Page 2 of 3
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:15 pm
by delboy01
BrutalMaggot wrote:delboy01 wrote:Just a thought. Maybe this was a bit of a slip by BM and he meant to login as ottoman67!!!

Like I said, pathetic. Mom no longer can afford cable TV I suppose
You really are a lovely person. I have alreay told you BUT HERE IT IS IN CAPS. i'm 50 YEARS OLD!!!!!
And my mum passed away very recently so please stop being an infant and just accept things like a man. If that is at all possible.
You act as if I were the person that started the original thread about you. I was not. I started this thread about ottoman67 and hammertime65. Your two partners in crime. That is a fact. You have been busted with both.
You can rant and swear and call people childish names, and say that the admins are not actually looking at your games and are just taking the word of 'some kid' as much as you want but that does not detract from the fact that you have been busted TWICE.
Finally, I do hope that you talk to people that you meet in everyday life as you do as a 'keyboard warrior'. However, if you do one word of advice, take out dental insurance.
Have a nice day.

Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:47 pm
by SlayerQC
Now, the cheater is calling himself a cockmunch, pwahahahaah!
Check it out below:
BrutalMaggot wrote:
Being a cockmunch I hate wasting time on yet another moronic troll like you kid but the only pathetic one here are idiots like you who just agree with the OP but know NOTHING as a fact. (like the witch hunters) You just open your flap prior to knowing any actual data. MORONIC
Btw, read what you wrote, you sir, IS the troll. Well, a funny one that is.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:49 pm
by SlayerQC
BrutalMaggot wrote:So STFU and go back to your nintendo huh loser?
Was this a question?

EDIT: Can we have hammertime65 in here?And ottoman67? (I wonder what name the number 66 has?)
That would increase the fun!
SERIOUSLY, bust them already!
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:20 am
by BrutalMaggot
truly_tasha wrote:BrutalMaggot wrote:White Moose wrote:lol, at first i didn't notice that BM wasn't the one accused, but then when i realised it i accually laughed for a while.
GJ busting yourself

Obviously I did a "search" under my name when someone told me about this thread idiot...why do even the simpliest of things have to be explained in detail to kids these days? Oh, right, their fucking morons.

actually it should be "they're fucking morons" as in "they are"
.... moron

To think that THAT was worth typing a reply over shows how is the actual moron...moron
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:04 am
by SlayerQC
BrutalMaggot wrote:truly_tasha wrote:BrutalMaggot wrote:White Moose wrote:lol, at first i didn't notice that BM wasn't the one accused, but then when i realised it i accually laughed for a while.
GJ busting yourself

Obviously I did a "search" under my name when someone told me about this thread idiot...why do even the simpliest of things have to be explained in detail to kids these days? Oh, right, their fucking morons.

actually it should be "they're fucking morons" as in "they are"
.... moron

To think that THAT was worth typing a reply over shows how is the actual moron...moron
no cheating fool reply to my comments?
Must mean they were worth typing?
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:17 am
by cisco2001
BM wrote:
"Being a cockmunch I hate wasting time on yet another moronic troll like you kid but the only pathetic one here are idiots like you who just agree with the OP but know NOTHING as a fact. (like the witch hunters) You just open your flap prior to knowing any actual data. MORONIC"
This guy is great. Not only does he inadvertently admit that he's a multi but he also calls himself a "cockmunch." LOL
I think that he's in the running for the number one spot for CC's version of the "Darwin Awards." Given to players that implicate themselves in a forum and as a result; end up with a score reset and a freemium account.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:21 pm
by delboy01
[game]2442515[/game]
Add this one to the mix. See the brutalmaggot thread.
Generalhoffman and stormrising 'aided' BM in 3 wins and here are the same two players in an ottoman67 win!!
And now I find that sgtfury another newbie is in this game and 3 with BM.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:17 pm
by SlayerQC
cisco2001 wrote:BM wrote:
"Being a cockmunch I hate wasting time on yet another moronic troll like you kid but the only pathetic one here are idiots like you who just agree with the OP but know NOTHING as a fact. (like the witch hunters) You just open your flap prior to knowing any actual data. MORONIC"
This guy is great. Not only does he inadvertently admit that he's a multi but he also calls himself a "cockmunch." LOL
I think that he's in the running for the number one spot for CC's version of the "Darwin Awards." Given to players that implicate themselves in a forum and as a result; end up with a score reset and a freemium account.
You are stealing my observation from above!!
lol kidding, isnt he dull or what? lolol
EDIT: i mean, BM is dull, sure isnt a japanese knife!
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 4:14 pm
by cisco2001
SlayerQC wrote:cisco2001 wrote:BM wrote:
"Being a cockmunch I hate wasting time on yet another moronic troll like you kid but the only pathetic one here are idiots like you who just agree with the OP but know NOTHING as a fact. (like the witch hunters) You just open your flap prior to knowing any actual data. MORONIC"
This guy is great. Not only does he inadvertently admit that he's a multi but he also calls himself a "cockmunch." LOL
I think that he's in the running for the number one spot for CC's version of the "Darwin Awards." Given to players that implicate themselves in a forum and as a result; end up with a score reset and a freemium account.
You are stealing my observation from above!!
lol kidding, isnt he dull or what? lolol
EDIT: i mean, BM is dull, sure isnt a japanese knife!
He's not the sharpest pencil in the box..lol
You are right, I missed your original comment about his self-insult. I relinquish all credit to you.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:46 am
by delboy01
Just in case this info has not linked I have re-posted this, with the new info, in both the ottoma67 and Brutalmaggot threads as the stats are ridiculously similar.
Ottoman67 and Hammertime65 (unless stated)
Game number(s):
[game]2124853[/game] otto win 8 man game last two left in
[game]2126850[/game] otto win 8 man game last two left in
[game]2138000[/game] otto win 6 man game last two left in
[game]2138391[/game] otto win 8 man game both left in last 3
[game]2151066[/game] Hammer win 6 man game last two left in
[game]2152916[/game] otto win 4 man game last two left in
[game]2154956[/game] otto win 4 man game last two left in
[game]2281170[/game] otto win 4 man game last two left in
[game]2283399[/game] otto win
[game]2337890[/game] otto win 5 man game last two left in
[game]2394981[/game] otto win 7 man game last two left in
[game]2395221[/game] Hammer win 5 man game last two left in
[game]2395237[/game] otto win 5 man game last two left in
[game]2448877[/game] Hammer win 5 man game last two left in
[game]2449072[/game] otto win 6 man game last two left in
[game]2442515[/game] otto win 8 man game last 4 left in with Generalhoffman, stormrising and sgtfury*
*See last three games in Brutalmaggot list
Brutalmaggot and Hammertime65 (unless stated)
Game numbers
[game]2139493[/game] 3 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2139772[/game] 8 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2140584[/game] 5 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2140617[/game] 5 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2149111[/game] 8 Player singles winner BM
[game]2151491[/game] 8 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2152937[/game] 4 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2153339[/game] 5 player singles winnerHM (about time you let him win one!)
[game]2205471[/game] 8 player singles winnerBM (Normal service resumed) - Last 3 with Hammertime65 and King conan as well!!!!
[game]2209076[/game] 6 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2210523[/game] 8 player singles A defeat (gasp)
[game]2281168[/game] 4 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2282932[/game] 6 player singles A second defeat!
[game]2282982[/game] 8 player singles A third
[game]2283392[/game] 8 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2283448[/game] 8 Player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2338121[/game] 8 player singles 4th defeat
[game]2345811[/game] 6 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2377736[/game] 4 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2412222[/game] 8 player singles winner BM Last 2 with Hammertime65
[game]2442516[/game] 8 player singles winner BM last 4 with general hoffman, hammertime65 and stormrising*
[game]2443476[/game] 8 Player singles winner BM last 4 with general hoffman, hammertime65 and stormrising*
[game]2445234[/game]8 player singles BM last 3 with general hoffman, hammertime65 (stormrising not in the game)*
*See last game for ottoman67 and last 3 for Brutalmaggot. The same new players are the last remaining in four 8 player games. This is beyond coincidence and yet more evidence against the cheating of these players.
Meanwhile
Brutalmggot is a major
Hammertime65 is a major
Ottoman67 is a captain
Both Brutalmaggot and ottoman67 have been previuosly busted for secret diplomacy with each other and blocked from playing together. Clearly they have totally ignored this and simply engaged in the same activity with another user.
They have also both used the same new players to win games which is extremely suspitious.
In my opinion these players are not just deserving of a score reset but a loss of premium as well. They have been sticking the finger up at the conquer club adminstration and the paying members as well. I don't believe that they will stop cheating unless they are given an effect punishment.
Thank you.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:53 pm
by cisco2001
I'm curious to see if BM will try to refute these numbers. Anyone that has played on this site, knows that the odds of this "naturally" occurring are impossible. This is ,quite simply, blatant cheating and I don't know how anyone can say that it is not.
An 8 player game is too unpredictable an environment to have the same players coming in 1 and 2 ,unless, there is cheating going on. I don't care how skilled a player or players may be.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:08 pm
by delboy01
And for ottoman67 and brutalmaggot to have the same 3 newbies in 8 player games who are also the last to be eliminated in 4 8 player games!!!! What are the odds on that I wonder?
I have to say I think others are involved with these two as well.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:21 am
by SlayerQC
BUMP IN CAP LETTERS!
update hunters?
thx for the good work btw!
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:28 am
by lancehoch
Still pending guys. Just an update, it has not fallen by the wayside.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:33 pm
by SlayerQC
thx lancehoh, cant wait to see the results
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:36 pm
by SlayerQC
hey brutalF, why so quiet now?
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:44 am
by DTT
Just for the record, I have recently finished a 5 man game with both ottoman and hammertime. We were the last 3 left and ottoman won the game. Not once did I feel like the game was progressing unfairly or that these 2 were playing together. We were all playing to win and it was a good game.
I've played several other games with just one of them and they have always been good. Never suspected any foul play out of hammertime or ottoman.
Could have sworn I had played BM in the past too, but search says no results. So no opinion on that.
For what it's worth. Which is close to nothing, I suppose.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 2:51 pm
by delboy01
DTT wrote:Just for the record, I have recently finished a 5 man game with both ottoman and hammertime. We were the last 3 left and ottoman won the game. Not once did I feel like the game was progressing unfairly or that these 2 were playing together. We were all playing to win and it was a good game.
I've played several other games with just one of them and they have always been good. Never suspected any foul play out of hammertime or ottoman.
Could have sworn I had played BM in the past too, but search says no results. So no opinion on that.
For what it's worth. Which is close to nothing, I suppose.
Sorry mate but that is totally meaningless. And anyhoo it's just another game they have won when playing together!!!! It just means thay are getting better at hiding it. Being the last two in almost every game they play is beyond reasonable. Especially as a lot are 8 player games.
Also, how can you explain away the shared multi's with brutalmaggot?
Also, it may have escaped your notice but hammertime65 and brutalmaggot have already been found guilty and blocked as have ottoman67 and brutalmaggot!!!! And for EXACTLY the same thing!!!!
You should have looked at the rest of the thread, the brutalmaggot thread and the evidence before trying to defend the indefensible.
Check it all out the games are clickable.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:33 pm
by DTT
delboy01 wrote:DTT wrote:Just for the record, I have recently finished a 5 man game with both ottoman and hammertime. We were the last 3 left and ottoman won the game. Not once did I feel like the game was progressing unfairly or that these 2 were playing together. We were all playing to win and it was a good game.
I've played several other games with just one of them and they have always been good. Never suspected any foul play out of hammertime or ottoman.
Could have sworn I had played BM in the past too, but search says no results. So no opinion on that.
For what it's worth. Which is close to nothing, I suppose.
Sorry mate but that is totally meaningless. And anyhoo it's just another game they have won when playing together!!!! It just means thay are getting better at hiding it. Being the last two in almost every game they play is beyond reasonable. Especially as a lot are 8 player games.
Also, how can you explain away the shared multi's with brutalmaggot?
Also, it may have escaped your notice but hammertime65 and brutalmaggot have already been found guilty and blocked as have ottoman67 and brutalmaggot!!!! And for EXACTLY the same thing!!!!
You should have looked at the rest of the thread, the brutalmaggot thread and the evidence before trying to defend the indefensible.
Check it all out the games are clickable.
He won fair as far as I'm concerned. He's a good player. They both are. To write it off as "it's just another game they have won when playing together!!!! It just means thay are getting better at hiding it." is pretty childish.
I did read the thread and I'm just adding my point of view, which is different than yours.
I don't care to explain anything about the shared multis. I said nothing about BM except I haven't played him. If I run across players I don't like or don't want to play again, I ignore them. End of story.
Don't expect me to look through those links. What a waste of time.
Good for you for investing yours though. They may have been blocked, but no one has explained much further. I'm not casting judgment on them nor am I defending them, just sharing a different view.
I've played them. They play fair. They are good.
Good luck with your vendetta.

Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:11 pm
by delboy01
So in short you are ignoring the evidence because you can't be ar$ed to read it. But based on one game that you play with them you say they are OK.
A very well balanced reposte.
So we have 100% agreement from everyone that has posted in both threads but you defend them based on nothing more than you had a good game with them.
Also, the last comment in your post was kind of what I was expecting to hear.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:13 pm
by Fireside Poet
Suspects:
* Hammertime65
* Ottoman67
Verdict: Busted/Blocked. Ottoman67 busted with BrutalMaggot. Hammertime65 busted with 7Deep7Green7, ColdSteel4u, & SirLOPALOT. All players are blocked.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [Busted +4] [Blocked]
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:15 pm
by Bones2484
Huzzah!!!
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:09 pm
by LycanWarrior
Fireside Poet wrote:Suspects:
* Hammertime65
* Ottoman67
Verdict: Busted/Blocked. Ottoman67 busted with BrutalMaggot. Hammertime65 busted with 7Deep7Green7, ColdSteel4u, & SirLOPALOT. All players are blocked.
Why are 7Deep7Green7 and ColdSteel4u both active? You stated that they are multis, being the same person. Yet both accounts are still up and running.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [pending]
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:12 pm
by LycanWarrior
Fireside Poet wrote:Suspects:
* Hammertime65
* Ottoman67
Verdict: Busted/Blocked. Ottoman67 busted with BrutalMaggot. Hammertime65 busted with 7Deep7Green7, ColdSteel4u, & SirLOPALOT. All players are blocked.
Why are 7Deep7Green7 and ColdSteel4u both active? You stated that they are multis, being the same person. Yet both accounts are still up and running.
Re: Hammertime65 & Ottoman67 [Busted +4] [Blocked]
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:15 pm
by Frop
Funny that FP busts them as multis and that KA couldn't get any further than a block (
previous thread).