Page 2 of 4
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:37 am
by hiddendragon
i'll take netspyman as well...that should top of my team...
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:55 am
by Anarkistsdream
Why am I not yet listed on the first page.
BUMP
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:24 pm
by dragon dor
I M IN WITH SILLY _SIL // PASCALLEKE THE LAST TEAMMATE NACHITO NACHITO HE S LEADER
i would like to play
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:09 pm
by monster10
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:43 pm
by gdeangel
Team dragon dor / nachito... you have too many players with senior officer rank. Two majors and a captain can't play on the same team. If one of you want to play with silly_sil, I'll put you down for a team with two open slots. The other two would need to round up three NCO's (or lower)to fill out seperate teams in order to play.
Sorry if that's not clear from the tourney description... but mixing up team cooperation across ranks is the theme of this tourney.
change
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:17 am
by dragon dor
ok team is me (leader) pascalleke//silly_sil//vinzz
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:04 pm
by gdeangel
dragon dor - we could not find "vinzz" to verify rank. Also, pascalleke has a senior/commissioned officer rank and so the two of you can't be on the same team.
The rule is 4 players/team. Each team has one commissioned officer + 3 non-commissioned officers or lower. Non-commissioned officers would be anyone with SFC, Seargeant, or lower. We'll also accept a team where the most senior officer is a seargeant in order to build up more teams, but we reserve the right to change that policy for new entrants at any time based on interest levels...
Rank is confirmed as of the time of sign-up and is good at the time or the tournament even if someone loses rank, etc.
I can put you down with silly_sil and two "players to be named later" if you like.
Thanks
Bump
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:50 am
by jruss
Bump
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:03 am
by killmanic
I am willing to join (as the leader of course) and will take the UVReign
Me
Lipman
UVReign
Sun_Tzu
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:15 am
by madman7
im in --need a team
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:51 am
by hiddendragon
little brother is confirmed...i've known him for over 15 years, pm him and he'll join=) i know man
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:53 am
by daydream
ooh fun.
i will join with frozen_flame and kotaro, and whoever wants to be on my team.
we will play WWII eastern front

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:07 pm
by pascalleke
gdeangel wrote:dragon dor - we could not find "vinzz" to verify rank. Also, pascalleke has a senior/commissioned officer rank and so the two of you can't be on the same team.
The rule is 4 players/team. Each team has one commissioned officer + 3 non-commissioned officers or lower. Non-commissioned officers would be anyone with SFC, Seargeant, or lower. We'll also accept a team where the most senior officer is a seargeant in order to build up more teams, but we reserve the right to change that policy for new entrants at any time based on interest levels...
Rank is confirmed as of the time of sign-up and is good at the time or the tournament even if someone loses rank, etc.
I can put you down with silly_sil and two "players to be named later" if you like.
Thanks
well dont know about name vinzz but my rank is good know i guess

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:51 pm
by Kotaro
daydream wrote:ooh fun.
i will join with frozen_flame and kotaro, and whoever wants to be on my team.
we will play WWII eastern front

lets rock babes
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:54 pm
by gp24176281
2 questions:
1. Is Free-style aloud?
2. Can u have freemiums? (how many games in parralel?)
Great idea (lousy maps

)
gp
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:24 am
by gdeangel
1) My gut reaction is to allow any settings for the "home" battlefield that the commander/brigade selects. It would be consistent with the native soil advantage to have a "blitz" type map a la freestyle... of course there is no guaranty you'll get your home map (it will be decided by coin toss once Brigades are paired up).
2) Freemium can join. It will be one round at a time.
I've played a few of these maps but not all - they were selected by theme. If, by the time the tournament fills up, there are more war maps, I'll definitely add them on request (actually, I think Waterloo was still "new" when I started this... ) There's enough diversity of maps that I'd hope every team can find one that suits their dominant strengths...
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:21 am
by gp24176281
A pity,
I wanted in - but, free-style has alot to do with RL and I personally can't handle it.
If u reconsider and decide against free-style, please PM me and I'll raise a team.
thx,
gp
Re:
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:58 am
by frozen_flame
daydream wrote:ooh fun.
i will join with frozen_flame and kotaro, and whoever wants to be on my team.
we will play WWII eastern front

ya, ready ^^
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (25/64)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:23 am
by acores2005
Im in. Team 5 or 6.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Winner of
The Classic Bracket Tournament
Can U Rule The World Tourny
2nd place
Mini Classic Tournament Best of the Best
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (25/64)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:56 pm
by gdeangel
On the freestyle question, one of the skills of a good commander is getting the troops to coordinate their attack. That might mean planning an elaborate coordinated attack in stages, or just a simultaneous assault on the other side. In the first tournament round, for a freestyle map, there would be a major advantage clearly to having all four fighters show up a the same time, and get out fast... but both sides will face the same RW constraints of getting four people to show up at the same time.
I will add one limitation, however. For a freestyle "home map", it would not be fair for the team that is last to the battle to get an advantage (i.e., agree that fighter #8 will email only his teammates before joining the game.
So the rule will be that if a brigade chooses "freestlye" as their home setting, and that teams home setting is selected at random for the match up, no player on either side can take their first move for 24 hours from the time the game initializes. I will check this, and any team that violates this rule will automatically not just be bumped to a lower bracket, but will go before the war crimes tribunal

(i.e., you'll be eliminated because your troops will all be detained for investigation before the military court of gdeangel while the rest of the brigades fight on

).
Once you get past the first round of the match, I think its fair that a unit that can show up at the same time and launch a precisely time hit and fade operation gets a substantial advantage. This means freestyle games will probably end up being decided on the first round, but you never know... units have been known to put someone on guard duty!
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (26/64)
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:53 pm
by ralphcptc
I have two teams to enter. I am confirming the last player in each team
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (26/64)
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:05 am
by ralphcptc
Legion I
ralphcptc (leader)
ClockworK
Mekanik
seamusk
Legion II
ubcman64 (leader)
Daviedoo
conquerAce
theprotector85
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (26/64)
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:16 am
by conquerAce
ralphcptc wrote:Legion II
ubcman64 (leader)
Daviedoo
conquerAce
crbluth
I'm confirming my entry
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (26/64)
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:09 am
by ralphcptc
I have a third team
Legion III
crbluth (leader)
**noncoms are not yet confirmed**
Re: Brigade Commander Tournament - Quads (26/64)
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:18 am
by theprotector85
ralphcptc wrote:Legion I
ralphcptc (leader)
ClockworK
Mekanik
seamusk
Legion II
ubcman64 (leader)
Daviedoo
conquerAce
theprotector85
confirming my entry