Page 2 of 9

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:49 pm
by browng-08
He's a communist...

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:56 pm
by ignotus
browng-08 wrote:He's a communist...


That's the best joke i heard this month!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :twisted:

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:40 pm
by Norse
I asked eliza what she thought about this subject:

>> Hello.
How do you do. Please state your problem.
>> Hi eliza. Just a few quick questions really. Does communism suck?
I'm not sure I understand you fully.
>> Well, some people are debating whether or not communism sucks, and I'd like to know what your thoughts on the matter are?
Did you think they might not be debating whether or not communism sucks ?
>> Well, I'm sure there were some satiriccal and ironic comments made, but on the whole, I think it is a sensible disscussion.
Is it because you are sure there was some satiriccal and ironic comments made that you came to me ?
>> Yes, I was wondering if you could help me draw a line under the matter.
You seem to be quite positive.
>> Well, you bring out my more pleasent side. Do you think communism sucks?
Your more pleasent side ?
>> yes, I am extremely happy to talk to you about issues of such importance.
You are sure.
>> Without a shadow of a doubt. What are your thoughts on communism?
Why do you ask ?
>> Because I am trying to figure out whether or not communism sucks.
Is that the real reason ?
>> yes. Does communism suck?
I see.
>> you see what?
We were discussing you -- not me.
>> no, we were discussing communism.
Are you saying no just to be negative?
>> no
You are being a bit negative.
>> listen, would the world be better off with a communist dictatorship?
Lets discuss further why your more pleasent side .
>> haha, you really are a naughty girl, but i've already wanked of 3 times today, and I'm feeling a little sore at the moment.
Oh, I really are a naughty girl ?
>> you seem to be very horny.
You're not really talking about me -- are you ?
>> well, actually I was trying to talk about communism, ut you keep trying to distract me
Were you really ?
>> yes. Do you think that our national production of goods should be based on equity?
I understand.
>> Maybe, but you aren't giving me a straight answer
You don't seem quite certain.
>> Please answer me, should capitalism be overthrown, and everyone have their land taken away from them, and used as state property?
Realy, everyone ?
>> yes, in principle, although both you and I know that the overlords will probably have the run of the manor , or so to speak.
You seem to be quite positive.
>> Well, I am actually trying to decide whether this is the way forward for this country
How long have you been actually trying to decide whether this is the way forward for this country ?
>> hmmm...about 10 minutes
Please go on.
>> well, as previously described, a few people on some internet forum are discussing communism, and I would like your expertise on the matter
Would you like it if they were not discussing communism ?
>> I don't mind either way, it is a fairly subjective topic.
Don't you really mind either way ?
>> well, it is either disscussing communism or trying to beat a fourth one out. It seemed to be the soft option
What does that suggest to you ?
>> That maybe I should stop wanking quite as roughly as I do.
Why the uncertain tone ?
>> Because I like the feeling of a tight grip around the old member.
Don't any other reasons come to mind ?
>> I can't think of any other reason. However, ive me a yes or no answer, does communism suck?
How do you think that you can't think of any other reason ?
>> enough about that. communism? does it suck? yes or no?
You are sure.
>> does communism suck?
Do you feel strongly about discussing such things ?
>> I don't, I just want to know what you think
Why don't you ?
>> because, like I said, I would like to draw a line under the matter
Does that reason seem to explain anything else ?
>> not really.
I'm not sure I understand you fully.
>> ok, maybe tyour not as helpful on these matters as I thought you might be
Can't you be more positive ?
>> no
Why not ?
>> Im going now
Please go on.
>> bye
Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:45 pm
by ignotus
Norse wrote:I asked eliza what she thought about this subject:

>> Hello.
How do you do. Please state your problem.
>> Hi eliza. Just a few quick questions really. Does communism suck?
I'm not sure I understand you fully.
>> Well, some people are debating whether or not communism sucks, and I'd like to know what your thoughts on the matter are?
Did you think they might not be debating whether or not communism sucks ?
>> Well, I'm sure there were some satiriccal and ironic comments made, but on the whole, I think it is a sensible disscussion.
Is it because you are sure there was some satiriccal and ironic comments made that you came to me ?
>> Yes, I was wondering if you could help me draw a line under the matter.
You seem to be quite positive.
>> Well, you bring out my more pleasent side. Do you think communism sucks?
Your more pleasent side ?
>> yes, I am extremely happy to talk to you about issues of such importance.
You are sure.
>> Without a shadow of a doubt. What are your thoughts on communism?
Why do you ask ?
>> Because I am trying to figure out whether or not communism sucks.
Is that the real reason ?
>> yes. Does communism suck?
I see.
>> you see what?
We were discussing you -- not me.
>> no, we were discussing communism.
Are you saying no just to be negative?
>> no
You are being a bit negative.
>> listen, would the world be better off with a communist dictatorship?
Lets discuss further why your more pleasent side .
>> haha, you really are a naughty girl, but i've already wanked of 3 times today, and I'm feeling a little sore at the moment.
Oh, I really are a naughty girl ?
>> you seem to be very horny.
You're not really talking about me -- are you ?
>> well, actually I was trying to talk about communism, ut you keep trying to distract me
Were you really ?
>> yes. Do you think that our national production of goods should be based on equity?
I understand.
>> Maybe, but you aren't giving me a straight answer
You don't seem quite certain.
>> Please answer me, should capitalism be overthrown, and everyone have their land taken away from them, and used as state property?
Realy, everyone ?
>> yes, in principle, although both you and I know that the overlords will probably have the run of the manor , or so to speak.
You seem to be quite positive.
>> Well, I am actually trying to decide whether this is the way forward for this country
How long have you been actually trying to decide whether this is the way forward for this country ?
>> hmmm...about 10 minutes
Please go on.
>> well, as previously described, a few people on some internet forum are discussing communism, and I would like your expertise on the matter
Would you like it if they were not discussing communism ?
>> I don't mind either way, it is a fairly subjective topic.
Don't you really mind either way ?
>> well, it is either disscussing communism or trying to beat a fourth one out. It seemed to be the soft option
What does that suggest to you ?
>> That maybe I should stop wanking quite as roughly as I do.
Why the uncertain tone ?
>> Because I like the feeling of a tight grip around the old member.
Don't any other reasons come to mind ?
>> I can't think of any other reason. However, ive me a yes or no answer, does communism suck?
How do you think that you can't think of any other reason ?
>> enough about that. communism? does it suck? yes or no?
You are sure.
>> does communism suck?
Do you feel strongly about discussing such things ?
>> I don't, I just want to know what you think
Why don't you ?
>> because, like I said, I would like to draw a line under the matter
Does that reason seem to explain anything else ?
>> not really.
I'm not sure I understand you fully.
>> ok, maybe tyour not as helpful on these matters as I thought you might be
Can't you be more positive ?
>> no
Why not ?
>> Im going now
Please go on.
>> bye
Goodbye. Thank you for talking to me.

LOL!!!

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:32 pm
by Wisse
communism isn't that bad, it has its negatives and its positive.
but if everyone gets the same salary even if they don't do anything, what would you do? not much for sure. also Staling had power, and you can't have power in communism so that was not communism

second socialism is good i think.
just give me the negatives because i can't think of any...

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:35 pm
by muy_thaiguy
Wisse wrote:communism isn't that bad, it has its negatives and its positive.
but if everyone gets the same salary even if they don't do anything, what would you do? not much for sure. also Staling had power, and you can't have power in communism so that was not communism

second socialism is good i think.
just give me the negatives because i can't think of any...
Both take away from the individual.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:43 pm
by Wisse
muy_thaiguy wrote:Both take away from the individual.


euh?
socialism means, everybody has the same rights. communism means everybody is the same.

whats wrong with everyone having the same rights?

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:49 pm
by Dancing Mustard
Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:52 pm
by browng-08
There once was this crazy guy who had some wacky ideas, and a beard, and the people in power didn't like him much. And what did he say? "Steal from the rich and give to the poor."



Thats right. It was Jesus. I think...

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:56 pm
by Norse
No.

It was Robin of Loxley.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:59 pm
by Frigidus
Norse wrote:No.

It was Robin of Loxley.


Yes. Jesus.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:00 pm
by Snorri1234
Wisse wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Both take away from the individual.


euh?
socialism means, everybody has the same rights. communism means everybody is the same.

whats wrong with everyone having the same rights?


Nah, socialism is more of a watered down version of communism. Which basically is in all countries with better living conditions than the USA.

People who oppose socialists policies seem to think that poor people don't work as hard as rich people.

No kidding, they really think that.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:01 pm
by browng-08
Frigidus wrote:
Norse wrote:No.

It was Robin of Loxley.


Yes. Jesus.

Jesus Hood and the Merry Apostols

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:01 pm
by Norse
Frigidus wrote:
Norse wrote:No.

It was Robin of Loxley.


Yes. Jesus.


Are you sure about that?

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 3:05 pm
by ignotus
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.

You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out :roll: ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up :wink: ).

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:02 pm
by suggs
Hopefully there will be a communist state one day.
But its never happened yet.

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:24 pm
by Minister Masket
Norse wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Norse wrote:No.

It was Robin of Loxley.


Yes. Jesus.


Are you sure about that?

And there's no Alan Rickman in sight.
He's too busy being a new bad guy in Sweeney Todd!

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:37 am
by Dancing Mustard
ignotus wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.

You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out :roll: ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up :wink: ).

But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?

And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:34 am
by btownmeggy
Dancing Mustard wrote:And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.


:lol:

Re: Communism sucks

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:38 am
by Symmetry
Serbia wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:So I read about Communism in school yesterday, and I think it's the most retarded idea I've ever heard of. I go to work but then pay my dumb neighbour most of my money, because he's too stupid/lazy to work, wtf?!

I see a lot of people around here saying that communism/socialism isn't that bad. But how can you even be serious? It's just like being robbed every day.

Am I missing something, or is communism just the most retarded thing to ever grace the planet.


Hey, welcome to reality.


Hey- welcome to the 1950's

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:49 am
by Der Fuhrer
Only morons and retards believe in communism, an ideology that needs to go the way of the dodo bird. Any and all communists should be destroyed.

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:07 am
by browng-08
Der Fuhrer wrote: Only morons and retards believe in communism, an ideology that needs to go the way of the dodo bird. Any and all communists should be destroyed.

Ironic. You hate communism, and say it should be extinct, yet your name is that of an authoritarian leader. You should be extinct, you hypocrit.

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:16 am
by Der Fuhrer
browng-08 wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote: Only morons and retards believe in communism, an ideology that needs to go the way of the dodo bird. Any and all communists should be destroyed.

Ironic. You hate communism, and say it should be extinct, yet your name is that of an authoritarian leader. You should be extinct, you hypocrit.


You don't know the difference between communism and fascism now do you?

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:44 am
by Dancing Mustard
btownmeggy wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.


:lol:

Why are you laughing?

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:00 pm
by ignotus
Dancing Mustard wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.

You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out :roll: ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up :wink: ).

But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?

And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.


Yeah Meggy, :lol: !!!

DM, which of this statements you find more true?

1) Most of the people in this world are rich!
2) Most of the people in this world are poor!

BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites. :wink: