Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:05 am
by freezie
Arbustos wrote:He didn't die from Expelliarmus... he died because his killing curse rebounded off of Harry and back at him. It's explained in that anti-climactic speech, you know. The Elder Wand can't hurt its current master, which Harry was. Expelliarmus merely caused the wand to fly out of Voldemort's hand and back to Mr. Potter.
And if you didn't notice, almost everyone dies by falling over, because unless you're already lying down, that's kinda how you go.
QFT
And that's how avada Kedavra kills...People just falls over.
I finished it, and found it fantastic. Many surprises in it..
Spoiler
And Harry Never died for those who actually understood it.Spoiler
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:08 am
by dustn64
What was the thing crying when harry "died"? I don't remember it saying.
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:10 am
by freezie
dustn64 wrote:What was the thing crying when harry "died"? I don't remember it saying.
Spoiler
A part of Voldemort's soul...duh..Spoiler
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:19 am
by dustn64
freezie wrote:dustn64 wrote:What was the thing crying when harry "died"? I don't remember it saying.
Spoiler
A part of Voldemort's soul...duh..Spoiler
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:28 am
by strike wolf
Arbustos wrote:But mass explosions are so cliche. And was it really worse than Senor and Senora Werewolf's deaths? *That* sucked.
Maybe but it still bit dramatic. Yeah I hated the fact that they killed two characters so close to Harry and we didn't get to see their deaths. ALso, in hind-sight I shouldn't have said that Harry's "chat" with Voldemort was unnecessary, I should have said it didn't need to be that long.
Still, they should have at least had some epic duel between Voldemort and Harry, not just that short little thing that they did.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:39 am
by dustn64
strike wolf wrote:Arbustos wrote:But mass explosions are so cliche. And was it really worse than Senor and Senora Werewolf's deaths? *That* sucked.
Maybe but it still bit dramatic. Yeah I hated the fact that they killed two characters so close to Harry and we didn't get to see their deaths. ALso, in hind-sight I shouldn't have said that Harry's "chat" with Voldemort was unnecessary, I should have said it didn't need to be that long.
Still, they should have at least had some epic duel between Voldemort and Harry, not just that short little thing that they did.
But If they made it long it would only prove that harry potter sucked ass at everything. because all of voldemorts spells wouldn't work and harry either would go blind or just keep missing.
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:41 am
by strike wolf
I'm getting tired of arguing this so I'm just going to end it with a very simple opinion:
ANYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN THE WAY SHE ENDED IT!!!
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:46 am
by Titanic
strike wolf wrote:I'm getting tired of arguing this so I'm just going to end it with a very simple opinion:
ANYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN THE WAY SHE ENDED IT!!!
But if they had a long duel, it would have made the thing with the Eldar Wand not true. If they duelled Voldemort would have got a direct shot fairly quickly, the Elder Wand would have had to protect Harry. All she could have added was a couple of spells which missed, which by the way would have hit hit someone behind Harry killing some more people off (as Voldermort was only going to do Avada Kedavra).
Freezie, thanks for that, I never worked that out...
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:51 am
by strike wolf
Titanic wrote:strike wolf wrote:I'm getting tired of arguing this so I'm just going to end it with a very simple opinion:
ANYTHING WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN THE WAY SHE ENDED IT!!!
But if they had a long duel, it would have made the thing with the Eldar Wand not true. If they duelled Voldemort would have got a direct shot fairly quickly, the Elder Wand would have had to protect Harry. All she could have added was a couple of spells which missed, which by the way would have hit hit someone behind Harry killing some more people off (as Voldermort was only going to do Avada Kedavra).
Freezie, thanks for that, I never worked that out...
Actually that's not true because like his mother, Harry willingly went to sacrifice himself to protect everyone else. So if Voldemort hit someone else with Avada Kedavra (other than a death eater) it would have rebounded against Voldemort.
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:10 am
by GolemGhoul
well. . . when I was reading the 6th book I found myself saying 'man I wish I was reading harry potter fanfiction.' I swear to god, when the authors shit starts sounding worse than FANFICTION, there is a problem. So I did what any sensible person should have done: read it on wikipedia
Read the Pendragon series by DJ MacHale. Its a lot more rewarding.
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:25 am
by Coleman
freezie wrote:dustn64 wrote:What was the thing crying when harry "died"? I don't remember it saying.
Spoiler
A part of Voldemort's soul...duh..Spoiler
Coleman quoting this to really hide the spoiler text wrote:This is dumb but Spoilerfor people that don't get it, the wand voldermort used can't kill Harry because it is Harry's wand. It instead killed the horcrux part of Harry, while Harry just had a near death experienceend spoiler.
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:03 pm
by Sh4wz0r
I thought it was the best book of the series. The last hundred pages were just awesome, except the 19 years later bit was a little cheesy.
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:10 pm
by 0ojakeo0
the pendragon erie i better dan dis
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:13 pm
by misterman10
0ojakeo0 wrote:the pendragon erie i better dan dis
fix your dam keyboard
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:15 pm
by GolemGhoul
misterman10 wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:the pendragon erie i better dan dis
fix your dam keyboard
I agree to both statements! >O