post was made by waste of skin who is currently on your ignore list. NEVER Display this post.


Image

Disclaimer: I have NOT referred to anyone in particular as an "idiot" in this post.