Conquer Club

the carpet man wrote:you are honest when you say you can not understand what i am saying? did you never learn to deduce? i believe it is fairly easy to understand the points of my previous post.

but feel free to ignore me and instead critique my grammar if you would rather. i understand it is easier than having an actual discussion

Your grammar produces a negative externality on all who dare to read your posts. Other people incur the cost of mentally making coherent your sentences. You don't incur these costs in the production of your posts; the readers do. In order to internalize the costs of your externalities, people decide to criticize your grammar (or they ignore your posts), so that you can stop imposing costs on them.

BigBallinStalin wrote:Your grammar produces a negative externality on all who dare to read your posts. Other people incur the cost of mentally making coherent your sentences. You don't incur these costs in the production of your posts; the readers do. In order to internalize the costs of your externalities, people decide to criticize your grammar (or they ignore your posts), so that you can stop imposing costs on them.

Thank you for this post.


Amazing.

I fucking love economics!

BigBallinStalin wrote:

the carpet man wrote:you are honest when you say you can not understand what i am saying? did you never learn to deduce? i believe it is fairly easy to understand the points of my previous post.

but feel free to ignore me and instead critique my grammar if you would rather. i understand it is easier than having an actual discussion

Your grammar produces a negative externality on all who dare to read your posts. Other people incur the cost of mentally making coherent your sentences. You don't incur these costs in the production of your posts; the readers do. In order to internalize the costs of your externalities, people decide to criticize your grammar (or they ignore your posts), so that you can stop imposing costs on them.

I think you are missing some other costs, such as, the cost of reading between the poorly written sentences to determine the underlying theme, the cost of "I'll never get that 2 minutes back in my life", not to mention the hidden taxations.

notyou2 wrote:

BigBallinStalin wrote:

the carpet man wrote:you are honest when you say you can not understand what i am saying? did you never learn to deduce? i believe it is fairly easy to understand the points of my previous post.

but feel free to ignore me and instead critique my grammar if you would rather. i understand it is easier than having an actual discussion

Your grammar produces a negative externality on all who dare to read your posts. Other people incur the cost of mentally making coherent your sentences. You don't incur these costs in the production of your posts; the readers do. In order to internalize the costs of your externalities, people decide to criticize your grammar (or they ignore your posts), so that you can stop imposing costs on them.

I think you are missing some other costs, such as, the cost of reading between the poorly written sentences to determine the underlying theme, the cost of "I'll never get that 2 minutes back in my life", not to mention the hidden taxations.

Sunk costs are sunk, sir.