Conquer Club

Watch AND learn, llamsagna:

Thorthoth wrote:

riskllama wrote:hey, at least i know where dunkirk is...

I was within 10 km... besides that's an unimportant piece of historical trivia.
However, you thought that Adam West played the mayor on American Dad (wrong) instead of on Family Guy (correct).
Now, that's really stupid.

That's the kind of thing that really makes your resume pop in the employer's eyes!

yeah, i'd probably just leave that bit off. depends on the job, really...

Dukasaur wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

riskllama wrote:hey, at least i know where dunkirk is...

I was within 10 km... besides that's an unimportant piece of historical trivia.
However, you thought that Adam West played the mayor on American Dad (wrong) instead of on Family Guy (correct).
Now, that's really stupid.

That's the kind of thing that really makes your resume pop in the employer's eyes!

Not everybody can use dramatic emphasis effectively... I can.

Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Somehow, I don't entirely trust your taste in movies that you haven't seen. I'm not sure what it is exactly though. You do seem a tad over-reactionary, but that can't be it entirely. I mean, this Nolan film you haven't watched seems to have irked you, and I can't quite put my finger on why I don't respect your take on it.

Perhaps it's me reading in to your posts too much, but I think there's just something there about the way you're judging a truly amazing piece of cinema (that you've not seen) that seems a bit off.

Maybe it's just me

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Somehow, I don't entirely trust your taste in movies that you haven't seen. I'm not sure what it is exactly though. You do seem a tad over-reactionary, but that can't be it entirely. I mean, this Nolan film you haven't watched seems to have irked you, and I can't quite put my finger on why I don't respect your take on it.

Perhaps it's me reading in to your posts too much, but I think there's just something there about the way you're judging a truly amazing piece of cinema (that you've not seen) that seems a bit off.

Maybe it's just me

Yea, probably just you.

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Somehow, I don't entirely trust your taste in movies that you haven't seen. I'm not sure what it is exactly though. You do seem a tad over-reactionary, but that can't be it entirely. I mean, this Nolan film you haven't watched seems to have irked you, and I can't quite put my finger on why I don't respect your take on it.

Perhaps it's me reading in to your posts too much, but I think there's just something there about the way you're judging a truly amazing piece of cinema (that you've not seen) that seems a bit off.

Maybe it's just me

Yea, probably just you.

Indeed, I kind of thought as much, would you be willing to explain why?

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Somehow, I don't entirely trust your taste in movies that you haven't seen. I'm not sure what it is exactly though. You do seem a tad over-reactionary, but that can't be it entirely. I mean, this Nolan film you haven't watched seems to have irked you, and I can't quite put my finger on why I don't respect your take on it.

Perhaps it's me reading in to your posts too much, but I think there's just something there about the way you're judging a truly amazing piece of cinema (that you've not seen) that seems a bit off.

Maybe it's just me

Yea, probably just you.

Indeed, I kind of thought as much, would you be willing to explain why?

Logically, if it's 'you' then you would be the best one to explain... but your neuroses and poor communcation skills seem to always throw a spanner in the works.

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

Thorthoth wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I told you nobody cared about your stupid movie.

Somehow, I don't entirely trust your taste in movies that you haven't seen. I'm not sure what it is exactly though. You do seem a tad over-reactionary, but that can't be it entirely. I mean, this Nolan film you haven't watched seems to have irked you, and I can't quite put my finger on why I don't respect your take on it.

Perhaps it's me reading in to your posts too much, but I think there's just something there about the way you're judging a truly amazing piece of cinema (that you've not seen) that seems a bit off.

Maybe it's just me

Yea, probably just you.

Indeed, I kind of thought as much, would you be willing to explain why?

Logically, if it's 'you' then you would be the best one to explain... but your neuroses and poor communcation skills seem to always throw a spanner in the works.

You misspelled communication.

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I don't know what right-left has to do with it.

I was listening to talk radio on Monday (even in Canada talk radio is very right-wing) and a majority of the callers loved the movie.

duk didn't get it? not buying it...

Dukasaur wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I don't know what right-left has to do with it.

Also there is no such thing as right vs left any more.

mrswdk wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I don't know what right-left has to do with it.

Also there is no such thing as right vs left any more.

Well, outside of the context of the French Revolution, left and right have always been a rather crude and clumsy way to categorize things. Still, a crude and clumsy way is better than nothing.

Except when it's misleading, which it sometimes is.

Dukasaur wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I don't know what right-left has to do with it.

Also there is no such thing as right vs left any more.

Well, outside of the context of the French Revolution, left and right have always been a rather crude and clumsy way to categorize things. Still, a crude and clumsy way is better than nothing.

Except when it's misleading, which it sometimes is.

Perhaps, though I think I used the term accurately.

Symmetry wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Well this is a disaster of a topic. I don't think I was prepared for the hostility from the right, looking for a way out. If only there was a movie that in some way reflected that.

I don't know what right-left has to do with it.

Also there is no such thing as right vs left any more.

Well, outside of the context of the French Revolution, left and right have always been a rather crude and clumsy way to categorize things. Still, a crude and clumsy way is better than nothing.

Except when it's misleading, which it sometimes is.

Perhaps, though I think I used the term accurately.

Maybe. I have no idea what you meant by it, so I'll have to reserve judgement on whether it was correct.

There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

Cade Weston wrote:There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

Welcome to Conquer Club, Cade! We hope you enjoy your foray into the forums!

Cade Weston wrote:There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

I need to quote this. LOL

notyou2 wrote:

Cade Weston wrote:There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

I need to quote this. LOL

Quoteception

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

notyou2 wrote:

Cade Weston wrote:There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

I need to quote this. LOL

Quoteception

Avoid both plagiarism and original thought. Use quotes.

Thorthoth wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

notyou2 wrote:

Cade Weston wrote:There are quite a few quotes inside a quote LOL.

I need to quote this. LOL

Quoteception

Avoid both plagiarism and original thought. Use quotes.

Avoid Hypocrisy. Use quotes.

Symmetry wrote:Have you seen it?

First movie I've seen in a long time that really blew me away. Zimmer's soundtrack is amazing.

Agreed.

Love Nolan and Hardy is a stud