Page 2 of 4
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:27 am
by JoshyBoy
karelpietertje wrote:hehe nice one. I dont know if they have Jizz Moppers in the army though
this topic got me thinking though. not in the way it's meant, feeling sorry for the cooks, but wondering if we should have a lower rank.
I think so. when I play a cook, its quite a big difference between a 799 point cook and a 100 point cook. mind, that's 600 points, but relatively it's 800% difference, which means a lot for point distribution after a game.
I say there should be a new rank below 500.
we should have a brainstorming contest how to name it.
first option: replace 'cook' with janitor, and have everybody beneath 500 be a cook.
of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor?
Janitor's lower. No question about that.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:35 pm
by squishyg
How about "Puisne", it means "lower in rank" and is pronounced "puny". It's used mainly in legal settings though. But one could argue a low-rank soldier outranks a lawyer any day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puisne
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:06 pm
by Woodruff
EagleofGreenErth wrote:One has to try hard to get to cook... my 1000+ point dump only got me to lieut!
Incorrect...one only has to play a very large number of multiple-player games on a very large number (read "all") of maps. Keep that up for long and it's bound to happen.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:08 pm
by Woodruff
karelpietertje wrote:of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor?
Without a doubt, a janitor is. After all...think "chef"...is there a comparable position for janitor?
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:12 pm
by Timminz
Woodruff wrote:karelpietertje wrote:of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor?
Without a doubt, a janitor is. After all...think "chef"...is there a comparable position for janitor?
Custodian, dick!
if that offends you, I recommend watching Half Baked
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:21 pm
by Blitzaholic
caymanmew wrote:i beleave it is not nice have a rank of cook. it is not anice feeling to think you are so low you are not eveing in a army rank. i think the lowest should be cadet.
what do you think?
i think your avatar is not nice either, little scary
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 10:27 pm
by samuelc812
Perhaps a rank of "Medic" mite be better not so insulting but still relevant enough to the Army, perhaps push cook back down to 600 and make 800 for Medic.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 1:08 am
by Woodruff
Timminz wrote:Woodruff wrote:karelpietertje wrote:of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor?
Without a doubt, a janitor is. After all...think "chef"...is there a comparable position for janitor?
Custodian, dick!
if that offends you, I recommend watching Half Baked
<laughing> But still, that's just a different NAME for the same job, not a more positive aspect of the job.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 1:09 am
by Woodruff
samuelc812 wrote:Perhaps a rank of "Medic" mite be better not so insulting but still relevant enough to the Army, perhaps push cook back down to 600 and make 800 for Medic.
Giving new life to the call "MEDIIIIIIC!". Now it'll be "MEDIIIIIIC, I'm a cook now! Morphine!"
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 2:54 pm
by KLOBBER
Cook is insulting, and so is Corporal.
You want to have a good rank, develop some skill and intelligence.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 3:10 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
Woodruff wrote:samuelc812 wrote:Perhaps a rank of "Medic" mite be better not so insulting but still relevant enough to the Army, perhaps push cook back down to 600 and make 800 for Medic.
Giving new life to the call "MEDIIIIIIC!". Now it'll be "MEDIIIIIIC, I'm a cook now! Morphine!"
Medic is a noble profession and should NEVER be considered below any rank.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 3:23 pm
by KLOBBER
It's certainly not below sergeant.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 3:55 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
.....and certainly not below any braggart
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:46 pm
by JoshyBoy
I would like to see the mods/admins thoughts on this
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:47 pm
by squishyg
How about Potato Peeler? Certainly the person who peels the potatoes is lower than the person who cooks them.
Traitor could also be the lowest low rank of lowliest time!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:04 pm
by JoshyBoy
squishyg wrote:How about Potato Peeler? Certainly the person who peels the potatoes is lower than the person who cooks them.
Traitor could also be the lowest low rank of lowliest time!
You could give the rank of traitor to people who get busted for being multis or cheating!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:20 pm
by Woodruff
KLOBBER wrote:Cook is insulting, and so is Corporal.
You want to have a good rank, develop some skill and intelligence.
Or FOE everyone that's better than you, like you do KLOBBER!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:22 pm
by Woodruff
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Woodruff wrote:samuelc812 wrote:Perhaps a rank of "Medic" mite be better not so insulting but still relevant enough to the Army, perhaps push cook back down to 600 and make 800 for Medic.
Giving new life to the call "MEDIIIIIIC!". Now it'll be "MEDIIIIIIC, I'm a cook now! Morphine!"
Medic is a noble profession and should NEVER be considered below any rank.
I don't disagree with that.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 1:28 pm
by GENERAL STONEHAM
JoshyBoy wrote:squishyg wrote:How about Potato Peeler? Certainly the person who peels the potatoes is lower than the person who cooks them.
Traitor could also be the lowest low rank of lowliest time!
You could give the rank of traitor to people who get busted for being multis or cheating!
Love it!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 1:52 pm
by Godsav1
I agree with some people there should be a lower rank then cook. Maybe you could do something like "drummer boy". At least that is part of an army.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 2:01 pm
by squishyg
Godsav1 wrote:I agree with some people there should be a lower rank then cook. Maybe you could do something like "drummer boy". At least that is part of an army.
I like that one!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
by Godsav1
squishyg wrote:Godsav1 wrote:I agree with some people there should be a lower rank then cook. Maybe you could do something like "drummer boy". At least that is part of an army.
I like that one!
Haha thanks thought it was a good one too.
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 4:12 pm
by squishyg
JoshyBoy wrote:squishyg wrote:How about Potato Peeler? Certainly the person who peels the potatoes is lower than the person who cooks them.
Traitor could also be the lowest low rank of lowliest time!
You could give the rank of traitor to people who get busted for being multis or cheating!
Nice!
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:02 pm
by a.sub
squishyg wrote:JoshyBoy wrote:squishyg wrote:How about Potato Peeler? Certainly the person who peels the potatoes is lower than the person who cooks them.
Traitor could also be the lowest low rank of lowliest time!
You could give the rank of traitor to people who get busted for being multis or cheating!
Nice!
only if their rank could be a noose and their group name is changed from "guests" to "Benedict's possy"
Re: rank of cook
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:58 pm
by Danyael
whats wrong with being a cook
oh wait