Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:10 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:09 pm**

Ryan32 wrote:ill play any of u

1971059
1971060
1971061
1971065
I made 4 for you. Password is Ryan32. The only caveat is that if you lose all 4, you have to stop posting here.

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:45 pm**

But he's freemium and can't play them all right now.

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 6:19 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:27 pm**

No we play by my rules.
Classic
Flat Rate
Unlimited
no fog
seq

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:31 pm**

Ryan32 wrote:No we play by my rules.
Classic
Flat Rate
Unlimited
no fog
seq

HAHAHAHA! Why don't we just flip a coin? Play a map with skill involved, or don't bother playing at all.

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:42 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:51 pm**

i only played unlimited
plus i dont pla gay screwy maps
classic is the fairest map around
plus ill win cause u ho's suck dick

Posted: **Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:44 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:23 am**

Optimus Prime wrote:That my friend, is a lie. You've played both Age of Realms maps, along with Pearl Harbor, Feudal War, and American Civil War, all of which have gimmicks and fit the "gay screwy maps" definition.

So, are you going to man up or not?

Civil war is not a screwy map for one.
Realm of might is a very screwy one that i stopped playing.
Pearl Harbor is a screwy one that ive played like 3 times.
Im not playing you on a map ive never played
Play by my rules or shut up sit down and play with urself.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:02 am**

at least ask for settings that take more skill than flat rate unlim. Like BaldAdonis said, you might as well just flip a coin.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:42 am**

<edit>

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:53 am**

Since he's not taking up the challenge, can we PLEASE move this to flame wars. Then we can really tell him how we feel. :lol:

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:10 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:12 pm**

we play by my rules so i can kick ur geeky asses.

Chained and adjacent are all about the drop unlimited takes more skill then adjacent
Chained can only sometimes be useful

Must be afraid to play by my rules read my points and win % i got skill ya dumbass bitch

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:07 pm**

When does unlimited take more skill when all you have to do is connect your territories, fort one of them up to double digits, and then mow over your opponent???

In chained/adjacent, you have to actually be SMART about where you deploy/attack/advance. With unlimited, the chances of the first player winning the game increase dramatically.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:11 pm**

In unlimited you need to cut ur opponents supply line.
And the other player can do the same thing.

Positioning is even more important in chained and adjacent.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:15 pm**

But when their supply line is protected by neutrals (as is often the case in 1v1), it can't be cut off.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:17 pm**

I'm surprised at some of the comments in this thread by some of cc's most experienced and well respected players - knocking someones play style and game choice in such a public way should only happen in flame wars whether the comments are justified or not this is not the place for them. I have recently been criticised in a similar way and its not nice being on the receiving end, I wish people would consider that before they post.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:20 pm**

Rebelman, did you read the whole thread? This guy put up a challenge but refuses to accept someone else's terms. We're just debating the merits/luck of each setting.

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:33 pm**

<edit>

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:27 pm**

Dude i NEVER made this thread to accept people terms but to rather show whats going on in this 7 game series that i had with this guy and its now 50

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:29 pm**

this thread made me smile so thanks ... i enjoy laughing at silly things

Caro

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:33 pm**

BaldAdonis wrote:
Ryan32's feedback wrote:He is a marginal player with a huge attitude and a big mouth. Even when the game was handed to him, he couldn't pull it out of the bag. I took a gamble, a "RISK" if you will, and came up short in this game. Since my risk didn't benefit Ryan, he continued to use insults and profanity in chat to try to annoy me. If you read the chat from this game, you can decide for yourself who is the one who's upset. He has a track record of playing newbies 1 on 1 to score easy, but low point victories. I'd love to play this guy in a 1 on 1 game to show him just how "good" he is against a skilled player.
Ryan32's response: Play me i will win. The game was never never handed to me by anychance. Lol theres a diference between a moronic move and a risk. Hethink africa is easier to defend then australlia. This is primarilly negative feedback for me leaving him 1. So play me!!FOOL!

Sounds about right.
Also, Ryan32, you are terrible.

Ryan32 wrote:play me

i iwn game 1 now he won game 2

then he won game 3

lets see game 4

plus u cant believe shit when peoploe say something on the internet so how would i know ?

QFT

You did post a challenge to Baldy. (taken from page 1)

Posted: **Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:02 pm**

i did read the entire thread and who started the flaming in my eyes is irrelevant we have a forum for that purpose its called flame wars. Callouts is for setting up games and is also used by clans for various activities. Many of the posts on this thread fit into neither category.

Conquer Club

7 Game Series